Reading through the opinions on the Texas abortion law case is a disheartening exercise. The majority opinion is unsigned—and understandably so. I wouldn’t want to put my name on that either. The dissents, on the other hand, all raise good points.

supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
The opinion is careful to say it is not ruling on constitutionality, and claims the law may never be enforced. It does not make a good case for letting an unconstitutional law go into effect because of this. It’s strained, dodgy, and generally feels like Kavanaugh wrote it.
Not Necessarily But Probably Kavanaugh makes the point that since Texas doesn’t enforce the law, instead delegating it, the State can’t be enjoined. That is the point of assaulting women’s rights by mob rather than by criminal code, and apparently the majority is cool with that.
Roberts’ dissent focuses on wanting more briefing and discussion on whether the state can avoid responsibility for its laws the way Texas seeks to do. Very Chief Justice-y in trying to emphasize that the Court isn’t ruling on constitutionality or merits at all.
Breyer’s dissent is a little more pointed: the law is completely unconstitutional, so the State can’t delegate to anyone else enforcement powers it isn’t entitled to hold. The mere threat of enforcement causes imminent harm to a constitutional right, so an injunction is proper.
Sotomayor minces no words: “The Court’s order is stunning.” The law is “flagrantly unconstitutional,” and Definitely Maybe Not Kavanaugh basically allows Texas to flout the Court and the Constitution by playing games. She is absolutely right.
But I’d argue Kagan punches hardest here, because she is hitting the institution itself. She calls out the Court’s “shadow docket decision-making—which every day becomes more unreasoned, inconsistent, and impossible to defend.” And it seems she, too, is absolutely right.
It’s clear the majority of the Court does not respect women’s reproductive rights. But I cannot escape the conclusion that a majority of the Justices also have no respect for the seats in which they sit, or for the role the Court should be playing. This is not justice.
The Supreme Court is tasked with protecting the Constitution and the legal rights of U.S. citizens. Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and Barrett have abdicated that responsibility, under cover of a blatantly contrived procedural gimmick.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff Roush

Jeff Roush Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JeffRoushPoetry

4 Sep
Friday night limericks go out tonight to the always concerned @SenatorCollins:

Susan Collins would have us believe
She’s a moderate-leaning reprieve.
When she gives her next speech
She’ll bemoan and beseech—
And continue her drive to deceive.
Susan claimed she would help protect Roe
Against every faux “right to life” foe.
But when Kavanaugh cried,
And then shouted and lied,
She eschewed right to put on a show.

slate.com/news-and-polit…
Of course, Kavanaugh said if confirmed,
It’s a precedent double-affirmed.
So is Collins a fool,
Or a GOP tool?
It’s no wonder the senator squirmed.

thehill.com/homenews/senat…
Read 4 tweets
22 Jun
The critical race theory really is a perfect microcosm of the GOP approach. Their media outlets and all their dumbest, loudest members are shouting about it, without ever defining it. It has all the racism their party thrives on, proclaiming that even talking about race is bad.
Roll that in with the general disdain for education and a preference for historical myths and simple stories they can package with messages of “good” and “evil,” and they have the means for using talking points and accusations rather than having to develop or confront ideas.
It works for them because it fully pulls in the dumbest of them (think Gohmert, Jordan, Greene) and gives simple messaging for the rest. They never actually do anything, accomplish anything, or contribute anything to the country, because scaring people is a quicker path to power.
Read 4 tweets
19 Jun
So as @Mike_Pence pences about conservative stages, let’s break down his legacy as lead sycophant for what he grossly called the “most pro-life” administration ever:
1. Covid. Trump didn’t create Covid-19 (though he would have if he thought it would play well on Fox and if he were smart enough), but his obfuscations, underplayings, and outright lies made it much worse than it may have been.

businessinsider.com/analysis-trump…
2. Executions. Trump cranked up the state killings like no one in recent memory. Pence’s pro-life begins at conception, and ends when Bill Barr says it does. bbc.com/news/world-us-…
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(