Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Trinh Profile picture
@Trinhnomics
Sep 6, 2021 • 7 tweets • 3 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
Interesting timing for the ECB as prices already rose rather high & now power prices rising further on higher costs! Rally for gas & coal.

Question: What is Germany #1 source of energy?
It is phasing out nuclear + coal.

Answer: Oil & natural gas. Image
Check this out: Energy consumption in Germany.

Look at solar and wind. Look at how much it increased by? And juxtapose that to the MASSIVE INCREASE OF NATURAL GAS.

It has consumed more natural gas from Russia. That smudge of solar + wind got a lot of press but man it's small. Image
Two things:

When people write about how "green" Germany is, they are not talking about German consumption of energy but SUPPLY. So look at below, that's Germany's production of "green" or <coal & >wind + >solar.

But its CONSUMPTION is more imported fossil fuel - Russian ones!👌🏻 Image
Okay, some people don't like that the renewable part of "consumption" misconstrues the source of energy supply as a lot of domestic electricity produced by wind + solar.

Here it is showing sources of energy supply. Natural gas supply has gone up & they're imported from Russia. Image
If u want to write a good story on energy consumption or supply in Germany then: Consumption has gone down & production of renewables have gone up vs coal & nuclear.

Dig deeper then u see total energy supply of renewable small, even if higher, & natural gas 🇷🇺dependency higher👌🏻 Image
Back to that Bbg story:
a) While renewables have increased in share of total power generation to 41%, natural gas is 17% & coal is still 26% (Lignite + hard coal).
b)If natural gas price goes up = electricity price goes up
Electricity is not #1 source of energy, oil & gas are👈🏻 ImageImage
In other words, the rise of commodity prices, particularly natural gas, is pushing up input costs, including but not limited to electricity prices. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Trinh

Trinh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Trinhnomics

Trinh Profile picture
May 29
Trump tariffs. Where are the powers coming from? Well, he has a menu of tariff options. It's the only tax that the president can incur without congress.

For Reciprocal Tariffs, he used the International Emergency Economics Power Act (IEEPA), which has an advantage of SPEED and SCOPE but disadvantage in FOUNDATION or legality.

Why? Well, he declared that the TRADE DEFICIT is the national emergency.

The US Court of International Trade said that he MISUSED the IEEPA, as in the foundation of the "emergency" is not right.
Trump team knew this. They know the laws. They decided for SCOPE and SPEED. What happens next?

Well, they appeal. And eventually, it will be the Supreme Court that will decide. But the foundation of his "emergency" was always being questioned.

Irrespective, for markets, there was already a Trump put, and a clear one. He himself sees these "reciprocal tariffs" as maximalist positions anyway.
Remember that he has other powers to choose from. Section 232 has a STRONGER FOUNDATION but takes a while. You need consultation and etc so it takes time.

The +25% steel & aluminum tariffs for example is from Trump 1.0 and he's just removing exemptions + raising alum from 10% to 25%.

Auto tariff is new.

There is a few others that are being "consulted".
Read 4 tweets
Trinh Profile picture
May 26
Happy Memorial Day to Americans! And good morning to Asia!

Let's talk about something very topical. Debt. Yes, it has risen. How much debt do we have really? Who owns it? Why is cost of debt an issue?

Can the US solve its debt crisis? Image
This chart is my fav chart. I show stock of debt & then flow of debt (change since 2019 in orange bubble). Debt matters in terms of who owns it, which sector, etc.

Who is the biggest debt of them all? Well, Japan. It is also the biggest creditor to the world (lending money). Japanese debt is unique in that because of weak private sector, the government has been just expanding like crazy because the households and corporates just sit on savings.

Okay, why is this important? Well, those savings traditionally invested in their own debt (used to be very low yielding on the longer end) and also OTHERS' debt, USA + other emerging markets, also Europeans etc.Image
The Japanese sovereign yield curve is interesting not just for Japanese lifers, banks & JGB strategists but also for everyone else.

