The Taliban’a commander of Kabul airport tells us US troops let their service dogs free as they evacuated.
The dogs are being rounded up, and the Taliban plans to, in an ironic twist, put them back into service for the Islamic Emirate.
(No, they weren’t sentenced to death)
Someone also poured water into bowls and cut open dog food bags for the pooches, before the last US troops left.
We also saw a box full of dog toys and leashes, as well as a crate marked “Doni”
I did find one pupper at Kabul airport, but he was likely a stray. Very scared and evidently traumatized by all the shooting
Here is what the Taliban commander told us about the dogs on camera. Off camera: that they would put them to use, and that they would train those they could
The Taliban’s new Minister of Information, Zabihullah Mojahed has just given us his first formal interview:
“We have a responsibility before the international community never again to let terrorists use Afghanistan as a base of operation”
Taliban Minister of Information: “the Americans must leave in order to end the crisis at Kabul airport. It is they who urged people to come to airport for evacuation, promising them a better life in the West. The people can’t be blamed for believing them”
Taliban’s Minister of Information: “We want good relations with America and Europe. We will honour all existing economic and trade agreements between Afghanistan and all our partners, including Western nations”
American troops called what is happening here “World War Z” - alluding to the zombie movie. It is clear why.
The situation is horrendous.
The entire airport is littered with bullet casings and flash-bang grenades. Everything, absolutely everything is covered in barbed wire. The entire runway (!) is lined with barbed wire.
Shooting is ceaseless, ten minutes don’t pass without gunfire. Either within the airport; American troops scaring away the more daring locals, or shooting near the main entrance, where the Taliban is discouraging would-be refugees.
The first is itended to find out and explain what went wrong.
The second type is intended solely and utterly to cover your ass.
The OPCW opted for the second. Long thread:
OPCW says whistleblower "Inspector A" wasn't part of Fact-Finding Mission, played "minor role"
They then admit:
He was head of Syria HQ
Collected samples from hospital/chemical attack site
Inventorized all info OPCW had on cylinders
Determined what OPCW needed to investigate
OPCW: "Inspector A" didn't have permission to carry out cylinder study (which found cylinders were likely placed at scene). Had "incomplete evidence".
Then, admit they they gave him authorization, and ASKED him inventorize "highly protected" cylinder evidence. So he had info