it’s also about the housing crisis and the racism that’s part and parcel with the housing crisis
a car-centric society is one that thinks that it makes sense to have stores, schools, and other services be several miles away in exchange for bigger, single-family homes. these respondents aren’t biking to and from those places.
likewise, a society obsessed with single-family homes as a wealth metric is one that rejects the idea of more multi-family housing, increasing sprawl and its accompanying climate effects
and a rejection of multi-family homes is at least in part tied to their association with the underclass, which is in turn exacerbated by stereotypes of minority apartment building dwellers dragging down property values and increasing crime rates
anyway, if you’re going to be in favor of bigger houses and further distances to retail and schools and what have you, at least have the decency to back heavy investment in public transportation
(but most of them won’t because, again, ideas about public transit granting “the wrong sort” access to your community)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
New from me: Kyrsten Sinema, we learned in an Axios article, has a secret weapon in her fight to winnow down Democrats' $3.5 spending plan — spreadsheets
New from me: one thing that ties together the Republican agenda lately is the sheer creativity on display as rules, laws, and norms are bent, twisted, and invented out of whole cloth in the pursuit of power
Meanwhile, Democrats are, well, conservative in how they think about The Rules. And it’s forcing them to fight with one hand tied behind their backs in the face of an onslaught of inventive chaos from the GOP.
wild that everyone who was in charge when we invaded afghanistan and completely fucked it up is now back twenty years later to say that they wouldn't have fucked up in afghanistan if only they were in charge
i could count on one hand the people with national security portfolios from years 2001 - 2004 in particular that i want to hear from on afghanistan to say anything that isn't some variation on "i'm sorry"
fully convinced the op-ed rumsfield would have been commissioned to write would have given me an aneurysm
But they won’t, because they want to have it both ways. They want to support the priorities and policies of the Democratic Party — but balk at the price tag, in order to show that they’re not beholden to the left-wing of the party.
You really have to wonder what kind of internal numbers OF has on what its revenue looks like without the cut it gets from sex workers’ subscriptions and transactions and how much investment they’d need from the new funders they’re trying to land to cover it
Just seems like a plan that fucks over sex workers in pursuit of (entirely hypothetical!) VC funding for a business model that now seems like its meant to be “what if Cameo but de-personalized”
New from me: within a month after Saigon fell, Congress approved over $450 million in 1975 dollars to get Vietnamese refugees out and resettled in America. We need that same energy now for Afghans
Since I filed this piece, two things have come to my attention. 1) that Biden authorized $500M from the United States Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance Fund to help Afghan refugees. 2) this chart :/