Share this page!

LawBeat Profile picture
Twitter logo
8 Sep, 5 tweets, 3 min read
The Punjab & Haryana High Court recently observed that, if two adult people are in a live-in relationship with each other, even though they are already married to someone else, would be no offence.

#liveinrelationships
#nooffence Image
"I find myself unable to agree with that,especially in view of the fact that the Supreme Court in Joseph Shine v.Union of India has struck down Section 497 of the IPC as being has been unconstitutional," noted Justice Amol Rattan Singh

#LiveIn
#adultery
The Bench was hearing a protection plea filed by a live-in couple seeking a direction upon the official respondents, not to harass them.

#LiveIn
The Bench disagreed with Allahabad HC's Social Fabric ruling in which the High Court had observed that live-in-relationship can't be at the cost of the social fabric of this Country. Image
Read Story:

“Unable to agree with view that Live-in relationships destroy social fabric”: Punjab & Haryana High Court

@whattalawyer reports
lawbeat.in/news-updates/u…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with LawBeat

LawBeat Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LawBeatInd

LawBeat Profile picture
14 Sep
Delhi High Court denies bail to two accused persons in #DelhiRiots case of violence against the @DelhiPolice in which HC Ratan Lal lost his life.
Noting that the footage of the two accused persons at the "Scene of Crime is quite egregious," the court said it was "sufficient to keep the Petitioner(s) in custody."
Comparing the cases to those of other accused who were given bail in the matter, the court said the Petitioners "did not satisfy the ingredients to claim bail on ground of parity with the other co-accused...as none of those co-accused...were caught in an overt act..."
Read 9 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
14 Sep
BREAKING UPDATE: Attorney General grants sanction to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against @NijiSachiv for his YouTube video with allegedly “scurrilous" "vituperative" and "highly derogatory" words against Supreme Court and its judges.
Application by Law Student had stated that video titled ‘Ajeet Bharti Roasts Supreme Court, High Courts’ which was uploaded on @NijiSachiv’s
YouTube channel DO Politics “is not only in bad taste but also clearly crosses the line between constructive criticism and contempt”
Law student had alleged in the application that in the said video @NijiSachiv abused Supreme Court “using extremely crass and obscene language”, “tried to disgrace it on lines of rampant corruption, nepotism, being sold” and “directing protests and riots throughout the country”.
Read 8 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
14 Sep
@dir_ed moves Delhi High Court seeking quashing of notices issued to its officers in Delhi on an FIR registered by the Kalighat PS in Kolkata on a complaint by @AITCofficial leader Abhishek Banerjee.
S. 160(1) CrPC notices have been issued to the Enforcement Directorate officers working from the headquarters in Delhi. ED states in its petition that it has been investigating into the illegal coal
mining scam and the role of Abhishek Banerjee in the scam.
ED states that the said FIR has been registered with a malafide intention to derail the investigation under PMLA being conducted by it in the illegal coal mining scam.
@AITCofficial
Read 4 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
14 Sep
[Access to Justice] Preliminary Research into available data in order to determine as to what extent, access to justice has been effected due to pandemic.
Kerala: 14 districts

i. [Kasargod]
Number of orders/ judgments Pre-pandemic: 2069
Number of Order/Judgments Post-pandemic: 913

Source: District Court Website
ii. [Thalassery, Kannur]

Number of Orders/Judgments Pre-pandemic: 5838
Number of Order/Judgments Post-pandemic: 2148

Source: District Court Website
Read 4 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
14 Sep
#DelhiHighCourt to hear plea of Avantha Group promoter Gautam Thapar against his arrest in a money laundering case in connection with the Yes Bank fraud scam.

#YesBank
Earlier the Court had issued notice to the Enforcement Directorate seeking reply on the plea.

lawbeat.in/top-stories/de…
ASG SV Raju seeks adjournment for two days.

Adv Vijay Aggarwal for Thapar opposes adjournment, he says his client is under illegal custody.
Read 4 tweets
LawBeat Profile picture
14 Sep
NHRC issues notices to Delhi, Rajasthan, Haryana, UP, Union of India and other Authorities asking for reports of farmer protest.
@India_NHRC has said that it has received several complaints with allegations of adverse impact on the industrial units, seriously effecting companies.
“Allegedly, transportation is also adversely impacted, causing the commuters, patients, physically challenged people and senior citizens to suffer due to the heavy congestion on roads” : NHRC
“There are also reports that people have to travel long distances to reach their destinations due to the ongoing farmers' agitation and barricades have been put on the borders.”: NHRC
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @LawBeatInd has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @LawBeatInd!

Read all threads by @LawBeatInd

:(