~ Kesa-vinyasa: Hairstyles (coiffures) in early Indian arts
The scriptures/mural representations, ranging from the 2nd-century BC to the 17th century AD, have detailed out the everyday living of Indians. This literary data has immense value in analyzing the culture.
The Harappans were quite interested in unique hairstyles and using combs and mirrors for making their hair-do. The picture here shows a Mirror, hairpin & collyrium pot, dated 2700 BC.
The dancing girl of the Harappan period is one of the finest examples of Indian art. An exclusive feature of this sculpture is her hair, coiled beautifully in a thick mass falling over the right shoulder.
The statue of ‘Priest King’ of Mohenjodaro has a trimmed beard and hair parted in the middle tied with a fillet on the forehead.
Kautilya’s Arthashastra mentions two styles of hairdressing by women that were prevalent in society.
Pic: One of the Yakshini from the Mauryan period.
Her neatly combed hair is seen tied beautifully forming a loop at the back.
The sculpture of Salabhanjika from Sanchi shown here has an elaborate hair arrangement, tied in a top fan-shaped bun in the front and open hair at the back.
The women in the Bharhut sculptures arranged their hair in various styles. This panel, namely worshipping of Bodhi tree, shows women with neatly tied hair with a loose knot at the back. Hairs were elaborately done in those days.
~ The Mauryan sculptures found in various parts of India give details about the hairstyle/coiffures of those periods. Hairstyles for men were as important as for women.
The work of Panini also throws light on the subject of hairstyles. The accounts of Megasthenese and Arrian have details about the coiffures. Hala’s Gatha Saptasati presents an account of the hairstyles known to the Satavahana period.
Pic: Woman depicted in the Khajuraho temples
Bharata’s Natyasastra describes a variety of hairstyles that enables us to know the hairstyles of the Ikshvaku period. Besides, the Divyavadana, Vatsyayana, and the Mahobhoshya have details about various hairstyles for both men and women. Look at Parvati's hairs in the second pic
For the Gupta period, all the important works of Kalidasa have mentions of elaborated hairstyles. Similarly, the Vayu Purana, the Amarkosa, the Vishnu Dharmottara Purana, Varahamihir's Brhat Samita, and the Harshacharita give ample information in this regard.
And finally, two of my favorite pics;
1) Lady with a long braid, Tamil Nadu (Vijayanagara period)
2) Rani ki vav, Patan (Gujarat), Solanki period
Sources:
(i) Hairstyles in Ancient Indian Art by K. Krishna Murthy
The same pipeline/network effect can now be seen in the education sector. So many of them with the one-year-long degree from Harvard are now in the business of 'revolutionizing' education, neatly aligned with agendas of the world bank/IMF/Impact bonds.
A typical trajectory for such organizations/start-ups is to avail initial funding from the impact fund instituted at the graduating institution. Get recognition for your 'revolutionizing' work from the same network and get invited to a symposium organized by the same cabal.
What drives these organizations is not what structural problems education sector is facing, but what can attract funding and instant recognition. Hence, playing around with popular educational discourse, by using terms like 'at scale', 'evidence-based', 'theory of change' , etc.
Reading this fascinating account on Shyamji Krishnavarma's life & work. A graduate of Balliol College, he founded the IHRS, India House, and The Indian Sociologist in London.
He believed in Spencer's dictum: "Resistance to aggression is not simply justified, but imperative".
Krishnavarma founded India House as a hostel for Indian students to help Indian students who were facing racist attacks in Britain. It was inaugurated in presence of Dadabhai Naoroji, Lala Lajpat Rai, Madam Cama, etc.
Despite Krishnavarma being one of the first activists to organize militant anticolonial resistance outside India, his name does not figure among the celebrities of the official versions of the Indian independence struggle. His scholarly contributions have been forgotten, too.
Re-reading enlightenment thoughts from a decolonial perspective makes one aware of how enlightenment thinkers were complicit in justifying imperialism on the grounds that there were fundamental philosophical distinctions that separated properly human from not-so-properly ones.
Engaging with the philosophical & anthropological writings of Immanuel Kant from a decolonial lens, one can see how his ideas were grounded in the logic of colonial difference, and how his theory of universal reason was applicable to only those who he defined as proper humans.
Kant is famous for arguing that it was not God that gives us our humanity but the faculty of reason itself. For him, the reason was “architectonic” that enabled the freedom of each individual’s will to co-exist with the freedom of everyone else in accordance with universal law.
That's how it is, they take Telugu lightly
In all those English schools.
~ Chellapilla Venkata Sastry
When all of his contemporaries were quoting Shelley, Keats, and Eliot, Vishwanadha Satyanarayana garu spoke of Indian aesthetics of rasa, aucitya, vakrokti and dhvani and quoted from Abhinvagupta, Mammata, etc., in defiance of every modern literary convention.
Sanjay Subramanyam describes how by the turn of the 20th century, the life of a Telugu teacher became miserable. "His general image was of a fossilized, unimaginative individual who somehow had instant access to old books, but lacked the intelligence to study any modern subject."
The leaders of HSRA circulated a manifesto at the Lahore Congress session in December 1929. The manifesto contained blistering attacks against the 'compromising policy' of Gandhi and the Congress leadership.
"Mahatma Gandhi is great and we mean no disrespect to him if we express our emphatic disapproval of the methods advocated by him for our country's emancipation. To us, the Mahatma is an impossible visionary."
"Non-violence may be a noble ideal, but it is a thing of the morrow. We can be situated as we are, never hope to win freedom by mere non-violence.
All talk of peace may be sincere, but we, of the slave nation, cannot, and must not, be led away by such false ideology."
The Marxist historians in the history writing projects (as a statist exercise) ensured that work by historians like Radha Kumud Mookerji was either delegitimized (by labeling them as nationalists) or their memory completely obliterated (by dropping their work from the syllabus).
As a historian of Ancient India, Radha Kumud Mookerji started his career by joining the newly established National Council of Education, while teaching at the Bengal National College. After 1915, he embarked on a series of tenures at universities in Benares, Mysore, and Lucknow.
His work not only received unequivocal praise from his academic fraternity, for being so detailed despite the vastness of the subject but was also equally popular among students who were then studying in the central/state government-run universities.