"President Biden should state explicitly as a matter of policy in his 2021 National Security Strategy that the United States will not use military intervention to promote democratic regime change." THREAD 1/
"The truth is that American presidents have almost never invoked democracy promotion as a justification for war; the U.S. military interventions in Grenada and Panama may be the only exceptions." 2/
"Even before the invasion of Iraq, President Bush and his administration focused primarily on security threats like Saddam Hussein’s alleged weapons of mass destruction." 3/
"Only after intervention and occupation have American presidents pivoted to democracy building." 4/
"We have rarely invaded a country to promote democracy, but have also infrequently exited without attempting to leave a democratic regime behind—usually with poor results." 5/
"Therefore, Biden should make his intentions clear; making a credible commitment to avoiding such wars is also prudent for keeping the United States committed to more salient national security objectives." 6/
"To compete with China and Russia in the 21st century, U.S. decision-makers must avoid ambitious, distracting projects like building democracies in countries that are at war or occupied by American soldiers." 7/ END THREAD americanpurpose.com/articles/somet…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is Item 4 of the Doha agreement: "A permanent and comprehensive ceasefire will be an item on the agenda of the intra-Afghan dialogue and negotiations." THREAD 1/
"The participants of intra-Afghan negotiations will discuss the date & modalities of a permanent and comprehensive ceasefire, including joint implementation
mechanisms, which will be announced along with the completion & agreement over the future
political roadmap of Afghanistan"
Is there any evidence that the Taliban committed to this part of the Doha agreement? If not, then why are we obligated to leave by 8/31? 3/
Seeing lots of revisionist history (on left and right) on Obama's surge in Afghanistan. Im not an expert, but I did work at the WH at the time and do teach that "case" in my comparative foreign policy decision-making course. Posting that section of the syllabus here. THREAD 1/
April 22: The U.S. Decision to escalate the war in Afghanistan (2009-2010)
Guest Speaker: Ambassador Karl Eikenberry 2/
Required Readings:
Obama, Barack H. “Remarks by the President in Address to the Nation on the Way Forward in Afghanistan and Pakistan.” The White House, December 2009. 3/ obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-offi…
A true hero, Sergey Adamovich Kovalev, has passed away today. He was one of the most honest, principled & courageous men I have ever known. I saw him last as my farewell reception in 2014 in Moscow (after which I was put on the sanctions list) speaking here with another friend.
I met Kovalev in 1990. His clarity of conviction back then helped to destroy Soviet dictatorship.
One of the most memorable days of my time as US ambassador to Russia was when Kovakev served as our personal tour guide to me, my wife, and sons at the Sakharov Museum. His stories about the gulag were riveting and horrifying.
During the Cold War, some US leaders praised our autocratic allies & friends as "strong leaders" and labeled Soviet allies as brutal dictators ...THREAD 1/
They sold "constructive engagement" as a policy to democratize apartheid South Africa & celebrated Savimbi in Angola and the mujahadeen in Afghanistan as "freedom fighters." 2/
In our new era of great power competition with China (& Russia), we should learn from our successes during the Cold War, but also learn from our mistakes. 3/
"AFTER GENEVA
Biden is right to test whether Putin might embrace a more stable, predictable relationship with the United States. " THREAD 1/
"Should the Russian president opt instead to continue invading countries, mounting hacking and disinformation campaigns, and arresting innocent Russians and Americans, it will be clear that he, not Biden, is responsible for confrontation with the United States." 2/
Biden is also right to try to work with the Kremlin on a limited agenda of mutual interest, particularly on arms control. Even during tense moments of the Cold War, U.S. presidents saw the wisdom in cooperating with their Soviet counterparts to reduce the risk of nuclear war. 3/
"Biden must provide a counterweight to Putin’s promotion of autocracy." THREAD 1/
"He should continue to speak publicly in support of all those fighting for democracy across the region, from Alexei Navalny in Russia to Svetlana Tikhanovskaya in Belarus to the hundreds of lesser-known political prisoners in both countries." 2/
"His administration should also make it easier for students from Russia and elsewhere in the region to study in the United States; for high-skilled workers to immigrate to the United States; and for political leaders to seek asylum, if necessary." 3/