As Lee Kwan Yew said of 'Asian values', a society can only uphold social, cultural, economic, or constitutional rights when their state is able to defend their sovereignty from external interference.
That is the shared vision behind the 1993 Bangkok Declaration on Human Rights.
Under 'Asian values', concepts like "individual freedoms and rights" only have meaning when:
- people have basic material needs fulfilled, and thus the ability to demand such rights; and
- their state has the sovereignty and capacity to recognise, grant, and enforce such rights.
The term 'Asian values' does not mean that all countries in Asia have the same culture or values.
It means they share a common interest in defining their states in line with their own political philosophies, without needing the consent or approval of external powers or hegemons.
They also share an understanding of the purpose of the state and its relationship to society and/or the individual, through their internalisation of classical Hindu and Confucian political philosophy.
Where the state is responsible for collective outcomes, not individual rights.
Combined with the modern recognition that the concepts of "democracy" and "human rights" have been appropriated and weaponised by Western powers as a stick with which they seek to maintain their geopolitical and economic dominance over their former colonies in Asia and beyond.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Seventy-three years ago, Israel made a promise to India's Jews it didn't keep. It invited them to 'return to the promised land' but went back on its word.
"Many Indian Jews packed up their lives and livelihoods and 'made the Aliyah', a religious phrase that describes 'moving to the Land of Israel'.
They had no idea just how miserable they would be."
"The homes assigned to Indian Jews were tents, wooden huts and tin houses, whereas European Jews were assigned more permanent structures including apartments and even fully furnished villas.
European Jews were put up in hotels until permanent accommodation could be allotted."
No need to imagine, it was called West Germany, where Christian Democrats claimed the US executing Nazis was 'un-Christian'.
"This change of course enabled many forrmer Nazis to return to prominent positions in politics and business in the emerging West German postwar republic."
“The so-called conquest was accomplished with the sword and the cross. Thousands of people were murdered during this period. A culture was imposed, one civilization on top of another...where Catholic churches were constructed on top of the temples of pre-Hispanic peoples.” - AMLO
“A society needs to know where it comes from to know where it is going,” Claudia Sheinbaum, Mexico’s City mayor,said at a forum last month detailing plans for the occasion. “How can we resolve some of our great problems if we don’t know where they began?”
"Both Spain and the Vatican have rebuffed the president’s demands for apologies. Events from five centuries ago cannot be judged by “contemporary considerations,” the Spanish government said."
"In 1968, East Germany went about adopting a constitution ... Rather than simply imposing this new document, as the ruling SED could have easily done, it instead chose a more labour-intensive option: a mass national discussion followed by a plebiscite."
"[N]early a million events and meetings were held throughout the GDR to discuss the contents of the proposed constitution ... , the constitutional commission received more than 12,000 letters and post cards from East Germans, expressing their support, concerns, and criticisms."
"The vast number of meetings and discussions surrounding the adoption of the new constitution were meant to both educate the public and ensure their participation in the final vote."
"Shall declare an offence punishable by law all dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred, incitement to racial discrimination, ... all acts of violence or incitement to such acts against any race or group of persons of another colour or ethnic origin"
"Representation of ideas or theories, which advocates, promotes or incites hatred, discrimination or violence, against any individual or group of individuals, based on race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin, as well as religion if used as a pretext for any of these"
"Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to ensure that the following intentional conduct is punishable:
Publicly inciting to violence or hatred directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, colour, religion,descent..."
"We are often told that the poor are grateful for charity. Some of them are, no doubt, but the best amongst the poor are never grateful. They are ungrateful, discontented, disobedient, and rebellious. They are quite right to be so."
"Charity they feel to be a ridiculously inadequate mode of partial restitution, or a sentimental dole, usually accompanied by some impertinent attempt on the part of the sentimentalist to tyrannise over their private lives."