Hindutva is formed by adding -tva suffix (Pratyay) to Hindu. Now, what do we understand by -tva? In plain language adding -tva (ness) to a noun means :in state of being that noun. Eg. Naritva, Astitva, Prabhutva. Therefore, on the
basis of grammer, Hindutva is simply state of being Hindu.
The terminology initially coined by Babu Chandra Nath in his Hindutva--Hindur Prakrita Itihas attempts through Upanishads and coining the term Hindutva the exposition and eventual
integration of the deepest and abstrutest doctrines of 'Hinduism' where Hindus are notorious for having extremely diverse transcendental doctrines and make a comparative study with foreign belief systems primarily Xnity in the wake of forced
English Education and Anglicization of the masses. So what we observe that the need to integrate extremely diverse belief systems of Bharat Civilization arose as a response to Abrahamic extremism onslaught.
The follow up and popularization of the word was done through Savarkar who too defined Hindutva as a state of being Hindu or closest English translation as Hinduness. In his book he further goes on to propound and attempts to draw from History what
Hindu would mean, how it's more than a mere geogrophical identity and what the state of being Hindu would imply. This too seems to be along the same lines of his predecessor who too in the light such huge diversity that Bhartiya Civilization allows
with respect to ontological enquiry systems attempted to draw the underlying unifying aspect that binds the Civilizational entity. His discussion revolves around the idea of Sindhu Civilizational and cultural identity along with its practices,
practices of the people of India.
In the USA of the mid 19th century, the phrase "the isms" was used as a collective derogatory term to lump together the radical social reform movements of the day (such as slavery abolitionism, feminism,
alcohol prohibitionism, Fourierism, pacifism, early socialism, etc).
Savarkar explains Hinduism as only a fraction or a part of Hindutva and explains it similarly as collective religion or religions of the people of the Sindhu land but further
states that the conflict with understanding who is a Hindu and what is Hinduism creates a friction not needed by us, even questions the use of Hinduism altogether. The discussion he claims is insufficient and outside our scope of enquiry.
Now it is also essential to bring in the views of Shree Aurobindo who also around the time established the Civilizational identity and a unified National identity based on that. In his famous Uttarpara speech laid the ideological foundation for
Hindutva, the Hindu nationalism, in which Maharshi Aurobindo emphatically said, "I say no longer that nationalism is a creed, a religion, a faith; I say that it is the Sanatan Dharma which for us is nationalism. This Hindu nation was born with
the Sanatan Dharma, with it, it moves and with it, it grows." Here the Civilizational identity is bound to Santan Dharma which much better explains the beliefs and practices, of society of way of life of the Bhartiya Civilization than the word
Hinduism which was intended as a derogatory explanation.
Even the Supreme Court in a judgement of 1995 on Hindutva has held that, "it's he way of life of the Indian people and the Indian culture or ethos", and by no means an anti minority or
anti Muslim potion. "Ordinarily, Hindutva is understood as a way of life or a state of mind and is not to be equated with or understood as religious Hindu fundamentalism... it is a fallacy and an error of law to proceed on the assumption... that the
allows so much diversity and freedom in 'Hinduism' rather Santan Dharma.
The charges against Hindutva of Anti-minority, extremist, majoritarian nation are artificial and constructed to serve vested interests of Abrahamic belief systems to exercise
their exclusivist nature whilst keeping Hinduism like a lamb and being devoured slowly along with its cultural practices. The discussion on Hindutva has shown that such attempts were being made to extrapolate and articulate the underlying unity that
covers the numerous belief systems within Bhartiya Civilization. It is of utmost importance that the core problem be addressed that is the Fundamentalist and exclusivist nature of the Abrahamic faiths. Abrahamic extremism is sprinkled throughout
history, it's there in the texts for anybody to read, of how the Europeans and the Middle-eastern pagan practices and believes were brutally destroyed by these ideologies in consonance with what's mentioned in their holy books. Ofcourse I am vary of
the faith that preaches 'only my faith is true and before redemption (Judgment Day or Kayamat), the whole world would be of my belief' and lays down personal mandate to achieve the same and would stop at nothing to exterminate all others and history
is ample proof of the same. The current geo-political reality is due to that. The charge of Hindutva extremism is just a red herring to deflect attempts to fight back against such exclusivist ideas.
