Alf Profile picture
21 Aug, 4 tweets, 1 min read
1/ The most relevant measure of real-economy & (perhaps) inflationary form of money is not M2

It’s the amount of bank deposits held by the non-financial private sector
By you

Bank lending and government deficits (not offset by private sector deleveraging) “create money”, not QE
2/ QE exchanges bonds (asset for the pvt sector) into reserves or bank deposits (assets for the pvt financial sector)

Just an asset swap

You as private person don’t have more bank deposits. At best, few pension funds and asset managers have more bank deposits

Not CPI relevant
3/ When you get a loan or the govt sends you money w/o asking for taxes back…

You have more bank deposits.
Potentially, you could spend them (inflationary form of money)

If it’s a loan, that’s very likely as nobody forces you to take a loan. You chose to

Watch lending data
4/4 If it’s a government check, you still have more bank deposits

Potentially inflationary if you spend it

But as you didn’t ask for it, you might want to just use it as a saving buffer or pay back debt

If you go for the latter, you destroy that money

Not inflationary

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alf

Alf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MacroAlf

16 Sep
Very unpopular take, but backed by facts.
And I care much more about facts than opinions.

House prices are NOT expensive, when measured as one should reasonably do: in real terms, assuming a 10% down-payment and the remaining 90% financed with a fixed-rate mortgage.

1/4 Image
The median US house price has gone up 2.4x times since 1990.
In real terms, we are looking at a whopping 70% price increase over the last 10 years.

But houses are not paid for 100% in cash.
The median home buyer finances 88% of the house price with a fixed-rate mortgage.

2/4 Image
What's really relevant is how much these mortgage installments weigh on your net monthly income.
The red line in the chart measures just that, with the index = 100 in 1990 for comparison.

So how can (mortgage payments / real wages) be pretty low if house prices are high?

3/4
Read 4 tweets
12 Sep
“Where is the demand for fixed income coming from?”

This question is often asked, and the answer is very simple and accessible to everybody as public info.

Regulation.

Wait, what?

Let me explain with a simple example.

1/8
After 2008, regulators decided banks must hold a large amount of liquid assets to service strong liabilities outflows during a crisis.

These assets are called HQLA (high quality liquid assets) and each bank must own HQLA enough to meet stressed outflows => LCR above 100%. Source: Google
Now, this generally means that banks own around 15% (!) of their balance sheet in HQLA.

Before the LCR regulation, this used to be much smaller as banks were not forced to own that many liquid assets. Source: Google
Read 8 tweets
14 Aug
The gold standard (black box) prevented govt to inject large qty of resources in the private sector (big deficits w/o plans to tax back) and banks to create tons of money (strong lending)

Constraining credit creation conflicts with the very human nature - ''I want all, and now'' Image
After '71 (orange box), credit expansion is a completely elastic process - we can freely expand/contract the amount of money in the system.
Obviously, we choose to expand credit very often.

But sometimes deficit hawks prevail and we ''put deficits under control'' (black arrows)
Keep in mind the pace of change matters - decelerating credit creation is enough to slow down YoY GDP and earnings growth.
When you go into net surplus, you are actively draining resources from the private sector.

See what happens
2000: crisis
2007: crisis
Read 4 tweets
13 Aug
What's QE all about?

When the Fed buys bonds, the asset side of banks balance sheet is changed from
x bonds to
x reserves

Both are assets & have good regulatory/liquidity treatment

But bonds earn you coupons and expose you to market risks and volatility
Reserves don't

1/4
If the Fed buys bonds from non-bank financial institutions (e.g. asset managers), their asset side will be changed from x bonds to x bank deposits

Similar story: bonds earn you carry and expose you to interest rate/convexity/credit spreads risks and vol
Bank deposits don't

2/4
Fin.Inst. need to earn coupons to survive
They also have to be exposed to market risks on the asset side to match/hedge the risks on the liabilities' side of their balance sheet

A pension fund holds long duration liabilities and needs long duration assets to hedge risks

3/4
Read 5 tweets
13 Jul
''Who's buying bonds at nominal yields below foreseeable inflation rates?''
I get this question a lot.

The short answer is: regulatory driven price-takers (pension funds, insurance companies, bank treasuries etc).

The more detailed answer in the thread below.
1/n
Let's start from Bank Treasuries.
After the GFC, regulators introduced the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR). It forces bank to own a stock of High Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) to counter sudden strong outflows of deposits.
Cash and bonds are both HQLA.
Bonds often yield > cash.
2/n
You can't compare a 10y bond with overnight cash.
For a Bank Tsy, O/N cash = CBk depo rate. The term structure for the CB depo rate is the Overnight Index Swap (OIS) curve.
10y bonds should be compared to 10y OIS swaps.
Treasuries pay you OIS+30 bps on avg.
You buy them.
3/n
Read 6 tweets
9 Jul
Inside money and outside money.
That's your easy way to think about what operations are (at least short-term) inflationary and which ones are asset price inflationary only.
Inside money never reaches the real economy.
Outside money does.
1/10
If the govt spends money it does not plan to collect taxes for, new outside money has been created.
A bank making a new loan literally credits your account out of nowhere (no deposits or reserves strictly needed, just capital and willingness to borrow/lend).
Outside money.
2/10
Can you see how this might be short-term inflationary? Expansion of credit or net govt spending boosts aggregate demand temporarily. Ceteris paribus and with a small lag, this pushes prices up. 2020 is a prime example: massive credit creation + supply bottlenecks = inflation
3/10
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(