The #SecondAmendment Caucus' comment attacks the numerous problems in the Proposed Ruling, such as @ATFHQ's:
👮 blatant power grab
⚖️sidestepping of the legislative process
📝attempt to evade federal law & prepare a backdoor gun registry
The comment concludes:
"Contrary to @ATFHQ's claims that the [Proposed Rule] will “clarify” various aspects of federal gun laws, in reality the proposed rule would inject ambiguity after ambiguity into an otherwise unambiguous definition of “firearm,” which has... (1/3)
"...existed unmolested since its enactment over half a century ago.
"These changes will cause significant problems not only for the law-abiding public and the courts in trying to apply the agency’s intent instead of a statute, but also for the firearms industry… (2/3)
"By purporting to change the statute that Congress enacted, and by purporting to create entirely new federal crimes, [@ATFHQ's Proposed Rule] violates this principle & should be withdrawn in its entirety." (3/3)
Strong!!! 💪
The 27 Representatives' opposition to @ATFHQ includes sections discussing how ATF 2021R-05:
👎Is Omnibus Gun Control Legislation
👎Disregards Congress’s Definition of Frames/Receivers
👎Exceeds the Agency’s Authority
👎Violates Prohibition on a National Gun Registry
& more!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"[n]ew and pending permit applications for the permanent importation of firearms & ammunition manufactured or located in Russia will be subject to a policy of denial."
ICYMI: @Rep_Clyde & @RepTedBudd ROASTED @ATFHQ for the new "proposed rules," which are actually gun control by executive fiat
Reps. Clyde & Budd are the only Federal Firearms License holders (FFLs) in Congress! Check out their letter in defense of YOUR #SecondAmendment rights!⤵
"As federal firearm licensees turned Members of Congress, we see right through @ATFHQ's CHARADE to chip away at the #SecondAmendment & unilaterally expand its own influence and authority.
"We urge you to reverse course immediately. (1/7)
"It was Congress that defined the term 'firearm' in statute, not @ATFHQ
"But the ATF, through executive overreach, is positioning itself to blatantly usurp Congress's legislative authority by proposing broad & arbitrary definitions of industry terms[!] (2/7)
⚠️ It appears that ATF has intentionally designed its Factoring Criteria for Rifled Barrel Weapons w/ Accessories Commonly Referred to as “Stabilizing Braces” to effect a complete ban of every pistol-braced firearm currently on the market
"@ATFHQ repudiates its existing regulatory definition of “the frame or receiver," claim[s it] has never actually applied to anything[&]simply ignored it—deliberately misinterpreting & misapplying its own rule even while chiding federal courts for not participating in the charade"
"ATF attempts to explain what it means by claiming that an item becomes a firearm when it 'may readily be completed'–defining 'readily' by changing the statutory term 'readily be converted' to 'readily be assembled, completed, converted, or restored.'"