Adv. Singh argues that the State's objection to the maintainability of the bail plea under section 439, Cr.P.C. is wrong preposition. #DelhiRiots#delhicourt
Singh continues reading relevant legal provisions and earlier judgments to prove his contention good that only High Court in original jurisdiction can be excluded to hear bail plea under section 439 Cr.P.C. not Special Court. #DelhiRiots#delhicourt
To strengthen his contention that when a Special Court will entertain a bail application under UAPA, it will not be under sec. 437 CrP.C. Singh reads relevant provisions of NI Act.
Singh adds that the provisions of the NIA Act show that a special court constituted under the said Act is to be presided over by a person who, immediately before his appointment was a Sessions Judge or an Additional Sessions Judge. #DelhiRiots#delhicourt
Singh avers that the question is as a Special Court under which provision are you going to exercise Jurisdiction? sec. 437 CrPC or sec. 439 CrPC? #Delhicourt#DelhiRiots
He avers if there is any ambiguity regarding the maintainability under section 439 CrPC and a change is made to apply it under section 437 CrPC, still, it doesn't make any changes to the substance of the plea. #delhicourt#DelhiRiots
Following Singh's arguments, Court says that the State has raised the same objections in a related bail hearing too and the bail plea was withdrawn. #DelhiRiots
Court says that it is the first time I am hearing such objections being raised against a bail plea. #delhicourt
Court asks Singh to stop today as Court has a leave post-lunch session.
The hearing adjourned till September 21 for virtual hearing. #DelhiRiots
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Delhi High Court denies bail to two accused persons in #DelhiRiots case of violence against the @DelhiPolice in which HC Ratan Lal lost his life.
Noting that the footage of the two accused persons at the "Scene of Crime is quite egregious," the court said it was "sufficient to keep the Petitioner(s) in custody."
Comparing the cases to those of other accused who were given bail in the matter, the court said the Petitioners "did not satisfy the ingredients to claim bail on ground of parity with the other co-accused...as none of those co-accused...were caught in an overt act..."
BREAKING UPDATE: Attorney General grants sanction to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against @NijiSachiv for his YouTube video with allegedly “scurrilous" "vituperative" and "highly derogatory" words against Supreme Court and its judges.
Application by Law Student had stated that video titled ‘Ajeet Bharti Roasts Supreme Court, High Courts’ which was uploaded on @NijiSachiv’s
YouTube channel DO Politics “is not only in bad taste but also clearly crosses the line between constructive criticism and contempt”
Law student had alleged in the application that in the said video @NijiSachiv abused Supreme Court “using extremely crass and obscene language”, “tried to disgrace it on lines of rampant corruption, nepotism, being sold” and “directing protests and riots throughout the country”.
@dir_ed moves Delhi High Court seeking quashing of notices issued to its officers in Delhi on an FIR registered by the Kalighat PS in Kolkata on a complaint by @AITCofficial leader Abhishek Banerjee.
S. 160(1) CrPC notices have been issued to the Enforcement Directorate officers working from the headquarters in Delhi. ED states in its petition that it has been investigating into the illegal coal
mining scam and the role of Abhishek Banerjee in the scam.
ED states that the said FIR has been registered with a malafide intention to derail the investigation under PMLA being conducted by it in the illegal coal mining scam. @AITCofficial
[Access to Justice] Preliminary Research into available data in order to determine as to what extent, access to justice has been effected due to pandemic.
Kerala: 14 districts
i. [Kasargod]
Number of orders/ judgments Pre-pandemic: 2069
Number of Order/Judgments Post-pandemic: 913
Source: District Court Website
ii. [Thalassery, Kannur]
Number of Orders/Judgments Pre-pandemic: 5838
Number of Order/Judgments Post-pandemic: 2148
#DelhiHighCourt to hear plea of Avantha Group promoter Gautam Thapar against his arrest in a money laundering case in connection with the Yes Bank fraud scam.
NHRC issues notices to Delhi, Rajasthan, Haryana, UP, Union of India and other Authorities asking for reports of farmer protest. @India_NHRC has said that it has received several complaints with allegations of adverse impact on the industrial units, seriously effecting companies.
“Allegedly, transportation is also adversely impacted, causing the commuters, patients, physically challenged people and senior citizens to suffer due to the heavy congestion on roads” : NHRC
“There are also reports that people have to travel long distances to reach their destinations due to the ongoing farmers' agitation and barricades have been put on the borders.”: NHRC