In 2018, 🇺🇸 got serious about 🇨🇳 influence campaigns in America - particularly in our universities.

But Beijing has begun pushing back, in ways policymakers have yet to address. @Joshua_Eisenman & I explain in @ForeignPolicy.

🧵1/x foreignpolicy.com/2021/08/31/chi…
For the past three years, Congress has had a three-part response to CCP influence campaigns:

(1) singling out complicit institutions

See UT-Austin and the LBJ School's attempt to take $$ from CCP-backed China-US Exchange Foundation $2 million

2/x washingtonpost.com/opinions/globa…
(2) leveraging federal funds

See 2019 NDAA provision that pressured colleges w/ DOD-funded foreign language programs to shutter their Confucius Institutes.

3/x washingtonpost.com/news/josh-rogi…
(3) compelling disclosure.

This was a Trump Admin play that culminated in an investigation into top-tier American universities. It uncovered $6.5 billion in unreported foreign funding.

4/x www2.ed.gov/policy/highere…
Between these three efforts, Washington gained lots of momentum and - seemingly - put universities w/ CCP cash on the defensive.

To wit: @NASorg tracked the closure of 65 Confucius Institutes from 2017-2021. nas.org/blogs/article/…

5/x
But the problem hasn't disappeared. The CCP has evolved and adapted to these tactics.

When UT-Austin turned down CCP funding, the man behind the effort (David Firestein) went to run @GHWBushChina, and successfully got CUSEF funding.

6/x axios.com/scoop-bush-fam…
Earlier this year, @SenFeinstein accepted a "lifetime achievement award" from the Bush China Foundation - and ultimately, from CUSEF and the Chinese Communist Party. Ditto Henry Kissinger.

7/x
Regarding universities...many have simply refused to disclose funding. Others have closed or renamed their Confucius Institutes to work around pressure from Washington and keep the CCP cash flowing.

8/x
realcleareducation.com/articles/2021/…
Big lesson for policymakers: annual disclosure requirements for universities and a ban on all congressional engagement with such groups are essential first measures—but alone, they are insufficient to stop the flow of CCP-linked funding into U.S. educational institutions.

9/x
Barring a change of heart from Beijing, Congress should restrict the types of gifts and donations American universities can accept from CCP-backed sources.

Policymakers must protect the integrity & reputations of our universities.

/end foreignpolicy.com/2021/08/31/chi…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Sobolik

Michael Sobolik Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelsobolik

14 Sep
🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼🇹🇼

Upgrading TECRO's name to include "Taiwan" isn't the threat many fear it to be -- nor is it the strategic win others hope it could be.

🧵 1/x
Per @Dimi @FT, the Biden Administration is actively considering this step - specifically, changing the name of Taiwan's de facto embassy from “Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office” to “Taiwan Representative Office." 2/x ft.com/content/07810e…
This change is significant for two reasons: the removal of "economic & cultural," and the substitution of "Taiwan" for "Taipei."

3/x
Read 32 tweets
30 Aug
Good competitive strategies flow from net assessments. If we want to compete effectively against the CCP, we need to identify their weaknesses first.

A particular (and peculiar) weakness for Xi Jinping: Maoism.

My latest, in @TheNatlInterest nationalinterest.org/feature/mao%E2…
True, Xi literally copy-pasted Mao’s cult-of-personality playbook to secure his hold on power.

But Maoism is also giving voice to millions of Chinese who increasingly wonder whether Xi’s “China Dream” applies to them.
Even as China’s economy has boomed over the past three decades, income inequality has bedeviled the nation. Today, roughly six hundred million Chinese—nearly double America’s population—live off a monthly income of $140. (@LiYuan6 ⤵️) nytimes.com/2020/06/11/bus…
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(