Thread by @GruaBernard

I proposed an agreement to Ms Ramla Akhtar (@GruaAbusedArkive, @BetterInventory) so that she could come back to the real world and handle a normal life. It clearly states it does not deprive her for her right to deal with justice.

To make sure Ms Ramla Akhtar (@GruaAbuseArkive & @BetterInventory) is aware of the proposed agreement, a link to the text, in her Messenger box, was posted on one her Facebook pages, "Rmala's Project".

Ms Ramla Akhtar did not read the proposed agreement. Instead she presented it as a way to escape the course of justice. This is a false interpretation.

Here below are the attachments to Ms Ramla Akhtar tweet where she falsely interpret a proposed agreement she did not read.

However, Ms Ramla Akhtar should understand she will not succeed in her cyberstalking campaign in which she already lost more than 2 years. She should take the opportunity of the proposed agreement to come back, if she can, to a normal life and to comply with her parental duties.

I don't know if Ms Ramla Akhtar (@GruaAbuseArkive, @BetterInventory) will act according to her interest and her duty. However,I had to propose this agreement so that I could evidence I did my best efforts to solve this case. It is still open at: facebook.com/messages/t/348…

Let's conclude by reminding that the regular course of justice is highly expected. This is a complete separate topic of this cyberstalking case, which is unlawful, destructive and which will only result in disastrous achievements.

Ramla Akhtar wrote, today: "I will have you prosecuted and legally condemned." This is what she has to do. Why she does not act according to what she announces for more than 2 years. Let's close this case on a civilized way.

@threadreaderapp unroll