I know a lot of you feel hopeless right now, but I watching this unfold, I want to contextualize a few things about the battle ahead.
#1 Exodus Cry and NCOSE are scrambling: 95% of coverage about OnlyFans supports SWers. They didn't expect this, and now want to shift blame. 1/
They didn't expect so much of the coverage to paint them as bad guys, or to talk about their religious campaign, or how it's hurting sex workers. They're nervous. 2/
This is markedly different than the Pornhub coverage in the fall, which repeated the Kristof misinformation about widespread illegal content. This time, with a few notable exceptions, the voices of Exodus Cry and NCOSE are excluded from the conversation. 3/
This is largely due to the efforts of SWers who, for the last 9 months, have made sure journalists knew who these groups really were. In Dec, most articles ran quotes with no context or qualifiers. Here, journalists are speaking almost exclusively with SWers. 4/
That's why, over the past day or so, Exodus Cry has tried to quickly turn the conversation to Twitter and Pornhub, where they feel on more solid ground.
NCOSE is bragging about a supposedly "groundbreaking" lawsuit (where 12 of their 13 claims were dismissed). 5/
That's why you also see @MasterCard trying to wash its hands of this as well. Very few people are talking about illegal content (as they did with PH), everyone is talking about banking censorship. 6/
So be proud. This is work YOU did. MasterCard and the antis are on their backheels, at least temporarily. It's our job to keep them there. It won't stop OnlyFans, but it will delay future attacks (and give us all time to regroup for the next fight).
Here's how:
1. Post about what this is costing you! The money you're losing. If you're skittish about $$$ figures, talk about your concerns: the house payments, rent, food, the percentage of your income lost. This is powerful, visceral stuff. 8/
2. Talk about independence that this brought you, and what it means to lose it. The narrative of these groups is that you're being exploited. Make them answer for what they've done. 9/
3. Showcase/screenshot/doc the actual verification process. I can't stress this enough. Obvs don't give away personal info, but one of their main claims is that nothing was ever verified.
Prove them liars on this, it discredits the rest of their argument. 10/
3. Make video content. It's much more appealing to media than text. 11/
4. Name names! (Tag them, assuming they haven't blocked you.) Follow them. (Don't harass, but be firm.) Respond to their claims, in their own feeds.
I can assure you that @mastercard is not loving this attention. 12/
5. Keep it going over the next few months. Talk about your difficulties. Talk about your lost subscribers and income. Do not let people forget that this is happening. Make it an ongoing story. /13
Most of all, understand that despite the panic, you are NOT powerless! Defeat not inevitable. Antis ultimately LOST each of their previous Wars on Sex (in the 70s, 80s & 90s). They had a victory, but I think it may sow the seeds of their eventual defeat. /14
One last point: only sex workers could have done this! Not studios, not OnlyFans, not me. Nobody cares about a billion dollar company. But they do care about every day people fighting to survive — and thrive — in a harsh world. Never forget how powerful you are.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hey adult creators! Good news, the loss of OnlyFans is not — I repeat NOT — a tragedy. You can thank NCOSE's Public Policy Analyst @PansySWatson for saving you from your $130/month exploitation.
Last I checked, a pimp profited by taking away the earning of sex workers. If there’s a pimp lobby, it’s NCOSE doubling their revenue last year by campaigning to cut off sex worker income.
Except, there is no clear difference when it comes to masturbation, dildos, all sorts of sexually explicit content that doesn't involve another person.
Antiporn ministry NCOSE just came out against CA #SB357, a groundbreaking bill that repeals a vicious and racially discriminatory 'anti-loitering' law — long been used to harass women and trans people of color, regardless of if they're selling sex. endsexualexploitation.org/articles/ca-mu…
It's essentially property protection law. It allows police to arrest you for looking a certain way or in a certain place. It's a way for them to arrest you even if you haven't actually seen you breaking the law. A "walking while trans" law. eqca.org/sb357-senate-p…
NCOSE's rational? It's good to arrest people of color and trans people for being outside because white men are trying to exploit them!
Just spent my Saturday morning going through the suit against Mindgeek (what fun!)
Went through all 33 Jane Does, and in almost every account, Pornhub removed the revenge or CSAM content as soon as they were made aware. They didn't wait for verification, they took it down.
When they didn't remove It immediately, it was because the person didn't have a link, or there was a model release. In one case, they even took down a video after the person lied and said she was a minor at the time of filming.
This is in such stark contrast to the rest of the complaint, which — without citing any evidence — says that Pornhub absolutely ignores reports and actively uploads illegal content on its own.
But when they actually have to show their cards, it's a bluff.
Fox News is advocating for a new Hays Code, in which the only acceptable way to discuss of sexuality is to condemn it. Mere acknowledgement is now molestation. Positivity is propaganda.
Perhaps they'd like it to be illegal, like Putin's Russia.
Today Mindgeek invoked Section 230 protections in an Alabama @ncose lawsuit seeking to hold it liable for videos uploaded by third-parties onto its site. law360.com/articles/14011…
Here’s one without a login. The original complaint does not suggest any delay on the part of Mindgeek once they were informed of the content. Just that they should have known. A similar case was filed against Reddit. al.com/news/birmingha…
The question is not "Should this content have been allowed on the internet?" It absolutely shouldn't. It's whether or not Pornhub or Reddit or Facebook (in the TX case) should be held responsible for something a user posts on the site. According to the lawsuit ...