To the movement in this moment: we must remember the history of the struggle. We don't have to be under the same banner to be in the same battle.

The week of the original March on Washington, there were hundreds of actions all over the country.
Diane Nash was in Selma organizing 2 years before MLK & John Lewis showed up. No women spoke at the March on Washington main event. Different banners, same battle.
In the abolition movement, Frederick Douglass and William Lloyd Garrison had different political strategies. Different banners, same battle.
White social gospel leaders in the early 20th century had some political differences with early civil rights groups. In fact, the NAACP in its beginning was led by white people, & there were some differences with W. E. B. Du Bois—not over race, but strategy.
When the welfare rights women pushed MLK to mobilize the original Poor People's Campaign to challenge poverty, race, and militarism, there were political differences within from other civil rights orgs and even religious bodies.
This history, and so much more, teaches that the movement for justice has never been unanimous-everybody following one person or one group. This week, as we head toward the anniversary of the March on Washington, there will be various gatherings and actions. We need them all!
There have been a lot of actions long before the 28th. The fight against voter suppression, for living wages, voting rights & full healthcare does not begin or end on the 28th. In fact if your only action is on the 28th, that doesn't even align w/the original March on Washington.
Some groups will focus on one-issue gatherings. If that’s the banner you want to be under, great. Some gatherings will focus on multiple issues. If that’s the banner you are under, great. But please understand: the 28th is just one day. A moment is not a movement.
Whatever banner you move under, don’t get caught up in ego and competition and foolishness. There is plenty of work to do. Keep your eyes on the prize.
Rev. Dr. @LizTheo & I have been invited to the @GoodTroubleDC Rally at the Lincoln Memorial & simultaneously (via Zoom) the immigration, voting rights, and wages rally in NC. We will take a break from the work we're doing in WV to go to DC & be in both places.
With the 47 #PoorPeoplesCampaign state coordinating committees, over 300 partners, and thousands of religious leaders, we have been engaging w/ our brothers & sisters among the 140 million poor & low-wealth people in this country before this week, and we will continue long after.
So our word to everyone is simple: find a banner, get under it, and join the battle for love, truth, and justice.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II

Rev. Dr. William J. Barber II Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RevDrBarber

14 Sep
There’s no national voter ID requirement in the new Senate bill, but there’s a dangerous gateway to legitimizing existing voter ID laws in states.
Why is Manchin using Trumpian language in the “Freedom to Vote Act” to suggest voter ID is OK in order to “restore confidence,” which feeds the lie? Voter ID needs to be taken out.
We fought NC’s voter ID requirement in court and proved it was discriminatory to people of color, women, and the poor, both in intent and in impact. And it was unnecessary, because we already had signature attestation.
Read 9 tweets
14 Sep
.@Sen_JoeManchin, There is no such thing as a "moderate" constitutional position. You didn’t swear to uphold the Constitution "moderately." And you aren’t moderate when it comes to taking corporate money. You are extreme and lavish.
And you aren’t "conservative," b/c you’re not trying to conserve voting rights, conserve the environment, etc. You’re quite liberal when it comes to tax cuts for corporations, when it comes to lying, when it comes to hurting the poor & low-wealth people in your state & nation.
Moderate/conservative Democrats simply means you say you are a Democrat in the primary and support the DNC platform to get elected, and once you are in office, you tell the corporations & greedy rich, "I’m for sale!"
Read 6 tweets
13 Sep
If the revised voting rights bill is truly strong, truly what John Lewis would've wanted, truly what’s needed and not something Manchin has watered down & compromised away to please the US Chamber of Commerce and Republican extremists, then the full movement might support it. ...
But if it's not, those of us in movements that are free to speak the truth, along with seasoned civil rights leaders, voting rights lawyers, and religious leaders will expose it. The attacks in this moment are too real for us to just keep going through the motions.
When the details of the bill are read, we will find out if it was compromised down to weakness. There can be no moderate position on voting rights and equal protection under the law!
Read 6 tweets
13 Sep
We know Manchin cares about corporations and the greedy rich more than the people. 84% of the COVID plan he voted for with no questions about its price tag went to corporations. But why is he so cautious now, considering the people so in need in his own state?
Is Manchin just the frontman for other corporate Dems who are convinced that only by being Republican-lite can they get elected? None of them who ran in 2020 said they would work against the DNC platform.
Black people, brown people, native people, women, poor and low-wealth people put them in office, and none of them in their primaries said, "If you elect me, I’ll block policies that would help you."
Read 7 tweets
11 Sep
Today, September 11, 2021, marks 3,000 days since June 25, 2013, the day when the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by removing preclearance in the landmark case Shelby County v Holder.
The late Ruth Bader Ginsburg famously wrote in her dissent of that decision, “[T]hrowing out preclearance when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.”
Congress has had 3,000 days now to fix this and restore voting rights protections to millions of Americans, but it has yet to do anything. They don’t even seem to have any sense of urgency about doing it. The infrastructure of our democracy is crumbling and in need of repair!
Read 4 tweets
10 Sep
.@WhipClyburn, We love you as a brother in the faith, but on this you are just wrong. The Build Back Better plan's $3.5 trillion can’t be a ceiling, not if you're really concerned about poor & low-wealth communities.

thehill.com/homenews/house…
We in the movement also disagree with those who block universal healthcare and want to leave qualified immunity in the George Floyd Bill. According to @EconomicPolicy you should be fighting for more! $3.5 trillion is already a compromise.

epi.org/blog/moral-pol…
I’m sure the 44% of South Carolinians who are poor or low-income—2.1 million residents, including 53% of children (578,000), 47% of women (1.2 million), 61% of POC (1 million), 36% of White people (1.1 million), & over 1 million who make less than $15/hr—disagree w/ you as well.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(