Is there anyone else as *appalled* and concerned as I am about this order of the Karnataka HC? Seems to miss the point completely about this being a completely bogus and ecologically inappropriate approach to river conservation or tree planting! 1/n livelaw.in/news-updates/k…
Not to mention the hypocrisy involved in so-called environmental conservation efforts by an entity that is itself suspect in its actions and damage to the environment including rivers! @NityJayaraman writes: thewire.in/environment/is… 3/n
If the figures quoted in @LiveLawIndia article are correct, 2530000000 trees are to be planted along 639 km of river=1278 sq km or 127800 ha area. That's a ridiculously high density ~20,000 trees/ha! No ecosystem on earth has such densities. Total scam or ecological disaster! 4/n
I've written about how such tree planting can cause more harm than good. Many involve celebrities--in the present case a person (so-called 'god-man') literally capitalising on ecological ignorance to hoodwink a genuinely concerned public. n/n thehindu.com/sci-tech/energ…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thanks to everyone who shared my article. Seems like it was read widely. Here is a thread on some of the resources/materials I referred to and which provide more context esp. on tree planting/afforestation in India. Plus a few comments I received... thread... 1/n
Much research + scientists have pointed out why planting trees in non-forest ecosystems such as grasslands and savannas is a bad idea. Here's a great paper
Savannahs of Asia: antiquity, biogeography, and an uncertain future by Jayashree Ratnam et al doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2… 3/n