@Charles4Freedom @NeuroLatina @500ws_montreal @500womensci @AdmirableWomen @WomenDoingSci @etilmercurio @McLNeuro @DrJenGunter @steminist Women get less credit for the same contribution/effort on publications. Macaluso et al. 2016; Feldon et al. 2017
@Charles4Freedom @NeuroLatina @500ws_montreal @500womensci @AdmirableWomen @WomenDoingSci @etilmercurio @McLNeuro @DrJenGunter @steminist Women receive lower teaching evaluations despite equal teaching effectiveness, Boring et al. 2016; MacNell et al. 2015
@Charles4Freedom @NeuroLatina @500ws_montreal @500womensci @AdmirableWomen @WomenDoingSci @etilmercurio @McLNeuro @DrJenGunter @steminist Women are far more likely to experience harassment at work. Clancy et al. 2017; Guarino et al. 2017
@Charles4Freedom @NeuroLatina @500ws_montreal @500womensci @AdmirableWomen @WomenDoingSci @etilmercurio @McLNeuro @DrJenGunter @steminist Women’s careers suffer after parental leave while men’s are enhanced by leave. Antecol et al. 2016
@Charles4Freedom @NeuroLatina @500ws_montreal @500womensci @AdmirableWomen @WomenDoingSci @etilmercurio @McLNeuro @DrJenGunter @steminist Women receive smaller start-ups as assistant professors. Sege et al. 2015
@Charles4Freedom @NeuroLatina @500ws_montreal @500womensci @AdmirableWomen @WomenDoingSci @etilmercurio @McLNeuro @DrJenGunter @steminist Papers are less likely to be accepted when reviewers know the author is a woman compared to when they are blinded. Budden et al. 2008.
@Charles4Freedom @NeuroLatina @500ws_montreal @500womensci @AdmirableWomen @WomenDoingSci @etilmercurio @McLNeuro @DrJenGunter @steminist A fictitious woman receives lower competence rating from other scientists than a fictitious man with the same CV. Moss-Racusin et al. 2018
@Charles4Freedom @NeuroLatina @500ws_montreal @500womensci @AdmirableWomen @WomenDoingSci @etilmercurio @McLNeuro @DrJenGunter @steminist The same application for PhD receives fewer email responses from professors is the applicant is identifiable as a woman. Milkman et al. 2015.
@Charles4Freedom @NeuroLatina @500ws_montreal @500womensci @AdmirableWomen @WomenDoingSci @etilmercurio @McLNeuro @DrJenGunter @steminist Reviewers assess women less favorably for the same productivity in fellowship applications. assessed equal productivity less positively for female versus male fellowship applicants. Wenneras and Wold 1997.
@Charles4Freedom @NeuroLatina @500ws_montreal @500womensci @AdmirableWomen @WomenDoingSci @etilmercurio @McLNeuro @DrJenGunter @steminist Women received lower grant scores than men after controlling for h-index, funding history, and myriad other potential confounders. Tamblyn et al. 2018
@Charles4Freedom @NeuroLatina @500ws_montreal @500womensci @AdmirableWomen @WomenDoingSci @etilmercurio @McLNeuro @DrJenGunter @steminist Women receive equal scores as men when reviewers assess scientific proposals, but lower scores when reviewers assess the applicant. Witteman et al. 2018
@Charles4Freedom @NeuroLatina @500ws_montreal @500womensci @AdmirableWomen @WomenDoingSci @etilmercurio @McLNeuro @DrJenGunter @steminist Go polish your gun, Mr. Freedom, and cry about how unfair the world has been to you.
