Tweet

LawBeat

6 Sep, 17 tweets, 12 min read

A Delhi court will today continue to hear the bail application of #UmarKhalid in a case under #UAPA relating to #DelhiRiots

Matter listed before ASJ Amitabh Rawat.

In the previous hearing, Adv Trideep Pais for Khalid told the Delhi Court that the entire charge sheet filed by Delhi Police against Khalid did not read like a charge sheet but the script of “The Family Man” Amazon web series.
lawbeat.in/top-stories/ch…

Hearing begins.

#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots

The court enquires whether anyone is present for the hearing.
#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots

Adv. Pais informs the court that he has filed a substitute application.
He says that he doesn't want to interfere in the original bail application.
#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots

The matter is next to be called at 11:30 for SPP is absent.
#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots

Matter starts.

Adv. Pais has filed a fresh bail application u/s 437 CrPC substituting the earlier one u/s 439 CrPC.
Earlier SPP Amit Prasad has challenged the maintainability of the bail application u/s 439 CrPC of Ishrat Jahan in the same FIR.

#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots

In a related matter, the court inquires Jail authorities how Ishrat Jahan will be produced before the court on 10 September.
Jail Authorities says as the court orders.
Court says it's WebEx then.

#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots

Adv. Pais: I have moved the new application to reflect section 437.
Have Mr. Prasad received the copy of the same?

#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots

SPP Prasad: Yes, I have recieved it. But I need to revert the same.
#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots

Pais: I can continue arguing.
#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots

Pais: My learned friend can let his argument that my application is a dilatory tactic come on record. I can continue with my arguments. SPP's response can come later.
#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots

Court says that it is a question of law that if a new bail application has come on record, SPP's reply needs to be filed before arguments can be made on new application.
#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots

Court: It is a technical issue. I agree with Mr. Pais that the State's reply will be more or less the same. But State's reply needs to be filed.
#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots

Court: I don't want technical objections to come in the way. Let the matter come on tomorrow.
#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots

SPP Prasad: Tomorrow is a physical hearing day. Also, I am facing health issues.
Pais: I have one matter before High Court as well.
#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots

Court: State to file its reply. Also, Mr. Pais to seek instructions from his client whether he wants to be present in court physically.

The matter is listed to be next heard on the day after tomorrow at 11 am.
#UmarKhalid #UAPA #DelhiRiots

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

More from @LawBeatInd

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

14 Sep

@DelhiPolice

Delhi High Court denies bail to two accused persons in #DelhiRiots case of violence against the @DelhiPolice in which HC Ratan Lal lost his life.

Noting that the footage of the two accused persons at the "Scene of Crime is quite egregious," the court said it was "sufficient to keep the Petitioner(s) in custody."

Comparing the cases to those of other accused who were given bail in the matter, the court said the Petitioners "did not satisfy the ingredients to claim bail on ground of parity with the other co-accused...as none of those co-accused...were caught in an overt act..."

Read 9 tweets

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

14 Sep

@NijiSachiv

BREAKING UPDATE: Attorney General grants sanction to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against @NijiSachiv for his YouTube video with allegedly “scurrilous" "vituperative" and "highly derogatory" words against Supreme Court and its judges.

@NijiSachiv

Application by Law Student had stated that video titled ‘Ajeet Bharti Roasts Supreme Court, High Courts’ which was uploaded on @NijiSachiv’s
YouTube channel DO Politics “is not only in bad taste but also clearly crosses the line between constructive criticism and contempt”

@NijiSachiv

Law student had alleged in the application that in the said video @NijiSachiv abused Supreme Court “using extremely crass and obscene language”, “tried to disgrace it on lines of rampant corruption, nepotism, being sold” and “directing protests and riots throughout the country”.

Read 8 tweets

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

14 Sep

@dir_ed

@dir_ed moves Delhi High Court seeking quashing of notices issued to its officers in Delhi on an FIR registered by the Kalighat PS in Kolkata on a complaint by @AITCofficial leader Abhishek Banerjee.

S. 160(1) CrPC notices have been issued to the Enforcement Directorate officers working from the headquarters in Delhi. ED states in its petition that it has been investigating into the illegal coal
mining scam and the role of Abhishek Banerjee in the scam.

@AITCofficial

ED states that the said FIR has been registered with a malafide intention to derail the investigation under PMLA being conducted by it in the illegal coal mining scam.
@AITCofficial

Read 4 tweets

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

14 Sep

[Access to Justice] Preliminary Research into available data in order to determine as to what extent, access to justice has been effected due to pandemic.

Kerala: 14 districts

i. [Kasargod]
Number of orders/ judgments Pre-pandemic: 2069
Number of Order/Judgments Post-pandemic: 913

Source: District Court Website

ii. [Thalassery, Kannur]

Number of Orders/Judgments Pre-pandemic: 5838
Number of Order/Judgments Post-pandemic: 2148

Source: District Court Website

Read 4 tweets

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

14 Sep

#DelhiHighCourt to hear plea of Avantha Group promoter Gautam Thapar against his arrest in a money laundering case in connection with the Yes Bank fraud scam.

#YesBank

Earlier the Court had issued notice to the Enforcement Directorate seeking reply on the plea.

lawbeat.in/top-stories/de…

ASG SV Raju seeks adjournment for two days.

Adv Vijay Aggarwal for Thapar opposes adjournment, he says his client is under illegal custody.

Read 4 tweets

LawBeat

@LawBeatInd

14 Sep

@India_NHRC

NHRC issues notices to Delhi, Rajasthan, Haryana, UP, Union of India and other Authorities asking for reports of farmer protest.
@India_NHRC has said that it has received several complaints with allegations of adverse impact on the industrial units, seriously effecting companies.

“Allegedly, transportation is also adversely impacted, causing the commuters, patients, physically challenged people and senior citizens to suffer due to the heavy congestion on roads” : NHRC

“There are also reports that people have to travel long distances to reach their destinations due to the ongoing farmers' agitation and barricades have been put on the borders.”: NHRC

Read 4 tweets

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!