What has happened? Well, per usual they will run fiscal deficit. Nothing new. But the BOJ also owns like 48% of this debt and wants to reduce, but very hard because lifers etc don't want to buy so much more of this supply.

So what happens? The yield curve steepens. What is a yield curve? Well, you can borrow short-term (overnight) or for a long time (30 to 40 year in Japan) at a set rate. Japan has been running very close to zero rate for a long time.

So debt is not an issue if your servicing costs were close to zero.

But the longer, esp the 40-yr is now 3.5%. Yep!
The shorter end, which is policy rate is 0.5%.

This curve is STEEP!Image
Read 13 tweets
Trinh Profile picture
May 14
Good morning,

US April inflation came over night softer, and that's no surprise really - we knew that energy, food and service costs were going lower. Everyone said, well, what pain for China if April exports were strong, not to the US of course, but to the world (+8.1%)YoY. The same is said about US CPI. It's actually slower to 2.3%YoY despite a very soft USD & tariffs that started since February.

What does that mean? Why did the the US-China both come to the table to stop the embargo of trade?
Can both of these arguments be true? Of course. First, we must talk about these different balance sheets. They are one and the same. But they interact differently.

CPI is a domestic phenomenon. US inequality/lack of affordable housing/high costs of college/healthcare/etc are DOMESTIC IN NATURE. We call it NON-TRADEABLE. Sure, higher steel & timber make building a house more expensive. Higher appliances also make it expensive. But let's be honest here, the biggest costs of the house is the land & next costs is the regulations and the permits and the actual time and capital erecting it.

California/NYC/Seattle where the jobs are all have regulations that make it very expensive to build. And that has been the case during LOW TARIFF REGIME.

So listen, just think if you live anywhere. When you get a paycheck, where does your money go? Well, if you rent or mortgage, then it's HOUSING.

Next, if you live in the US and send your children out of state or private for education, it's not a rounding error on two middle class incomes.

Of course, another essential - FOOD.
Another one is transport - that includes FUEL + Car (and indirect cost is TIME).

Goods, while you know, nice to have, durable goods you buy once and hopefully last you a decade or two, like a washing machine or a fridge or a microwave.

Toys, definitely like you buy according to age and once & don't repeat and prolly can get used because everyone disposes of this once the child is done.Image
So when you look at US inflation, the largest weights aren't GOODS or IMPORTED goods for a consumer.

It may be a very big part of a producer that imports intermediates. Say an oil driller that needs steel to build infra to drill or a domestic producer of appliances that need parts that are cheaper to source, say China.

Irrespective, an AVERAGE American person isn't going to feel tariffs. They will feel it via the news, via tiktok, via social media, via the financial markets that have exposure to the higher costs, but they are not feeling it much if they don't have a lot of financial assets.

So the reality is that inflation in the US is GOING DOWN for core goods. Egg inflation is lower after a flu supply shock. US food exporters will sell more domestically if selling abroad faces tariffs. But food isn't the bulk of inflation.

It's the services like housing etc. And they are going down.
Read 9 tweets
Trinh Profile picture
May 13
Of course - China would say it didn’t care that there was an embargo on Chinese goods by it’s #1 customer but a 1trn surplus country with manufacturing share of GDP key to investment and consumption & indirect sector like services would care.

Why? Factories shut first (impact on China), shortages/empty shelves later (impact on the US & due to front loading much later & most goods are discretionary), & so the pain that China feels from trade war is real while the US is expectations of pain via financial assets movement, which may or may not come.
And the reality is who blinked/caved first doesn’t matter. But anyone who laughed at this & said China can just hunker down & accept massive unemployment of 5 to 8millions is not realizing the importance of jobs, especially manufacturing job.

It anchors the entire economy, including services.
Like people that lose steady paying jobs that pay for pensions etc will not want services like restaurant, movies, haircuts as often, nails, music lessons for kids etc.

Not all services are equal. Services were lost during COVID & never recovered & anyone who has lived in a country with high services & informal jobs know that u cannot steadily gain income on gigs.

