Thread by @savndaniel

On Monday, before doing my matter in Court, I witnessed the trial of two rape cases. In the 1st case, records available before the Court shows that the Prosecution was lackadaisical and grossly incompetent. They missed out on too many crucial things, including medical report.

The accused was charged on a 2 count charge of which rape was among the charges. He is accused of raping a 21-year-old lady. Apparently, he did it. However, when taking his plea, he pleaded not guilty. The lawyer defending him was brilliant. He destroyed the evidence of the

Prosecution. By the time he was done with his cross examination, the alleged rapist was smiling. He was sure of walking out of prison a free man. The questions put forward by his lawyer during cross examination were such that, the Court found it difficult to convict him.

That was not so in the 2nd case. The accused person (a rapist), defile a child of 10 years of age, using his finger. The fact of the case has it that he invited the little girl into his room. The little girl innocently obliged with a godly mindset and conscience.

This rapist now instructed the little girl to remove her clothes that he wants to 'bath' her.

She did not question why the rapist wanted to bath her.

Seeing that the little girl was naked, the rapist tried repeatedly to force his penis into the little girl's vagina.

For obvious reasons, he could not penetrate. Not stopping there, he used his middle finger to penetrate the little girl, causing severe bruises.... She currently still receiving treatment.

Well, when he was brought to Court, to the surprise of his lawyer, he admitted twice.

He pleaded twice. From all the evidence available before the Court, the rapist was just returning from prison for the offence of rape. He said he is addicted to defiling little girls. The Court sentence him to 20 years in prison.