@maut_apbm@CAUT_ACPPU Our policies predate the existence of the technology to teach remotely. They simply don't address it--so they will need to at some point. But McGill spent the last year arguing remote teaching is a great substitution for in person (to support enrollment).
@maut_apbm@CAUT_ACPPU So basically this memo is instructing deans to instruct chairs to bully faculty who are at risk or have at risk family members into endangering themselves and their family members.
And for what? It think you get like a $5k salary bump to be department chair here?
It is striking to contrast the @mcgillu administration's refusal to use a power they do have (a vaccinate mandate) with their eagerness to use a power they don't have (threatening faculty for choosing their own mode of instruction).
@mcgillu Very difficult to argue that a mode of instruction that is in use now, has been used for the last 18 months, and is supported by university IT infrastructure is somehow not an acceptable form of course delivery at this university.
@mcgillu My heart goes out to colleagues with medical concerns in their family, unvaccinated children, etc. You don't deserve these demeaning threats while you continue to make extraordinary efforts to protect your family and educate your students.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Happy #McGill200! Some of you may have heard that @mcgillu is opposed to a vaccination mandate... this is not true! McGill University is a research and learning community of students, faculty, and staff who've all been worn pretty thin by the pandemic. 1/5
So it's no surprise that McGill University--from our health scientists and legal experts to our faculty (@maut_apbm) and student (@theSSMU) associations--is in fact strongly in favor of a vaccine mandate that would allow us to teach, learn, and work as safely as possible. 2/5
However, a small group of employees who have been entrusted with a lot of power--power intended for the promotion and support of our academic mission--refuse to act. Perhaps in order to avoid political discomfort, but we don't know. No credible reasons have been given. 3/5
Gender disparities exists in many aspects of science: a fact. The question--or argument--is why. Many causes have been proposed. Almost all of them are non-mutually exclusive, and many of them are difficult if not impossible to separate. /1
Let’s say for a given cause, the weight of that cause on disparate outcomes can be anywhere from 0 to 100. What we are ostensibly arguing about is these weights. /2
There are some causes that I think have run their course and zeroed out, like the “early pipeline” explanation—it states that girls and/or young woman aren’t interested in or don’t pursue science for some reason. Its primary appeal was that research institutions can't fix it. /3