NFT and social token thesis for the $ZIL ecosystem: Celebrities and influencers carry as much value as any goods, product or services. In the blockchain world, it has started to give rise to the rebirth of NFTs which has naturally extended to social and fan tokens.
We are witnessing the early signs of a decentralised creator economy which enables influencers, artists and in fact anyone to monetise themselves. Their ‘virtual’ value becoming tradable on a “humanised stock market” that enables trading of ownership or belonging to a community.
Creators in this economy get adequately recognised and rewarded for their skills, authenticity, ability to engage a large fan base and general know-how by having a direct access to their fans. Fans on the other hand can extract value for their contribution to creators' success.
To execute on this thesis, the community and the core team have to come together. Execution will be in phases that could very well overlap. In fact, we can already see some of the implementation within the ecosystem, some started by the core team and more by the dev community.
Let me elaborate a bit on how I see these phases come together:
Phase 1 (aka Build the Basics Phase): In this phase, we focus on building the basic tools to make sure that the ecosystem and the community has the needed infrastructure, tools and other resources available.
I firmly believe that the success of the rest of the initiatives will heavily depend on the UI and UX of the tools and infra we build in this phase. There are a few key infrastructures that will be must:
Let's take NFT marketplaces for example. An ideal NFT marketplace must support:
1⃣ Easy access to NFT wallets
2⃣ Easy exploration of NFTs in all wallets
3⃣ Blind and public auctions
4⃣ Limited edition NFT drops
5⃣ Bonding curve NFT distribution
6⃣ Payment in Fiat and Crypto
7⃣ Royalty fees for secondary NFT sales
8⃣ Allow businesses to create a whitelabeled solution if needed with similar backend/smart contracts. This will be handy to build curated marketplaces that are less open.
On a similar note, an ideal NFT wallet must have the following characteristics:
1⃣ Mobile first
2⃣ Magic, Zeeves, ZILPay and Moonlet login integrations
3⃣ Ability to view and manage NFTs easily
4⃣ Connect the wallet with the NFT marketplace
Phase 2 (aka Growth Hacking Phase): In this phase, we ought to focus on building a community that supports the idea of NFTs and fan tokens. Without a supporting community that has a critical size, it is impossible to go any further. As any further building will not see traction.
The idea will be to build a community of collectors, fans, curators, artists and enthusiasts from all walks of lives. But, we won't be able to build a community without the right products and growth incentives to drive the demand for those products within that community.
To this end, the core team and the community should come together and take initiatives like:
1⃣ Build products to drive NFT volume on marketplaces.
2⃣ Set up a Creator’s Fund run as a DAO, the ownership of which can be tokenised and be tradable on ZILSwap.
3⃣ Create incentives for people to engage with NFTs and social tokens.
4⃣ Create a market for NFT creators which encourages creators to create more assets knowing that there will be a market for their assets.
Phase 3 (aka Advanced Building): This is the phase to go crazy. For example:
1⃣ New NFT application directions
2⃣ Decentralised Patreon for everything
3⃣ Decentralised social media
4⃣ Use DeFi to solve NFT liquidity
5⃣ Collectible games
Project completed in the last 4-5 quarters on the usability side.
1️⃣ Simulated testing environment.
2️⃣ Full-fledged web IDE to develop Scilla contracts.
3️⃣ Dev-friendly explorer that can be run locally.
Thread 👇
4️⃣ One-stop GUI to launch all the dev tools.
5️⃣ Testing library to make it easy to write unit tests.
6️⃣ Truffle-like framework for Scilla projects.
7️⃣ Learning portal for Scilla.
8️⃣ Revamped dev portal.
9️⃣ Ledger Nano X support and improved Nano S app.
🔟 ZILPay
Thread 👇
Projects that we took on core platform and dapp development side:
1️⃣ Scilla VM (WIP)
2️⃣ PolyNet Integration (WIP)
3️⃣ Staking contract and UI
4️⃣ Seed node decentralization
5️⃣ HGX
6️⃣ Research on Smart Contract Sharding
7️⃣ Improved consensus protocol for lower latency
Voting on the first $ZIL governance proposal has just ended. The proposal has passed with a resounding YES, which means that the community has now agreed on the rules for future decision making.
Time to analyze, introspect and see how to make this better next time. A thread 👇
1/ 348 different wallets voted. It may appear to be low given that 25,304 were holding $gZIL before the voting started. But, if you compare with other projects, it is in fact quite high. The last voting on YAM had 4 participants, 177 on YFI, 91 on SUSHI, 30 on UNI and 8 on SNX.
2/ Since 1 $gZIL = 1 vote, the total number of $gZIL used for voting was around 26,694, while the total number of $gZIL captured in the snapshot was 130,481. This translates to around 21% $gZIL being used for voting. The largest voter had 2,479 while the smallest had 0.002 $gZIL.
Some good discussions on the governance process: forum.zilliqa.com/t/zip-12-stand…. Thought it's worth sharing a summary of what people have been discussing:
1/ Several community members have argued that the voting period on the governance portal should be extended to 7 days 👉 Accepted.
2/ Someone asked to have a Telegram ZIP Alert bot to notify people when there is an ongoing vote. 👉 Maybe @Zillacracy could add this feature in their staking bot t.me/ZillacracyNoti…? The bot currently notifies delegators when the staking rewards are available for claim.
3/ Is there a minimum amount of time before people can decide to make changes to something that has already been approved, or is it a permanent thing? 👉 Maybe a cool-off period of a few months could be set in the future to make sure that the current flexibility is not abused?
Zilliqa governance proposal attempts to strike a balance between permissionlessness and spam mitigation.
1/ Allows one to start a conversation on a change that one firmly believes in by describing the idea as a ZIP and getting the initial buy-in from the community on the forum.
2/ However, it mitigates spams by requiring enough buy-in from the community in the form of informal "FOR" votes on the forum. At least 25% of votes must be "FOR", thereby signalling sufficient interest to take it to the next step. No $gZIL requirement also helps at this stage.
3/ At the next step of formal voting on the governance portal via Snapshot, it is required that the proposer must have at least 30 $gZIL to put the proposal to vote to prevent spam. But, in case the OP doesn't have enough $gZIL, anyone could do so on the OP's behalf.
A summary of the $ZIL governance process via $gZIL:
[Step 1] Proposing a topic: This has to be done on forum.zilliqa.com using the template provided.
Next steps in the thread 👇
[Step 2] Discussions and informal signalling: This happens on the forum as well. You can discuss a proposal with other community members and suggest changes and finally signal your opinion, i.e., whether you are in principle FOR or AGAINST the proposal.
The signalling is only informal and not final. No $gZIL is required at this point.
Step 2 Requirements:
1/ Each proposal must be given at least 3 days for others to signal their opinion.
We continue to hear that several $ZIL holders are unable to withdraw their tokens from certain exchanges and their withdrawal transactions seem to have errored out as incorrect nonce.
A thread on status update. 👇
1/ This has only affected a few exchanges, while there are others, where withdrawals are getting processed as expected. Also, given that the network is processing transactions as usual, we understand the frustration of some feeling stuck while others can interact on-chain.
2/ PROBLEM: We have spoken to some of these affected exchanges to better understand the issue at hand. It appears that those exchanges issued several consecutive withdrawal transactions which are expected to include an increasing counter called nonce.