These are the Change of Address (CoA) flags that I told everyone about before and after the 2020 election, which @PolitiFact lied about fake fact-checking me by twisting my words & meaning.
It is REAL. It does happen. In California, voter rolls are VERY dirty.
Notice there are 20,632,867 voter records in California when excluding change of address (CoA) flags, or "movers", and deceased.
There are 20,653,779 when excluding ONLY movers.
There are 23,121,820 when including BOTH deceased & MOVERS.
Do you all understand what I'm showing you in the above tweet, and thread in general?
Do you NOW understand how badly you've been lied to about the potential for mass illegal ballots when sent unsolicited?
Media excuses about "similar names and addresses" are total nonsense.
Again, as I've stated more times than I can count, the reality of the situation re: dirty voter rolls that are easily exploited, is even worse than the numbers suggest.
Why?
The imperfect system lags. You leave state, you do not immediately file CoAs. You die, who notifies SoS?
Especially when potential wrongdoers know verification procedures are a joke — and worse, that corrupt media will cover for them — it takes little-to-no thought for someone to return an unsolicited and illegally cast mail-in ballot.
That's why we never sent unsolicited ballots.
Even before this particular election and before the 2020 election, my inbox has been filled with pictures just like this because I've been vocal about this issue.
It's not just California. They're just the very bad model for it, which other states blindly adopted in 2020.
And frankly, to watch other so-called election "experts" pretend this doesn't happen and it's not problematic to say the least, has been more than mildly nauseating.
They're either poli pretenders or big fat liars. Either way, what it says about their characters doesn't flatter.
Voter lives in Sheridan, Montana, yet received a ballot from Oroville, California. This is not uncommon, nor can we assume all are angels.
To be clear, I'm not telling anyone the system is "rigged" and their vote doesn't matter.
I've seen a lot of stupid political commentary over the years. But what I'm reading about California is in the running for the dumbest.
Larry Elder didn't "lose". He outperformed every major poll that already had him in the lead if "Yes" won.
But "Yes" had to win.
On that...
Newsom survived a recall in a very blue state. When his campaign woke up and realized it was closer than expected, they used their significant monetary advantage and compliant media to scare voters.
And still lose counties he previously won and which voted for Joe Biden.
More..
Republicans have been playing a game of defense in California for many years, and have surrounded Orange County, San Diego/SoCal.
Think Vitor Belfort could've lasted a single round with this Evander Holyfield — or, this Riddick Bowe for that matter?
This is when boxing was still great. Before they needed to reach back to out-of-prime former champs to cover their shallow bench.
If you watched that video — particularly the punishment Evander Holyfield took from Riddick Bowe in Round 1, and survived — then you know there's no chance Vitor Belfort could survive even early rounds with either of those two men.
A realistic electorate is “laughably slanted”, claims Phil Bump at WaPo.
Look at the electorates in 2016 and 2020. Did the real partisan composition “slant” more closely to weights used by @Rasmussen_Poll or his own outfit’s poll?
But this is how actual pollsters know Phil Bump and others like him are total frauds, not experts.
He clearly knows nothing about how weights work.
Weights for party composition wouldn’t impact the actual percentage of Ds the claim @Rasmussen_Poll found agreed with Sen. Graham.
If the weight for party was adjusted, the percentage of Ds @Rasmussen_Poll found would agreed with Graham would stay the same, while the overall “total” nationally, would decline.
1. SCOOP: Biden Admin is not done putting members of U.S. armed services at risk, mandating U.S. Marines receive first dose vaccinations before WTI (Weapons Tactics Instructions) in a week, ignoring apps for exemptions that include religious and history of Myocarditis.
Further..
2. Further, the second dose will be administered during WTI, in a remote location with only field medic attention available to them.
Again, this is ordered for those who have known medical conditions that were considered viable causes for exemptions only a week ago.
These are all people who had no problem getting vaccinated for scores of other diseases.
They were told they would have the ability to obtain waivers and are now facing the choice between risk to personal harm and/or violation of conscience, or professional ruination.
Simply put, when you ask whether they support/oppose "Requiring everyone to carry a 'vaccine passport' before they are allowed to participate in pre-pandemic activities," it's basically even.
But when you ask specifics about requiring vaccines for those activities, it is NOT.
Among the LEAST popular was allowing employers to mandate employees get the vaccine. 38% supported that, while 57.2% opposed it, including 41.3% who "strongly" opposed it.
Workers were SIGNIFICANTLY less likely to support it. Only $200k and postgrads supported the mandate.