1) There’s no point having laws about single-sex spaces because predatory men will just break them anyway. 2) There are laws in place to deal with predatory men who would use self-ID to access women’s spaces.
3) If the penis-haver who exposes their penis to you self-identifies as a woman, you should just look away and not be a bigot. 4) If the penis-haver who exposes their penis to you self-identifies as a woman but has prior convictions, they aren’t really a woman.
5) Men would never go to the trouble of saying ‘I’m a woman’ to get access to women. 6) Any self-identified woman caught committing sex crimes in women’s spaces is actually a predatory man pretending to be trans.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If a Jehovah’s Witness wants to refuse a blood transfusion that would potentially save their life, I find that sad but it has little to do with me.
If a Jehovah’s Witness wants to refuse consent for a child to have a potentially life-saving blood transfusion, medical staff have the option of seeking a court order to over-ride parental objections.
If Jehovah’s Witnesses as an organisation campaigned to have the law changed so that it is illegal for anyone to be given a blood transfusion, this would clash with my rights and I would be vociferously against it.
THREAD:
I’ve really struggled to put into words the impact of the news story on rapists being able to self-ID as women and have their crimes recorded as if they were women. 1/5
For years after a man raped me I struggled to find the words to talk about what happened to me. I can’t imagine the sheer gaslighting of being expected to call him a woman. To have to explain what ‘her’ penis did to me. 2/5
I was a well-educated woman in her 20s. I was rendered practically mute. It’s only in the past year that I’ve been able to write about what happened. There is still only one person who has heard everything that happened in my own voice. 3/5