Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act is a special act & local law. Therefore, the powers u/s 451, 452 & 457 of CrPC (relating to custody & disposal of property) being general provisions are not invocable in respect of proceedings under the Act, observed #AllahabadHC
In the present case an F.I.R. (21.9.20) was registered where the vehicle stated to be carrying the animals was seized, in Ballia UP and proceedings were initiated.
Subsequently,Magistrate upon taking into
consideration the scheme of the Act, refused to release the vehicle
The counsel for the applicant contended in the HC that ,since the vehicle had
been confiscated, the courts below have committed an error in
rejecting the application for release, ignoring the powers
exercisable us 451 and 457 of the Code.
AGA
, to the contrary stated that the
proceedings have been initiated under the PCSA, which is a
Special Act, and provides a separate procedure with regard to
confiscation and seizure under s 5-A.
The PCSA is an Act to prevent the slaughter of cow and
its progeny in the State of UP. Sec 5-A of the Act
which is with regard to regulation on transport of cow, etc., and
is relevant for the purposes of the controversy involved in the
present case : #AllahabadHC
“Sec 5-A sub sec (11) would go to show that the scheme
of the Act provides a complete procedure with regard to
proceedings relating to confiscation and release,” noted Bench.
Bench further relied on sec 5 of CrPC ( saving clause) and as per
terms “thereof nothing contained in the Code shall, in the
absence of a specific provision to the contrary, affect any
special or local law for the time being in force...”
The normal rule of
interpretation that the special provision must prevail over the
general and if a case is covered by a special provision, the
general provision would not be attracted, would be applicable : #AllahabadHC
The vehicle in question having been confiscated
& seized in exercise of powers us 5-A of the
PCSA, which a special Act & a local law
us 5 of the Code, would clearly have the
effect of denuding the Magistrate of his power to pass any order under provisions of Crpc: Bench
Thus, the application u/s 482 of Crpc to release the vehicle during the pendency of proceedings under PCSA, was dismissed.
Delhi High Court denies bail to two accused persons in #DelhiRiots case of violence against the @DelhiPolice in which HC Ratan Lal lost his life.
Noting that the footage of the two accused persons at the "Scene of Crime is quite egregious," the court said it was "sufficient to keep the Petitioner(s) in custody."
Comparing the cases to those of other accused who were given bail in the matter, the court said the Petitioners "did not satisfy the ingredients to claim bail on ground of parity with the other co-accused...as none of those co-accused...were caught in an overt act..."
BREAKING UPDATE: Attorney General grants sanction to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against @NijiSachiv for his YouTube video with allegedly “scurrilous" "vituperative" and "highly derogatory" words against Supreme Court and its judges.
Application by Law Student had stated that video titled ‘Ajeet Bharti Roasts Supreme Court, High Courts’ which was uploaded on @NijiSachiv’s
YouTube channel DO Politics “is not only in bad taste but also clearly crosses the line between constructive criticism and contempt”
Law student had alleged in the application that in the said video @NijiSachiv abused Supreme Court “using extremely crass and obscene language”, “tried to disgrace it on lines of rampant corruption, nepotism, being sold” and “directing protests and riots throughout the country”.
@dir_ed moves Delhi High Court seeking quashing of notices issued to its officers in Delhi on an FIR registered by the Kalighat PS in Kolkata on a complaint by @AITCofficial leader Abhishek Banerjee.
S. 160(1) CrPC notices have been issued to the Enforcement Directorate officers working from the headquarters in Delhi. ED states in its petition that it has been investigating into the illegal coal
mining scam and the role of Abhishek Banerjee in the scam.
ED states that the said FIR has been registered with a malafide intention to derail the investigation under PMLA being conducted by it in the illegal coal mining scam. @AITCofficial
[Access to Justice] Preliminary Research into available data in order to determine as to what extent, access to justice has been effected due to pandemic.
Kerala: 14 districts
i. [Kasargod]
Number of orders/ judgments Pre-pandemic: 2069
Number of Order/Judgments Post-pandemic: 913
Source: District Court Website
ii. [Thalassery, Kannur]
Number of Orders/Judgments Pre-pandemic: 5838
Number of Order/Judgments Post-pandemic: 2148
#DelhiHighCourt to hear plea of Avantha Group promoter Gautam Thapar against his arrest in a money laundering case in connection with the Yes Bank fraud scam.
NHRC issues notices to Delhi, Rajasthan, Haryana, UP, Union of India and other Authorities asking for reports of farmer protest. @India_NHRC has said that it has received several complaints with allegations of adverse impact on the industrial units, seriously effecting companies.
“Allegedly, transportation is also adversely impacted, causing the commuters, patients, physically challenged people and senior citizens to suffer due to the heavy congestion on roads” : NHRC
“There are also reports that people have to travel long distances to reach their destinations due to the ongoing farmers' agitation and barricades have been put on the borders.”: NHRC