[THREAD] ends.
n/n
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today Indians are openly called Racists. This is one amongst many false or exaggerated Narratives that has been built against Indians, especially Hindus.
A [THREAD] to tackle this claim and verify its veracity on Factual Grounds.
A famous example I've been told by many is
of Dwayne Bravo being referred to as 'Kalua' which he initially thought meant powerful. Similarly with Darren Sammy.
Here is an Article: google.com/amp/s/theprint…
(Interesting that in this Article the monkey gate incident has been included where it was verified by none
2/n
other than Sachin that what Bhajji actually said was 'Maa ki' and not Monkey - Alas! Propaganda always wins.)
Let's jump straight into it then.
The root word under contention is Racist. So let's understand this word first. The earliest mentions of Racism is found in
3/n
Kashmir which is often referred as heaven on earth has become a breeding ground for antithetical because of belief of a certain radical cult which wishes to dominate everything.
#KashyapKaKashmir
The true history has been lost and our memories fail to recall how deeply ingrained Kashmir is in Santan samskriti.
The violent exodus of the last remenants of Santan culture happened no so far ago.
#KashyapKaKashmir
Today on Margashirsha, Krishna paksha Pratipada, kashmir was founded by Mahrshi Kashyap. We recall and honour our great Ancestors and recall the spiritual backbone of our Samskriti, our temples and what state has they been reduced to.
@raghurajs_hegde [THREAD]
I have had discussion with an Allopathy supremacist before, which is based on western supremacism which derives validity from Christian supremacism. (Refer Shree C K Raju Ji's work on this, particularly: "Is science Western in origin?")
Point wise refutation to 1/n
@raghurajs_hegde your claim. The earlier discussion was more detailed, parts of it refutes your claims:
Is Ayurveda science:
It's only empirical data which carries any credibility because only through empirical data can it be positively asserted that something works or doesn't. Let us put it /2
@raghurajs_hegde to objective approach of scientific study. The scientific study postulates a hypothesis but only after it gains buttress of empirical data (The research conducted), can the Hypothesis establish to be a Theory as proved or disproved, subject to constant verification of it not /3
@rshiroli @KushalJoka @zenji_nio@toamitesh@RajivMessage First, about creator god. In Hinduism, both smapraday, Jainism and Yoga also don't address creator god, so it's not unique to Buddhism. As to anatman: The idea of unchanging self does not imply no self. If an affirmative answer to the question self is given it would posit the 1/n
@rshiroli@KushalJoka@zenji_nio@toamitesh@RajivMessage question of attributes of self which are certainly not the self and hence without realising the self it is impossible to answer the question of self. To do so the technique is what Shree Guri swami Vivekananda describes as neti - 'not this, not this'. This concept is already 2/n
@rshiroli @KushalJoka @zenji_nio@toamitesh@RajivMessage mentioned in the 7th mantra of the Mandukya Upanishad. So this characteristic of Buddha to teach through negation, for the answer to questions beyond maya exist outside maya itself and hence at first realisation of the self outside maya must be made which was achieved through 3/n
[THREAD] Since it has been going around, how much knowledge is stolen from India, here is more. Europeans credit their knowledge to Greeks and their own individual brilliance. So in this respect let's tackle Greeks.
Indian Developments: Biology and Medicine, Sushruta Samhita /1
Charaka Samhita(Agnivesha tantra)
Botany: Vrikshayurveda by Parasara
Linguistics: Ashtadhyayi by Panini(grammar), Nirukta by Yaksa(etymology), Shiksha by Gargeya(phonetics) Chandashastra by Pingala(prosody)