The tax system in California has been broken for some time, and in a world of increasing remote work, is going to become even more broken.
There is a market for different state income tax rates; you can live in a state with a top income tax rate of 13.3%, or 0%, or many rates in between. Historically, you’ve needed to live near your job, but now for many jobs you don’t.
Some people are choosing to keep their same job but move to a location with a much lower income tax rate. The thing that has worked for California for so long—many of the best jobs in the country requiring big taxpayers to live here—may not keep working.
This trend is probably unstoppable; you can take your job and go somewhere else, and be subject to their tax system. This is probably going to be bad for the state and lead to decreasing revenue; it could lead to a downward spiral.
What you can’t pick up and take with you is real estate. A tax on land has long been a good idea; now it’s a great idea. CA does have a lot of the most desirable land in the country, and many people who are tax residents of somewhere else will still want to own homes here.
We also have a home affordability crisis. This is due to many factors, but two of them are our relatively low property tax rates (Prop 13 is a major contributor) and the policies we have that make building difficult.
So, a simple suggestion for California: get away from the reliance on income tax and the associated problems when people can choose where to live.
Switch to 0% income tax and a high property tax. Drastically reduce all policies that make homebuilding so difficult and expensive.
(A notable problem with this is it makes it hard to tax super rich people “enough”. I’m not sure what the best way to fix that is; maybe the answer is to leave an income tax in place for extremely high income levels.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The costs of intelligence and energy are going to be on a path towards near-zero.
We certainly won’t get all the way there this decade, but by 2030, it will become clear that the AI revolution and renewable+nuclear energy are going to get us there.
(This won't be true for every kind of intelligence--AI will likely be really great at many things and surprisingly bad at others--but enough to change a lot of things.)
It is a rudimentary version of what will be possible, but it really works and will get better fast. Today we can correctly complete a function from our evaluation set about 37% of the time. It's also just really fun to use, and brings back the early joy of programming for me.
I think Codex gets close to what most of us really want from computers—we say what we want, and they do it.
Programming languages are an artifact of computers not being able to actually understand us, and humans and computers relying on a lingua franca to understand each other.
Almost everyone starts off extrinsically motivated to some degree.
Basic version: for most people the levels of the video game go money, power (little power as in managing other people, etc), status (and proving yourself), impact (real power), and finally ‘self-actualization’, eg seeing how good you can be and expressing your curiosity.
All the levels always overlap (most people who do great work were never entirely driven by money, at least not for long, and people on the last level still want more status/ impact), but the mix changes a lot over time. The last level is like infinite Tetris, it never stops.
If you want to have the biggest possible impact in tech, I think you should still move to the Bay Area.
The people here, and the network effects caused by that, are worth it.
It's hard to overstate the magic of lots of competent, optimistic people in one place.
The future will certainly be more distributed, but I think that a large fraction of the most important US companies started in the next decade will continue to be within 50 miles of SF.
It's easy to not be in the Bay Area right now, because there's not much to miss out on. As soon as stuff restarts, and the most interesting meetings, dinners, events, and parties are here, I predict FOMO brings a lot of people back fast :)
The expected value of your impact on the world is like a vector.
It is defined by two things: direction and magnitude. That’s it.
Direction is what you choose to work on. Almost no one spends enough time thinking about this. A useful framework for this is to think on a long-but-not-too-long timescale (10-20 years seems to work),