Interesting video by @DJSnM on the Chinese Mars rover mission. He mentions the landing scar and offers an interesting theory on the two lightened plumes and how that could happen on a single engine lander.
2/ While watching this video I was reminded of some recent, new thinking about the fluid flow physics you can see in this picture. See the many radial dust streaks? We have always said they are caused by enhanced erosion around rocks and in craters. However,...
3/ ...the latest thinking says there is something else going on in the physics to create these streaks. One problem with the “rocks and craters” theory is that the streaks are too regularly spaced. Why is the spacing between streaks usually about the same?
4/ It isn’t perfectly consistent spacing, of course, but if you ran an autocorrelation function on the streaks it would mathematically show a peak correlation at a typical amount of spacing between streaks. WHY? Rocks are not spaced uniformly on the ground.
5/ So the latest thinking is that this may be a flow instability. Sand is a “complex fluid”, and gas is a fluid, so when they interact (one going supersonic, the other accelerating from a standstill) it creates interesting patterns of flow instability.
6/ We see patterns of fluid flow instability throughout nature. Example: clouds. Why are they spaced so regularly in the sky? What part of physics does this? earthsky.org/earth/what-are…
7/ Another example. Sand dunes on Mars. Why are they so evenly spaced? mars.nasa.gov/resources/693/…
8/ Another example. Chains of pits in the ice sheets of Pluto. What makes the pits all be the same size with consistent spacing between the chains of pits?
9/ Answer: fluid flow instabilities, which cause flow to natural break up into convective rolls or other regularly spaced flow patterns. This causes condensation to happen in regular patterns, making clouds. Or it causes deposition of sand in regular patterns making dunes.
10/ The size of the visible feature is determined by the size of the invisible rolling pattern in the gas. Gas has a specific viscosity and density, etc., which causes it to roll in cylinders of a particular diameter. (en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horizonta…)
11/ It is possible the pits in Pluto’s ice are caused similarly by rolling flow of ice or liquid under the ice, connecting heat on regular patterns do the ice sublimates in long chains of regular spacing. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
12/ In each of these cases we see a phase-change phenomenon (condensation of water, sublimation of ice, deposition of sand — i.e., granular phase change) coupled with an invisible gas flow. The invisible gas flow is what creates the regular spacing in the visible features.
13/ So the latest thinking about the streaks we see in rocket landings is that it is another example of a gas flow instability coupled with a phase change phenomenon. This time, the phase change is “granular sublimation”, a fancier term for soil erosion. Example from Apollo:
14/ I was reminded of this while watching Scott’s very interesting video of the Chinese lander on Mars. NASA is doing experiments daily to understand the flow physics of rocket landings on the Moon & Mars.
15/ This gorgeous landing photo also reminds me of the human eye, and of the Eye of Sauron 😆 (Eye credit: wiki. Sauron credit: lotr.fandom.com)
16/16 But to hear Scott’s hypothesis on why there are two lightened plumes around a single-engine Mars lander, you’ll need to watch his excellent video, here!
Appendix: I had intended to mention that clearly some of the streaks come from rocks (circled in yellow), but clearly others do not (circled in blue). Nature is complicated.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Phil Metzger

Dr. Phil Metzger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrPhiltill

21 Jul
@interplanetary I worry about the disproportionate political power of the wealthy, but AFAICT the idea we can fund social problems from their wealth makes no sense. (And I do support social programs that are pragmatic — I’m not arguing against that. I’m politically 100% moderate.) 1/n
@interplanetary 2/ The main problem with the idea that taxing the wealthy will fix things is that most of their “wealth” is not liquid but is the valuation of companies they (co-)own, which cannot be converted into food, medical services, or housing w/o dismantling the companies. And...
@interplanetary 3/ ...mist of the value of the companies is the intangible organization of materials, skills, knowledge, customer channels, and processes that make them productive. By disassembling the companies to get something else instead you destroy not convert that value, by definition.
Read 13 tweets
17 Jul
True! Short thread 🧵

First, this article is an example from 2017 of NASA stating that NASA budgets are not enough to do Mars missions: arstechnica.com/science/2017/0…
(2) An example from 2013, former NASA Admin Bolden explaining that NASA cannot afford to do Mars missions because it can only afford to build SLS and Orion. It cannot afford transfer vehicles, landers, Mars habitat & power systems, ascent vehicle, etc. spacenews.com/37808bolden-ca…
(3) The Agency finally realized and admitted in the mid 2010s that it needed to develop a new economic strategy if it wanted to ever get to Mars. It did, & called the strategy “Sustainable Exploration.” It had about 10 bullet points, including the following ideas...
Read 20 tweets
15 Jul
I agree with the piece on this: there are risks as we enter space. We must solve them! But IMO the piece is not a real ethics argument since it weighs only risks, not benefits, & the arguments fall short of justifying th claim that forcing ppl to stay on Earth is pragmatic & good
I would argue it this way instead: we can't pragmatically keep the cat in the box (considering global realpolitik) even if it were good to do so. But it isn't good to do so, becoz the benefits vastly outweigh the risks & becoz the risks are inherently solvable. Therefore,...
...the best way forward--indeed the only pragmatic way forward--is for nations that value ethics (as imperfect as we are) to do the *best we can* in leading ethically and proactively, so we are operating from the best possible position to create a good outcome. But that means...
Read 10 tweets
11 Jul
I might as well dive into the other argument, too. Kármán Line vs. 50 miles up. Where does space begin?

Well let’s start by saying the Kármán line is based on a silly thought experiment so it provides no real basis to define the limit of space. It means nothing and is silly.
2/ The Kármán altitude is based on how fast a vehicle has to travel to produce enough aerodynamic lift on its wings to support its weight. It depends on how thin the atmosphere is. The higher you go, the thinner the air, so the faster you must move to use wings to stay up. But...
3/ If you go fast enough, then ignoring atmospheric drag you would not need wings at all because you’d be in orbit. So the height where the required speed to use wings is the same as the speed if there were no air — that is the Kármán altitude. But.../
Read 10 tweets
11 May
A paper just came out analyzing rocket exhaust blowing lunar soil. It is important for at least 2 reasons. 1/n

Reference: Chinnapan et al., "Modeling of dusty gas flows due to plume impingement on a lunar surface," Physics of Fluids 33, 053307 (2021) aip.scitation.org/doi/full/10.10….
2/n First, there is great uncertainty in how *fast* the lunar dust goes. It is hard to model rocket exhaust physics on the Moon because fluid flow equations break down as the gas spreads into vacuum. The relevant equation is the Navier-Stokes equation. (screenshot from Wikipedia)
3/n In that equation, the constant μ is gas viscosity. It is not really a fundamental thing in nature. It was invented by averaging lots of molecules bouncing in a small volume of space. It tells us how much the momentum from one volume diffuses into nearby volumes.
Read 14 tweets
8 May
I love this quote for so many reasons, I’m going to translate it into a modern writing style. 1/n
“It used to be there weren’t many people bold enough to cross the ocean, but now it’s so easy even fearful and faint-hearted people can cross it. So maybe someone will invent a way to travel to the Moon, even though it seems like such a terrible voyage across vast, empty sky! /2
[I’m translating a mix of two versions of his book to get his entire thought.]

“And without a doubt there will be bold people to take that venture, just like crossing the sea!

You might be thinking we have no way to sail into the sky, unless the poet’s fantasies were true.

/3
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(