not so fun fact: The Economist was a consistent advocate for the Vietnam war, criticized Kissinger for waging the war too gently, backed the carpet bombing of Cambodia and argued the US should remain fighting it indefinitely.
The Economist also backed

Pinochet’s 1973 coup against Allende in Chile
Arming the Mujaheddin
Arming of the contras in Nicaragua
Invasion of Grenada
The Persian Gulf war
Afghanistan invasion
Iraq invasion

They, however, opposed:

The US civil war
“the Economist had backed an outright invasion of tiny Grenada in 1983, and the toppling of its revolutionary government... it airily defended this act, on the grounds that ‘adversaries of the west should live in a state of uncertainty'"

Zevin. “Liberalism at Large" (2019)
Yes The Economist was a major cheerleader for this too, including whitewashing the overt fascism of the coup plotters and lying about election fraud, even after the OAS walked backed their claims.
The Economist didn't just back the 1973 coup in Chile, it was an active participant in it. Indeed, as a token of appreciation to The Economist for helping propagandize the coup, "the generals bought 9,750 copies [of The Economist], distributed through Chilean embassies" - Zevin
Like the NYT, The Economist was, of course, also central to winning over centrists and liberals to the cause of invading Iraq. Also consistently lying and inflating threats.
anyway, Biden appears to have pissed off all of TERF island so that's cool i guess telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/…
absolutely supported that too, calling the MI6 bought and paid for street protests “explosion of public feeling’ and demanding the US support a blockade of Iran's recently nationalized oil exports.
But it's The Economist's editorials on the anti-colonial uprisings in British Kenya the year prior in 1952 that take the racist imperial cake
If you just want a pod on how shitty the Economist is we did a whole ass episode on it with the writer of Liberalism at Large

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam H. Johnson

Adam H. Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @adamjohnsonNYC

7 Sep
Only you can stop bathroom time abuse, a real thing normal humans should care about
abuse more generous bathroom time
abuse

more

generous

bathroom

time
Read 4 tweets
7 Sep
Dem leadership & WH put up zero fight to defend the greatest of transfer of wealth to the poor in 50yrs, proven to reduce poverty & hunger. This explains why they never talked about it. They end up 100% on the side of big business & it’ll cost them in 2022 nytimes.com/2021/09/06/bus…
Program existed, was working and was more popular than Jesus and democratic leadership basically never mentioned it and have acted embarrassed about it since day one
Biden and many dem governors are still living in May 2021 when everyone thought we were about to “go back to normal,” but reality didn’t bear this out so the plan is just to stick to the ra ra “we’re back” narrative despite all that’s happening with delta.
Read 8 tweets
6 Sep
yeah one thing we should've touched on in the piece is the contemporary stakes at work: erasing radicals from labor history and retconning liberal reformers as the primary drivers of progress serves to reinforce a similar framework on how people perceive how change happens today
This isn't to say radical elements––then or now––are beyond criticism but the left-punching, vote-shaming, respectability politics that makes up a great deal of contemporary liberal conventional wisdom is largely informed by a warped view of how progress was made, historically.
specifically the stripping of political labels in many pop histories is of interest to me. The removal of anarchism from our histories of turn-of-the-century radical unionism; the erasure of communism from histories of the BPP. We are uniquely scared of -isms which I find curious
Read 6 tweets
6 Sep
I mean the thing is Biden does have a history of evoking Beau’s death in a political context, some may be cynical—who knows. The problem is the NYT et al are trying to contrived Gold Star Family drama out of nothing to further punish him for the crime of withdrawing ground forces
The thinness of the story is the issue, it’s basically handful of people complaining whose politics we don’t know and who, in no way, represent a “Gold Star consensus” and it’s presented in such a smarmy way. They’re just out of ways of prolonging the “Afghanistan chaos” story
Read 4 tweets
2 Sep
It’s immigration and xenophobia. For some reason the role of so-called “center right” parties in Europe being worried about immigration flows from Afghanistan drawing voters to further right parties is almost entirely ignored in these “European leaders are mad at Biden” pieces.
Read what they actually say! They speak in soft EU liberalese but Merkel, Macron, Johnson are very upset the Taliban takeover may result in more Muslim immigrants. They often evoke Syrian “wave” of 2014-18 as to why it’s a problem and hide behind the polite language of “security”
Racism and fear of racist backlash is a, if not THE, motivating factor and no matter how many lanyards from the Atlantic Council or Marshall Fund drone on about betrayal or a lack of consultation or high minded liberal values its absolutely because EU leaders dont want immigrants
Read 4 tweets
28 Aug
Oh hey it’s that “analysis” vertical at the Times where NYT reporters are allowed to write thinly veiled opinion pieces that aren’t called opinion pieces for some reason
“Some” argued. Just not Peter Baker who was born without opinions or ideological objectives
Hey let’s check on @peterbakernyt’s totally neutral and independent “critics” arguing against Biden’s Afghanistan withdrawal
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(