2/ That case of the 16th was not even shown correctly on the WHO map and very close to the terminus of bus line that goes past the WIV (Zhengdian site).
3/ The ‘market’ mentioned by the WHO in relation to that case was a foreign-owned modern supermarket like Walmart or Tesco.
Zero dead or alive exotic animal ever sold there.
4/ As Peter Embarek explained in the Danish TV2 interview, the WHO found that China did not even do any proper contact tracing of that supposed first case!
Going back to the accountant testimony, we can see that the CDC did some epidemiological tracing to the end of November. translate.google.com/translate?hl=&…
But when the WHO team interviewed that Mr Chen, he gave them the opposite impression, that no serious epidemiological tracing had been done. translate.google.com/translate?sl=a…
Another contradiction.
Maybe because as Mr Chen himself says:
"It is most likely that I was infected on the underground when I was diagnosed with this, or I could have been infected later when I went to the hospital." Mr Chen recalled."
Which basically would mean very early infections not far from the WIV, even before Mr Chen of the 16th (or 8th?)
So here we go. The supposed first case:
a. has contradictory onset dates
b. has contradictory epidemiological tracing
c. resided and worked not that far from the WIV / WIBP Zhengdian site.
d. points to plausible earlier local infections as he only moved locally.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
An interesting Politico article by Michael Callahan, former biosafety physician for the U.S. State Department’s Bio-Industry Initiative in the former Soviet Union and Bio-Engagement Program in Asia. politico.com/news/magazine/…
One key section:
Which basically links bak to Jasper Baker's recent book:
Made in China - Wuhan, Covid and the Quest for Biotech Supremacy hurstpublishers.com/book/made-in-c…
The small sample of 23 or so staff and students in her lab is largely irrelevant. There are many teams working at the WIV - in all 590 staff and students.
WHO, Berlin float sanctions if countries suppress information on pandemics
Spahn and Tedros made their comments at the inauguration of a new virus-monitoring center in Berlin, dubbed the WHO Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence. politico.eu/article/who-be…
An initial $100 million investment by the German government is funding the hub, which will be led by Chikwe Ihekweazu, currently director general of the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control.
For now, the hub will operate out of the Charité Berlin medical and research facility.
That sounds great.. But wait, who is the Head of Administrative Office for Global Health and Director Institute of Virology, at the Charite Berlin?
‘Undeclared Interests’ could have been the title of the book.
“The most important takeaway is that this book demonstrates the real danger is from arrogant and reckless globalized biological science which may have let loose the whirlwind… For their work to continue and their prestige to grow, they must capture public resources”
Sources said the Defense Intelligence Agency is the one agency that firmly believes in the lab leak theory. According to one source, the DIA’s confidence is based on work with a little-known institute under its control called the National Center for Medical Intelligence,
which was renamed in 2009 from the Armed Forces Medical Intelligence Center.
The center’s mission is to gather and analyze all sources of worldwide health threats, including foreign medical capabilities, infectious disease and health risks of national military importance.