So one single narcotics detective has finally been caught testilying, and now hundreds of cases are in question. I want to tell you about my personal experience with this fool, and about how the scale of impact here is much, much bigger than it seems. nytimes.com/2021/04/06/nyr…
I tried a case with this guy involved. My client had to go to trial because he was completely innocent, had no drugs on his person or in his home (where he was arrested, in front of his kids), no money, no scales, no nothing. But charges were still pressed...
They were still pressed because this one undercover--the guy in the NYT story above--insisted he bought drugs from the guy with no drugs. It was the Bronx, and NYT has effectively no speedy trial rule, so this case lingered for OVER A YEAR.
So we took it to trial, and my innocent client was found not guilty. Good. But let's unpack what this tells you about what this cop did.
He cost an innocent man over a year of his life--of having an open felony, of having to explain this to employers, of having to take time to come to court every month, of having to explain this to his kids, of having been arrested in front of his family, of being jailed.
That man is not in the 90 cases being counted in Brooklyn or the 150 on which the @BronxDAClark sure as hell better do something. Those are *convictions.* Presumably, those are the cases in which either his lies worked or he got lucky. BUT--
When the narcotics team goes out to do a night of buy & busts, they don't do just one. They bring a van to fill with people and as far as I can tell they don't go back to the station until the van is full. There are nights where they hit eight locations or more.
The goal at every location is to put someone in that van. If you have an undercover like this, it's possible he could snag 10+ people... who could be falsely arrested on every shift he does. Think about how many shifts he might work/week. Think of years of this.
Patrol cops are supposed to cruise around looking for crime or responding to calls. But undercovers are uniquely empowered to manufacture crime, because they're sent out to trick people into breaking the law and may be doing so with no eyes on them. Their word as their bond.
All of which is to say--they may have figured out that this dude's lies convicted hundreds of people. Which cannot be made right--you can't give people years of their lives back. But at least those case are under review.
The people who will truly never recover here are the people who were wrongly arrested but not convicted--technically, for them, the system "got it right" even though they were put in cuffs, put in a cage, possibly injured, separated from their families.
Even if they spent months or years living their lives under the terror of a felony charge. Even if they lost their job or their apartment. Even if it fractured their most intimate relationships.
The harm a cop like this does is impossible to truly calculate. It's under-estimated here and the people he hurt will never have a real opportunity to recover. Think of how that disempowerment feels, and let that feeling flow into how you view our criminal legal system.
Oh and one last thing--we were able to go to trial &win in spite of these lies bcI was with @BronxDefenders and we were strong, trained, and had the resources to deliver phenomenal defense. Everyone, when facing the legal system, should have a team like that. #FundPublicDefense.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Equal pay ≠ enough. We need staffing, infrastructure, funding for collaborations & community facing initiatives. For policy work informed by real world experience. For training. For technology. For case loads that allow us to have all the time to do all the things clients need.
People in the policy/legislative world often don't realize how hard it is to make great policy actually reach the people it is supposed to reach. That's that's the role of those of us on the ground. And to ensure we can fulfill that role, we need to #FundPublicDefense
So, I'm learning a lot from today's #TwitterThon with @JoshuaBHoe asking the President to commute the sentences of the 4,500 people who were safely released--pre-screened--and who have been living without incident at home for over a year. A thread.
I have thought a lot about what this system does to the people in it. After all, I have worked in it--in various roles--for about 10 years. And so when I think of accused people, I don't think of "offenders," but rather of very real people I know well and care about deeply.
So the group of people who we could classify as system users--the accused--are as varied a group as any group of humans. Some have caused harm. Many haven't. Few have caused as much harm as they're accused of. And all are actively being harmed, to extreme degrees, by our system.
Good morning everyone. I'm joining @JoshuaBHoe to stage a 24 hour effort calling on @POTUS to #KeepThemHome. You may not know this, but several thousand people were screened to be sent home from prison to weather the pandemic. forbes.com/sites/walterpa…
Now, @POTUS is signaling that they will be sent back--many for years. These are folks who were screened for safety, released, and have had a 99.9% success rate. They have jobs, families, lives. There is zero safety reason to return them to prison. forbes.com/sites/walterpa…
If this seems unfair to you. If this bothers you.If you want to end mass incarceration. If you want kids to be with their parents. If you want families intact. If you want more potential workers in a community. Join us in asking to #KeepThemHome.
This is an important perspective on the Westfall Act. But it's also much more than that, in the way @tribelaw speaks on the relationship between access to justice and the health of a democracy (indulge me in a super short thread where I relate this back to public defense)
The law is only the law in that it is *perceived* as the law. The way people *experience* our legal structures is, in fact, the way they exist in the real world--and the way most people experience the law is as byzantine, protective of the powerful, oppressive to the powerless.
The subject matter here is the limit of "official duty" and of course we know that Trump stretched that notion harder than he stretches his golf pants, and this resulted in the widespread perception that the law is nothing more than tool of the ruling class.
This is a BIG DEAL and will need a *lot* of public support to pass. If you care about ending police violence, you should care about this bill. Here's why.
Delaware, unlike basically every other state, has a weird law in place that actually *shields records of police misconduct* from public view.
You read that right: not *any* police records, records of actual wrongdoing.
They're secret.
The "bad apples" get protection.
The legal shielding afforded to bad cops in DE plays out as repeated instances of violence, and the thing we all fear about violent cops: the ability to hop around from town to town, leaving a wake of state violence against Black & Brown people.
I don't come from a journalism background. I was a public defender, and still consider myself to be one, honestly. In the law, a profession where ability to represent *any* position is *essential,* we still generally recognize that humans are humans with their own perspectives.
When I started doing journalistic work with, working for The Appeal and hosting Appeal Live, it was incredibly strange to me to encounter media norms, in which one is expected to take on a pretense of inhuman, unrealistic neutrality.
This case isn't even a close one--things you said or did long before you had a job, generally, aren't the kind of *on the job* things that can get you fired...unless you're into pretending that journalists aren't humans with human perspectives.