Negative responses to today's column tend to focus on lot on CA's homeless problem, which I acknowledge. But I find myself thinking about our tendency to give too much weight to the misery we see, versus that we don't 1/ nytimes.com/2021/08/26/opi…
Texas, with cheap housing, has many fewer homeless. But almost a quarter of nonelderly lack health insurance, compared with 11% in CA 3/ kff.org/other/state-in…
The thing is, the tragedy of families that can't afford necessary health care takes place effectively off camera and doesn't offend one's eyes. Does that make it unimportant 4/
Overall, Texas life expectancy is 2.4 years shorter than CA. That means that there must be many invisible tragedies 5/ cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom…
Some of these tragedies involve children: CA has a low infant mortality rate, TX a high one, but again that's off camera 6/ cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom…
We should always acknowledge problems; the CA housing crisis is real, and is causing a lot of harm. But we should fight placing special emphasis on problems that happen to be visible to upper-middle-class eyes 7/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Biden's vaccine mandate is terrific public policy; it is, more or less literally, what the doctor ordered. Is it good politics? We don't know. But one thing worth noting is the contrast with Obama 1/
It's now clear that Republicans effectively sabotaged Obama's economy, slowing the recovery, by imposing fiscal austerity (using completely false claims that they were worried about debt.) And Obama was basically passive, even accepting their premises 2/
Rs are now sabotaging Biden by undermining the fight against Covid; how self-conscious they are about this is something we can argue, but that's how it's working out. And having blocked basic public health measures, they're all set to blame Biden for Covid's persistence 3/
Ricardo Reis is asking the right question: the current rate of inflation, or even the rate over the next year plus, matters less than whether pricing behavior starts to build in expectations of future inflation 1/ brookings.edu/bpea-articles/…
Historically, we've had episodes of high inflation that didn't get built in, and faded quickly; the 70s was exceptional 2/
But how can we tell? Not sure that surveys are the best or at least only approach. Suggestion: look at price- and wage-setting behavior 3/
Responses to this confirm something I've observed before: nothing gets people angrier than monetary theory. Say that Trump is a traitor and they yawn; say that fiat money works and they scream incoherently 1/ nytimes.com/2021/09/03/opi…
Two points I'd like to clarify. As some point out, Hayek eventually endorsed monetary stimulus in a depression. But he was very much a liquidationist in the 1930s, which is when it mattered 2/
Second, some object to my grouping Hayek with Schumpeter, because they had different stories about overinvestment: Schumpeter emphasized innovation, Hayek loose money. But that misses the point 3/
Mississippi has passed a grim milestone: Its total Covid deaths per capita exceed the toll in New York, which mostly happened early in the pandemic when we didn't know much about the disease — and didn't have vaccines 1/
One observation: early on people thought the pandemic was a problem for densely populated urban areas. But MS is very rural 2/
In fact, at this point there's a negative correlation between density and Covid death rates (7-day average) 3/
A crazy process and lack of attention could give California a Trumpist governor. Watching the horror show, I started looking at how CA has fared since 2010, when progressives took power. Did you know that its economy grew as fast as Texas'? 1/
CA also matched TX employment growth 2/
Where CA did badly — and it did very, very badly — was housing, where the NIMBYs prevented remotely adequate construction 3/
Tooze is really good on this — the problem with the War on Terror is NOT that it added to the national debt — but a little off-base, I think, in suggesting that WWII marked a sharp break with previous fiscal orthodoxy 1/
Certainly it wasn't the first time Britain went there. WWI was also paid for with a massive increase in debt — and so, a bit more slowly, were the Napoleonic Wars! 2/
Chart. I'm familiar with this stuff bc of all the people back circa 2010 saying that Keynes would have had different views if Britain had been deeply in debt — which, in fact, it was when he wrote 3/