On lunch break at the LaceyLarkin trial. Attorney Bruce Feder, who represents one of Lacey and Larkin‘s codefendants, followed up before lunch on some of what Beinert said in his opening. #Backpage #FirstAmendment 1/
He explained content moderation to the jury and told them that in addition to an illegal/legal standard of assessing ads on Backpage, moderators tried to keep content to a “Playboy” standard, though legally they did not have to do any content moderation at all. 2/
He also described some of the prosecution’s deceptive tactics in its September 3 opening statement, such as putting the mug shots of the defendants on projected slides next to emails and statements they did not make. 3/
And the prosecution often took out of context or intentionally interpreted certain statements as improper when in reality they were not 4/
Feder Pointed out that aggregation, which the government described as terrible, was a legal practice. And that most of the adult ads that were aggregated on Backpage back in the day came from from Google and craigslist 5/
Feder explained there was nothing illegal about using social influencers to refer potential clients. Ditto Links to TER, the erotic review. Eventually Backpage stopped links from TER, tho not obliged to. 6/
As for the court cases that Beinert referred to at length in his opening, Feder observed that the federal government did not intervene in any of those cases but that they could have. 7/
Interestingly, in the morning before the jury came in an attorney for Larkin, Whitney Bernstein, brought up the DOJ memos from 2012 and 2013 which argue against prosecuting Backpage because of Backpage’s extensive cooperation with law-enforcement 8/
Bernstein argued that certain facts in the memos were exculpatory and should come in to the trial. Currently those memos have been excluded on a technicality. Though they have been referred to by @WIRED and published by @reason 9/
Judge Brnovich said that those memos will be discussed at another time. Another issue that came up before the jury came in involved an alleged statement supposedly made by Michael Lacey outside a US Senate hearing in 2017. 10/
As I mentioned in a previous string this morning, Brnovich seemed troubled that the prosecution’s representation of what the witness to the statement said did not match the FBI’s interview of the woman, the mom of daughter who was advertised on Backpage 11/
The FBI report said that when Lacey came out of the Senate hearing he was mobbed by a scrum of reporters. At which he supposedly made a statement about “yahoos.” 12/
I imagine though I don’t know for certain that if Lacey made any such a statement he was probably referring to the politicians who had been questioning him previously. 13/
Prosecutors say this statement was directed at the mom though the FBI report doesnt say this. The prosecutors assured the judge that this mom would say something different on the stand. Wonder if @ENBrown remembers anything from that morning in Jan 2017. We both were there. 14/
BTW, please see Elizabeth’s awesome new article on the start of the trial. 15/ reason.com/2021/09/08/bac…
Another big point that Bienert made in his opening was about the prosecutions allegation that what Lacey and Larkin had done in defending Backpage was all because of greed 16/
but Lacey and Larkin had already made a lot of money from their newspapers prior to the creation of Backpage in 2004. They didn’t need the money. But they refused to bow to government demands that they silence first amendment protected speech 17/
Lacey and Larkin have gone to jail more than once defending freedom of speech. Most notably in the case of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, when they were illegally arrested for publishing an article about an improper grand jury. On the first amendment front they have nothing to prove. 18/
Lunch break is almost over now so I’m gonna go head back into the sauna that is the special proceedings court room in the Sandra Day O’Connor federal courthouse. Will give you a report at the next break. 19/19

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Lemons

Stephen Lemons Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stephenlemons

11 Sep
Court out in the Lacey Larkin Trial just a few minutes ago. After the Young woman left the stand her mother took the stand. And basically just discussed her activism trying to get a law in Washington state passed to require in person ID for any adult online activity 1/
That law, which was passed, actually was found to be unconstitutional and was overturned. Under questioning the mom had to admit that the law would’ve applied to a lot of different websites including google Twitter etc. any website they might have adult content on it 2/
In other words it was a dangerous law. And you know why it was overturned? Because Backpage challenged it. The mom was also asked about this supposed quote from Lacey where she says he looked at her and referred to her and the people she was with as yahoos. 3/
Read 23 tweets
10 Sep
On a break at the Lacey Larkin Trial. Attorney for Jim Larkin, Whitney Bernstein, did a very effective cross examination of the woman who said that she was trafficked and that ads of her appeared on #Backpage, posted either by herself or by her trafficker. 1/
This was during a time where she had run away from home during several months in 2010. Bernstein established that the witness, A tall thin woman with long red hair in a black pantsuit, had never met or communicated with any of the defendants. 2/
I am not using her Name here because she was trafficked and the persons who trafficked her are in prison, save for a female trafficker who has never been found. 3/
Read 11 tweets
10 Sep
LaceyLarkin and Trial just broke for lunch after the tearful testimony of a young woman who was trafficked out in early age she had three pimps during a time where she had run away from home twice 1/
I’m not going to use the woman’s name because she obviously was victimized by somebody when she was age 15 and 16. My caveat would be that she was not victimized by Michael Lacey or Jim Larkin or any of their four codefendants 2/
Attorneys for the defense fought to keep this testimony out, because it does not relate to any of the underlying 50 ads in the indictment 3/
Read 14 tweets
10 Sep
On a brief break from court at the Lacey and Larkin Trial. Most of this morning has been taken up with the cop from California who basically is reading from what he says are old ads that appeared on #Backpage 1/
The cop explained how he posted an ad for a nonexistent sex worker in The Sacramento Section of Backpage under escorts. And he also posted an ad for a green couch under the furniture section of the Sacramento Backpage 2/
Guess which one got more responses? Drumroll please. The escort. No surprise there. He said he only got one call on the couch. Granted the couch didn’t look like very much. 3/
Read 9 tweets
10 Sep
Back to federal court in Phoenix for the #LaceyLarkinTrial. Scuttlebut is codefendant who was feeling unwell yesterday did not test positive 4 Covid, but court has yet to verify this. ICYMI, please watch @morganloewcbs5's recent piece on #Backpage 1/
In it, Loew explains that the federal government admitted Backpage's takedown in 2018 hurt its ability to find and rescue endangered women and minors. Backpage was a goldmine of info for the FBI and other LEAs & responded to subpoenas w/in 24 hrs. Less if need be.2/
Adult-oriented ads have since migrated overseas to platforms that do not recognize U.S. subpoenas or feel any need to cooperate with U.S. LEAs. As are result, women and marginal communities are less safe. 3/
Read 6 tweets
9 Sep
Court in the #LaceyLarkinTrial recessed 20 minutes ago. In the Last hour, after the jury had been dismissed for the day, a fight broke out between the prosecution and the defense with defense lawyer Whitney Bernstein who represents Jim Larkin bringing up the infamous DOJ memos 1/
These are DOJ memos from 2012 & 2013 which argued #Backpage should not be prosecuted in large part because Backpage was helpful to law-enforcement the in tracking down trafficked victims. The memos also discussed difficulty of determining the age of a female depicted in the ads2/
These memos are out in the public.@WIRED magazine first mentioned them in a 2019 article, and @ENBrown of @reason published the entirety of the memos shortly thereafter. 3/
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(