U need a steady pay check. At the national level, it is millions & hundreds of millions account compounding to give national savings and investment.
Read 5 tweets
Trinh Profile picture
May 9
UK-US trade-deal and what does it tell you about Asian trade deals?

The UK got 100k auto for 10% vs 232 25% for autos & that's basically 100% of UK auto exports to the US (exported 104k in 2024)

UK got jet engines & plane parts at 0%, which is also a top export

UK got 0% on steel but the UK is on the verge of closing the last steel plant, which is Chinese owned anyway, so no benefit here but maybe it will help beef up some production.

10% on the rest of exports.

Mutual reduction of tariffs on ethanol + beef (agri win for the US but not so much)
For autos, given the 10% tariff but at 100k quota, which is basically all of UK autos, there is no room for "rerouting" of other autos that won't get tariffed. Meaning, the lower tariff from 25% to 10% but with a quota is an interesting move that sets up for EU trade talks on autos.

Steel - UK not a threat so 0% means maybe UK can beef up product but less competitive than the US as the US is almost self-sufficient w/ steel

Agri - US will need to produce beef that UK standard to export. I suppose that can't be hard

Ethanol is at 0% tariff so a win for US agri. For US soybean producers etc, ethanol is a win but how big is it if its biggest export market, China, is shut?
There are talks that the US will slash tariffs on Chinese goods. But let's remind ourselves this:

The US has 20% tariffs on China from Trump 1.0 to Biden (roughly) + 20% of fentanyl tariff on China + reciprocal that was later escalated to 145%.

If the US lowers 145% to say 50%, you still have close to 100% tariffs on China on most goods and higher levels for say autos.

nypost.com/2025/05/08/bus…
Read 5 tweets
Trinh Profile picture
May 8
Okay, I want to talk about tariffs a bit because there are a lot of tariffs. On everyone:

1) Steel + aluminium +25%
2) Autos is 25% (and some auto parts except USMCA qualified) - but note that Trump has realized that steel & alum are INTERMEDIATE GOODS and when you tax that then you got a big problem so he's BACKTRACKING on that for the auto sector, as in, they don't get steel & alum on top of auto
3) 10% on everyone ex China on top of above until early July in Asia.
4) China gets embargo level of tariffs or >100% and some >200%.
5) Exemptions for semiconductor, energy, pharma, ICT (phones, laptops etc), commodities.

How bad is this?
Tariffs are a tax on investment so Trump is PUTTING A TAX ON INVESTMENT ABROAD.

Specifically: steel & alum & auto ex USMCA and specifically China.

More to come of course but this is now.

He is starting to understand that when you tax a lot of stuff, especially sectoral, especially intermediates, you are SHORTENING SUPPLY CHAINS AS THIS COMPOUNDS.

A car is made of thousands of parts. Steel is part of it of course. So he has to make exemptions to make sure things don't kill the auto sector that he is trying to rescue/prop up. But supply chains are complicated.

The US used to be almost tariff free. Low single digit of trade-weighted tariff. That means a lot of PING PONG OF TRADE.

As in you can ship intermediates back and forth and have things assembled etc. SUPPLY CHAINS LENGTHENED.

Tariffs SHORTEN SUPPLY CHAINS.
So this complex supply chains that is stretching across US-Canada-Mexico and Asia (ping-ponged across Asia from Japan to Malaysia/Thailand/China) etc is all going to get shortened.

So that is what tariffs will do. Supply chains will be more REGIONALIZED.

No matter what the negotiations will be - US w/ China for example, or US with other Asians or Europeans, the fact is that Trump tariffs are starting at MAXIMALIST positions and will settle at a MORE REASONABLE POSITION BUT STILL VERY HIGH TARIFF REGIME VS BEFORE.

And they will be very TARGETED to shorten supply chains to favor US/Canada/Mexico & maybe key allies in Asia and key allies in Europe.

US trade will China will ultimately be to serve rest of the world or to feed into the above. It will ultimately be cutoff. Because China and the US are strategically decoupling. They are putting a floor on that speed but the speed is towards decoupling.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(