The delay by the Foreign Office in publishing Raab’s meeting schedule is in contradiction to government guidance which requests ‘departmental core transparency data, to be published quarterly.’
And the line on the FCO's own website saying they will publish quarterly? 🧐
It also emerged in June 2021 that Dominic Raab's private mobile phone number had been freely available online for more than a decade. theguardian.com/politics/2021/…
Lord Ricketts, a former UK national security adviser, said: it ‘means that anyone who happens to have had his phone number...is able to lobby the foreign secretary, bypassing the official channels which everyone else has to use.' news.sky.com/story/foreign-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
💥The huge £4.8bn fund pretends to be the centrepiece of a levelling up agenda – but we think it’s just a way to funnel money into constituencies of political benefit to the Conservative Party... (1/6) thenational.scot/news/19534210.…
This week, the High Court granted permission for our legal challenge against this... This decision means the Government will have to defend itself in Court (2/6)
It’s the latest in a string of permission decisions that have gone in our favour.
Of the 14 cases we have issued since the start of 2020, the Court has granted permission in 11 at the first time of asking... (3/6)
The strange tale of Qured, the Government approved Covid testing firm that seems to have hit the headlines for all the wrong reasons.
THREAD
Qured whose company name is Health Technologies Ltd lists Stephen Catlin as a director.
Catlin, a member of the Tories ‘Leader’s Group’ has handed the party £450,000 including a £50k donation in Feb 21. He became a director at Qured in April 2020. bit.ly/2VEFwDJ
Qured hit the news last week after it was heavily criticised by customers for 'chaotic' service - sparking calls for them to be axed from the Government’s approved list. inews.co.uk/news/sajid-jav…
BREAKING: The High Court has ruled Michael Gove broke the law in handing a public contract to associates of his and Dominic Cummings at Public First.
The Court ruled a reasonable observer would think there was a real risk they won the contract because of favouritism.
The High Court found: "the existence of personal connections between (Michael Gove), Mr Cummings and the directors of Public First was a relevant circumstance that might be perceived to compromise their impartiality and independence..." glplive.org/judgment
The Judge continued: "failure to consider any other research agency...would lead a fair minded and informed observer to conclude that there was a real possibility, or a real danger, that the decision maker was biased" (paragraph 168). glplive.org/pf-judgment
🚨 The final day of our High Court hearing over huge PPE contracts to firms with no prior experience and the 'VIP lane' is underway. 🚨
It begins with Government trying to submit new evidence... at what some might say is a rather late stage in proceedings🧐
The Judge has refused the application on the basis that the evidence comes too late and effectively provides a "moving target" for us and @EveryDoctorUK. Which is simply not fair in a hearing of this kind.
Government lawyer tells the Court that the offers on the High Priority Lane tended on average to be better, bigger offers, so they had an advantage because of their nature.
Day 4 of our legal challenge over PPE contracts and preferential treatment to 'VIPs' is now underway. Today, Government's lawyers will set out their defence.
Michael Bowsher QC, barrister for the Government, tells the Court that Government has never said this was a perfect procurement. Acknowledge that "this was a procurement conducted in a particular context of stress".
Government claiming "all the High Priority Lane was was a different route into the decision-making process...It is not apparent that these contracts benefited..." 🧐
But emails from civil servants show otherwise - VIPs got quicker response times, 'handholding' and escalation:
First update - the Press Association have submitted an application in support of our request for the total amount of public money Government wasted on PPE not fit for purpose to be unredacted and released from the confidentiality ring.
JCQC: Perfectly understandable to prioritise large companies offering large volumes of certain material, or any volume of urgently needed material, but it's not justifiable to select for negotiation somebody who’s a contact of a minister. That shouldn’t be a ground for selection