This is relevant but I'd distinguish between nations & individuals. I agree with de Gaulle not because France was unique but because nations can't be "friends". Too much personification. Allies is the best they can hope for. Thinking through individuals...
Analogously, I think of fans as allies. People who listen to my podcast, subscribe on Patreon, read my articles, share, comment, review - are allies in my mission to grow my voice. Few are friends. I don't hold that against friends - or expect to plan a vacation w/my patrons.
Another consideration: the weakness of modern friendships. Few are rooted in necessity or survival. Weak bonds don't lend themselves to allyship, jeopardizing a job or reputation for a glorified acquaintance. I suspect the friend/ally overlap is shrinking.
This is why I've come to realize the importance of having - and investing in - family. It's the last bastion of strong bonds available in our society. Family will be our last - and only - reliable allies.
I lived in NYC on 9/11. My mom worked at WTC & was rescued by a guy who pulled her into a subway station as the first tower was collapsing. She was missing for 10 hours. We feared the worst. Cell towers were down. She trekked through subway tunnels to Brooklyn.
🍡
The heaviest relief came when we finally reconnected. It never came for so many.
As the smouldering stench that permeated the city for months subsided, so did their hopes.
You'll hear plenty of platitudes today. But I try to take one lesson from that experience each year...
This year, that lesson is "freedom", but not in the way you think...
The same people who created the Taliban & Al Qaeda manipulated an emotional nation into a preposterous idea: imposing our definition of freedom on others - with war.
Bloomberg did this. His first win was as a Republican, then Democrat, then Independent. Some of his people are working w/Andrew Yang, so it's not inconceivable.
I'd say this shuts the door to a future in the Democratic party, but so does being an outsider or becoming NYC mayor.
Ever wonder how strange it is that most music that shapes our lives was written by 20-somethings?
An age that's decades before creatives truly develop a distinctive voice & depth of experience.
So why is this the case?
A hypothesis in 4 parts...
4 reasons most impactful music is created by 20-somethings
1) Selection 2) Genius 3) Universality 4) Consumption age
1) Selection: the arts are brutal careers, esp. music. Odds of success, tiny. If you don't make it by your late 20's, you age out of young fans who control cool.
2) Genius: The people who do succeed are likely to be standouts, if not geniuses. If not as songwriters, then performers or determined success-seekers. They have an unstoppable quality that will break through quickly.
Yes it's true, most technologies plateau. We've seen that w/smartphones, computers, apps & all consumer tech.
Similarly, entire industries plateau & consolidate. How often do you think about your electricity or water supplier?
These become platforms on which others build.
2/9
Innovators move on to surrounding challenges. Take water for example. They figure out better filtration methods, taste for drinking, ways to economize for showers, flushing or lawn care.
But looking at water supply companies won't give you that data.
3/9
Whatever you think of the urgency of climate change, the best solutions, or effectiveness of this specific move (⬇️ beef), this move is the product of powerful climate narratives manifested in the real world by adherents (Epicurious employees/mgmt).
This is just the start.
2/5
I suspect it's just a matter of time before Google adjusts its algorithms to make finding beef recipes as hard as they did to find funny photos of portly people (to make fun of myself).