• roughly a quarter of a million (250k) children did not cope well with changes during the pandemic
• 42% of children are worried about new illnesses/pandemics
• 24% of children are ‘quite’ or ‘very’ worried about their mental health (vs 17% in 2019)
• 61% of parents reported the ‘slight’ or ‘very’ negative impact homeschooling had on family life
• 43% of parents said there had been a ‘slight’ or ‘very’ negative impact on children’s happiness in the household
• the pandemic ‘might have exacerbated existing inequalities’
• three fifths of parents say the pandemic had a negative impact on their child’s education
• 2 in 5 parents said children were less happy with their schoolwork progress compared to before the pandemic
• not being able to see friends was rated the hardest aspect by children
• on vaccines, 62% of children said they would like to get the Covid-19 vaccine when available, with 38% either disagreeing or undecided
• overall, an estimated 306,000 (or 7%) 10‑15 year olds in the UK are unhappy with their lives (up from 173,000 a decade ago)
• encouragingly, 72% of children feel positive about their future. But 28% are not optimistic or indifferent
“I feel angry. Angry that with each passing year the joy of British childhood seems to be slipping away,” says chief executive of the Children’s Society, Mark Russell.
Things like physical appearance, societal pressure, & school-life are big contributory factors in these overall results.
Nonetheless, the mental burden Covid-19 restrictions have placed on many children, and how it impacts poorer communities the most, is deeply concerning.
ENDS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There was once a time, in the now dark & distant past, when journalists would craft their stories with balance and panache. Using credible sources to add “weight” to an article.
I’m about to tell you what today’s crop of “journalists” do👇🏻
But first, a bit of background. Yesterday @beverleyturner debated @DrNighatArif on @thismorning over the proposed rollout of Covid-19 vaccines to 12-year-old children.
Safe to say, it was a lively affair. But it’s important to note it was a more balanced interview than usual.
Both guests had opportunity to speak, and the presenters remained largely impartial throughout.
Dr Arif was representing an organisation called @projecthalo which is part of the United Nations “Verified” initiative. It is regularly promoted by big tech companies like YouTube.
Today four brave care professionals, including a husband and wife, lift the lid on the appalling conditions facing residents and staff in England’s care homes, exacerbated by the looming mandatory vaccination deadline.
Read more👇🏻
Through their courageous & very personal testimonies, I can reveal an alleged litany of failings inc:
• care homes at breaking point & residents left to wet themselves in isolation
• staff sobbing in corridors & regularly working illegal shift patterns due to under resourcing
• “endless pressure” and “bullying” from central HR teams to coerce employees into having the vaccine
• mental health insinuations against those choosing not to be vaccinated
• minimum wage carers pressurised into work when previously sick, who now face losing their jobs.
Themes like lockdown, like vaccine passports, and like bodily autonomy/mandatory vaccinations. Issues that have a solid foundation from which to argue our point of view; issues which, with some gentle persuasion, members of the public at large could/should get energised about.
You are not going to believe this one (or maybe you will), but bear with me. I had to triple check my figures on this just to reassure myself it was true.
And what’s more, this is likely to be happening every single day.
More👇🏻
Last night the esteemed @BBCHughPym, BBC health editor since March 2014, ran a seemingly alarming story about the Covid-19 situation in the North East, as you can see below.
With interviews from a respiratory consultant, medical director, elected city mayor, and local resident.
It featured as a segment on the 6 o’clock news, 10 o’clock news, @BBCNEandCumbria, as well as being one of the top stories online (see screenshot).
I have no way of calculating the audience reach but we can safely assume it was into the millions, nationwide and regionally.
Yesterday evening, in the House of Commons, Members of Parliament were instructed to vote on some of the most important draft legislation in decades:
Health & Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) (Amendment) (Coronavirus) Regulations 2021👇🏻
British politicians were asked to support proposals that will effectively abandon long-held principles in this country of voluntary and informed consent, as outlined here in black and white on the NHS’ website.
A huge decision with wide-ranging moral and social ramifications.
Not since the nineteenth century, 1898 to be precise, has the UK entertained the idea of compulsory vaccination, recognising the moral, religious, & scientific objections of doing so.
Yet this amended legislation would compel *anyone* entering a care home setting to be jabbed.
For 16 months the government & its scientific advisors have avoided any kind of scrutiny. The Downing Street press conference sham is evidence; where “journalists” ask narrative-driven, pre-prepared & sanctioned questions👇🏻
When have you ever heard them ask about the China lab leak? About natural immunity? About the risks of the vaccines? About the flawed PCR tests? About the cost/benefit analysis of lockdowns? About the impartiality of SAGE? About the planned lies and fear? Never, is the answer.
Those questions are only ever asked by the public on forums like Twitter- never by journalists - & even then Big Tech censor many of these important questions.
The result has been the rise of the Covid cult (💙), of covidians, a movement steeped in ideology rather than science.