True. It was the theology and worldview that hurt me, I was never "hurt by the church" in any other way.
And Mark Driscoll is a very revealing piece of that: would you trust any theology that didn't instantly reveal Mark Driscoll to be a misogynistic piece of shit?

Or Paul (1 Corinthians Paul) for that matter.
Which reminds me, I was talking about the incident described here with a friend who's training as a therapist:
gothhouse.org/blog/territori…
Talking about it made me realize that, in spite of the trauma I experienced as a child that was all centered around fears of hell, that the hell-related trauma was mostly of the past. It was more like remembering OTHER irrational childhood fears --
You know, like closet monsters and that one house in the neighborhood that's clearly haunted and "but what if that monster in the story was real though?" kind of stuff.
The thing that gave me a full-on panic attack as a grown-ass adult was a li'l dose of patriarchy doctrine. A choir director going out of his way to emphasize how special and important he thinks it is that God created men and women *differently*
My therapist friend talked about trauma connected to feelings of safety/lack of safety. We talked about it storing feelings like, "this person (like a parent) who should have protected me, didn't."
And I thought, "why would patriarchy doctrine do that to me? My parents weren't big into that kind of thing, in fact, they were feminists... "

"Wait. I HAVE read this story. It's the Stepford Wives."
Imagine teenage me, then, being hit hard with patriarchy doctrine for basically the first time, at a church *my parents made me go to*
I didn't consciously have this kind of thought at the time, but I think somewhere in the depths of my brain a little alarm buzzer was going off: your parents WERE feminists, what if they've changed their minds about that?
What if they're not going to send you to college after all? Or what if they're going to make you go to a Bible college?
Because one thing that didn't occur to me at all was that my parents didn't have the faintest CLUE what I was being taught in Sunday School. I mean -- they MADE me go, right? Why would you INSIST your kid go to something where you don't even know what goes on there?
Evangelical parents had, maybe still have, a completely unreasonable trust in the church. That if your kid is in Sunday School or Church Camp or whatever, that they're getting more or less the same version of Christianity that YOU, the parent would teach them.
And that's on TOP of their unreasonable trust that youth leaders aren't abusers.

This is why I say Christianity should be for adults only.
Just imagine it. No hand-wringing over adult children "leaving the faith" because nobody would be so absurd as to think children were ever in the faith in the first place.
No more Christian schools, day cares, vacation Bible schools, conversion therapy, abusive "tough love" camps for wayward teenagers, after school clubs run by Project Blitz with the express purpose of indoctrinating children...
No more Sunday school, no more youth group, no more Bible Bowl, no more "teen dances" with a sneakily Christian rock band and an unexpected altar call
No more dangerous unvetted "Christian child-rearing" books. No more "purity" indoctrination for high schoolers even at supposedly secular high schools. No more ignorant 21-year-olds writing books like they're some expert on dating & scarring multiple generations to come.
Are you an evangelical parent who wants to share your faith with your kids? Fine! TAKE them to church WITH you, don't SEND them to church-related activities without you.
If they're too young to sit in church without squirming, they're too young to understand your faith anyway, get a babysitter or just read the Bible in your own house or something.
Obviously, this change wouldn't save kids from abusive Christian parents. But I think it might save kids with NON abusive parents who don't realize how abusive the Church itself is.
My daydream -- and it is a daydream because I don't realistically see it happening anytime soon -- is that as a society we change the WAY we think about the Christian faith, and view child indoctrination the way we now view child labor.
Below, images of children being exploited
And I just thought of something, the next time I run into some fetus cultists, my counter-protest is going to focus around the fact that the church abuses and exploits children.
As you can see from the heart rate screencap, this stuff makes me pretty HULK SMASH angry, I've had a rage hangover for about a day.
Does anybody else get rage hangovers? If something makes you mad it's like it takes over your whole body, absolutely floods you with adrenaline, and then you're an absolute wreck for a while afterward?
I guess that's the end of the thought chain, have a good Sunday everybody.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with McJulie is a centrist, not a leftist, I'm serious

McJulie is a centrist, not a leftist, I'm serious Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mcjulie

23 Aug
Oh, great, it’s another one of those “exvangelicals are so boring that I don’t really want to try to figure them out, so I’ll just trash-talk them from a place of complete ignorance” takes
There’s like a whole subculture of still-evangelicals who seem to think “Well, *I* examined my own religion & decided to stick with it, therefore this is obviously the only true, correct & sincere outcome.”
In one exceptionally wordy paragraph he credits "David Bentley Hart’s The Experience of God: Being, Consciousness, Bliss—a bravado defense of classical theism" for putting him "back on track" --
Read 73 tweets
22 Aug
I snorted coffee all over my keyboard, this thread is dangerous
(LOTR nerdery warning)
SINCE the book we know as "The Lord of the Rings" is written with the meta-narrative that it's the hobbit's own account of their activities related to the War of the Ring, translated into modern English --
It's ENTIRELY POSSIBLE that a different translator could go back to the original material, think "ugh, those fucking Victorians took out all the gayness and swearing, also, they interpreted every gender-ambiguous character as male" and PUT IT ALL BACK
Read 4 tweets
21 Aug
Went for a walk. See if you can spot the point where I ran into the fetus cultists protesting outside the Planned Parenthood. A screen capture of my hear...
@paulcarp13 and I donated to Planned Parenthood in honor of these guys Image
These people had that glassy-eyed "important parts of my brain are not functioning right now" affect that we expect from cult members.
Read 6 tweets
5 Jun
On a side note, the very first thing we were given to analyze in our AP lit class, start of senior year, was The Metamorphosis. I think it was supposed to make analyzing everything else seem easy in comparison? I dunno, it was one of my favorite things we read that year.
One of the challenges of scholastic literary analysis is that "because it's funny" is rarely considered an acceptable answer to the question "why did the author put that in there?"
Read 17 tweets
5 Jun
I tossed this off as a joke, mostly, but ever since then I've been thinking "what ARE the evangelical weak spots and how can we use them?"
The first evangelical weak spot that popped into my head was "extremely gullible." They're prone to snake oil, pyramid schemes, wacked-out conspiracy theories, plus grift and fraud of all kinds.

Can we use that against them?
And that presents a problem. Because, yes, if you just want to drain them of money, you can probably use the "extremely gullible" weakness to do it, but that probably doesn't lessen their political power in any meaningful way.
Read 38 tweets
5 Jun
I don't know what I should have done differently @paulcarp13 dropped me off at yoga on Capitol Hill at 4:45 and realized he didn't have his phone, we made an arrangement: "if I go home I'll text you, otherwise I'll be at Optimism Brewing when yoga gets out at 6:30" Then --
At 6:30 I went to Optimism and couldn't find him. I stayed there through one beer, then used the restroom & did one final sweep through the restaurant, assumed he must have gone home after all? Took the bus home.
By the time I got here it was 8:30 and of course he wasn't here, the car wasn't here, but his phone is still here.

So I thought, what am I supposed to do at this point? Go BACK to Capitol Hill? But that would take me at least an hour and he's the one with the car.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(