Contrarian view on the dog situation: While they are clearly splitting hairs on “military working dog” (attacks on command, navigates tunnels, $100’s of thousands of dollars investment) and “contract working dogs” (bomb/drug sniffing, security, etc). 1/
And definitely parse this whole “did not leave any dogs in cages” line carefully (especially as it increasingly appears they let them OUT of the cages instead of leaving them to die in the cages)… clearly deliberate obfuscation.
But…
2/
Whether one sees a qualitative difference to the two classes of dogs or not (and setting aside the fact they’re deliberately obfuscating on this), was this really the US Government’s responsibility??
3/
It was likely “less important” dogs that were the responsibility of the contractor… who apparently found a shelter willing to take them… so it’s entirely possible everyone did their jobs right and honorably on this.
4/
Problem is the shelter owner then tries to evacuate them all without regard to any other sense of perspective (shelter owners are like that — which is usually a good thing!)
Does the US Government’s responsibility extend to every dog shelter with a good social media game??
5/
6/6 You may or may not agree with my take on the dogs, but I hope we can all agree on the cats:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Increasingly obvious —though rarely acknowledged— that the multiple-missing-laptops disclosure implicates far more than the Biden family’s risk to improper Russian and Chinese influence… no, a careful analysis of the timeline shows *they* knew — THEY knew! 1/
When “50 Former Intelligence Officials” quickly came out with the “hallmarks of Russian disinformation” cover-story, it was because they instinctively believed the stolen laptop/Russian blackmail storyline over other explanations — because THEY KNEW ABOUT IT! 2/
When the “Hunter left his laptop with a blind IT guy from Podunk, DE” story hit, they genuinely thought it was the crack-addled chickens coming home to roost. THEY KNEW HOW SUSCEPTIBLE BIDEN WAS TO FOREIGN INFLUENCE ALL ALLONG!! 3/
Remarkable.
“Tell me you’re above the chain of command without saying you’re above the chain of company.”
SECDEF conspires with media to shape public narrative and conspire against the Commander in Chief, and we all just yawn??
“Managing up” is a necessary skill at all levels; actively subverting your boss when your position of public trust demands otherwise —and is conditioned on your abiding by these rules — is inexcusable (and shameful).
The breakdown of what used to be called “good order and discipline” within the military over the last two decades is an existential threat to our country. It won’t end well.
This write-up by @EWErickson takes a skeptical view of the whole Shadow Campaign to “steal” the election detailed in Time magazine. It’s worth the read, but Erick misses three key points:
(1) it doesn’t acknowledge how the gatekeepers in the media utterly failed us by intentionally choosing sides and putting the thumb on the scale to intentionally advocate for one side. This matters.
It shaped public opinion and if you give it an honest analysis, it deliberately and systematically promoted misinformation and actively suppressed information detrimental to Biden. Yes, the media has always shaped opinion this way, but it was beyond anything we have saw before.
I expect the Texas case to be dismissed under the basic premise that the floor of Congress on Jan 6th is the preferred venue to adjudicate these types of questions. Which is probably true. But don’t expect either chamber to have an epiphany that day.
That SCOTUS kicked Kelly’s PA case shows they have zero appetite to even wade into this mess even a little. Sad, because on the questions raised there, SCOTUS is the proper & only venue. I guess we should cheer now because PA gets to ignore their Constitution because Federalism??
The only thing I’m still really looking out for is the dissent(s) in the Texas case. If they just dismiss the case with an unsigned order it will be incredibly damaging to whatever collective trust in SCOTUS is left.
I asked the other day if the media would be able to suspend its hatred of @realDonaldTrump long enough to honestly report on the vaccine roll-out. @jaketapper gives us our first insight here:
I can't wait till the media takes the inevitable anecdotes about vaccine injury & side effects greater than expected and blow them out of proportion just to blame Trump for rushing things. 100% chance they risk public health as they chase their catnip.
And to be clear, vaccine injury is a real thing. Unexpected drug interactions are a real thing. I say this not to cast doubt or cause anyone to tap the brakes. The science is “proven” but it isn’t “perfect”. This nuance won't be reported honestly.
A failure by the Republican Party to honestly process that millions of Americans are turned off by Trump, but otherwise warm to Republican governance and not widespread vote-altering fraud will cause the Republican Party to miss the most important lesson of this election.
A failure by the Democrat Party to honestly process that the only reason those votes ended up on the board was unprecedented late-in-the-game changes to drop nearly all absentee ballot security measures, driven by an orchestrated and well funded law-fare campaign...
... implemented by rabid partisans willing to ignore the law to oust Orange Man and not widespread acceptance of their message and ideology will cause the Democrat Party to miss the most important lesson of this election.