I’m completely comfortable making the case that, from Reconstruction to the modern era, Congress has been the hero and the Court the villain when it comes to freedom. Doesn’t matter how much the court points to Brown.
At the end of the civil war the court systematically butchered the reconstruction amendments and, not only has it never stopped that crime of intellectual butchery, but it has deliberately stopped Congress from exercising its enforcement powers under the 13th, 14th, and 15th.
I, for one, don’t know how Brown alone makes up for Prigg v Pa, Ableman v Booth, Dred Scott, Cruikshank, The Civil Rights Cases, US v Harris, Hodges v US, Giles v Harris, Plessy, Washington v Davis, Miliken v Bradley, McCleskey v Kemp, Bakke, Parents Involved, Shelby County, etc
And this is a wildly truncated list, not just in terms of number but in terms of subject matter as the list concerns primarily the rights of Black people. You expand the list to include Native Americans, Women etc and the re it’s gets uglier.
Reason why the court’s reputation is so high is both because it has tended to vindicate the rights of those with the biggest microphones and because my profession has served as its PR firm.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/15 You'll hear a lot of talk today about how what happened yesterday is extraordinary and antithetical to our history. It's important to reject that idea, not out of cynicism or pessimism but because that pretense of innocence is dangerous. Let's talk about U.S. Cruikshank.
2/15 Cruikshank is a case virtually every single con law casebook discusses though most con law professors don't necessarily spend a great deal of time talking about but it's instructive about how we frame yesterday's events.
3/15 In Cruikshank, decided in 1875, SCOTUS considered whether, under the Enforcement Act of 1870, the federal government had the power to prosecute members of a white mob that killed between 80 to 150 Black people. The case was essentially about a mass lynching.
1/x I want to explain as plainly as I can why Americans should be panicking about the fact that border patrol and ICE forces seem to be "policing" the streets of Portland. It's a personal story about why experience with thee officers.
2/x Before becoming an American citizen, I was a permanent resident. When I would travel overseas, I'd often come back through Miami airport because I'd visit my birth country. Inevitably, once I reached the customs officer, I'd get pulled out and taken to a back room.
3/x If you've never been pulled out of line at customs, here's what happens: they take your papers and they take you. They don't tell you why and if you're traveling with someone they don't tell them why.
1/x I suspect most people don’t care whether Princeton renames the Wilson school, especially if that gesture is meant to be it. But there is one saving grace about this and it is an opportunity to have a move adult view of our history, including Woodrow Wilson.
2/x So, here's a true story about 3 men: Robert Smalls, a former slave & one of the first Blacks to serve in Congress, Tomas Dixon, Jr., the author whose book & screenplay was used for DW Griffith’s Birth of A Nation, and Woodrow Wilson, the 28th President of the United States.
3/x Smalls was born into slavery around 1839 in Beaufort, South Carolina. His first owner was his father; his second, his half-brother. When Smalls was 12 or 13, his half brother began hiring him out as a laborer on the Charleston harbor.
1/x On this Juneteeth day, I want to step back a moment and talk briefly about, not the day itself, but how close we came to that day never coming to pass when it did. #HappyJuneteenth#JUNETEENTH2020
2/x From 1850 to 1861, there were about 150 proposals for a 13th Amendment that would have made it unconstitutional to abolish slavery. In other words, while the post-war 13th Amendment abolished slavery, the pre-war versions would have done the opposite.
3/x That 150 number is not a typo. Those in favor of slavery tried really, really, really hard to write it more explicitly into the Constitution. The fact that they didn’t succeed was not for a lack of trying and they almost succeeded.
1/x When Mayor Bowser took office she set up yet another commission to propose statehood for DC. I was one of the pointy headed academic nerds appointed to the commission to annoyingly begin every sentence with “well actually” every time a proposal came up.
2/x The idea for DC statehood was to go with the so called Tennessee model, in which DC would write a constitution, have its people vote on it, send it to Congress to adopt it and voila. As part of the project DC came up with a map. It looks like this:
3/x The plan behind the map was to draw lines around the part of dc containing the White House, and the capital and exclude them from the new dc state because, interestingly, much of that area contains tons of government buildings but virtually no residences or private buildings
1/x On July 16, 2009, Harvard professor Skip Gates was arrested as he tried to enter his home in Cambridge. It caused a a bit of a controversy: Black Harvard Professor arrested as he tried to enter his home.
2/x problem wasn’t just that police suspected Gates of trying to break into his own house but that the officer said he felt threatened. This is funny for anyone who’s seen Gates: wire rim glasses, barely 5 feet tall, maybe 130 lbs when wet, a limp from a childhood illness.
3/x Days after, on July 22, Obama, barely 6 months in office weighed in with the statement below. As these things go, the statement is pretty mild. The key, though, was that Obama said the officer acted “stupidly” in arresting Gates.