I think it's important to remember that hospitals are full b/c we have the ability to save people from an otherwise horrific death. They are full b/c modern medicine has kept patients alive long enough to have a chance to continue to live.
This must be factored into all our discussions about mandates & safety. Because, even if unconsciously, we are already factoring it into the risk/reward calculus of resisting such protocols. But this is not a freedom shared by those in the developing world.
Which helps us evaluate our own calculus--not of risk & reward--but of rights & responsibilities. What responsibilities do we have *because* we have access to lifesaving modern medicine when others don't?
We should never make such calculations out of guilt or obligation. But we *must* make them from humility & gratitude.
I don't forgo feeding my children b/c other children are hungry. Instead, feed them well & rejoice in it. I teach them how to receive food with grateful hearts precisely b/c we know others are starving. And we are humbled by the fact that we aren't.
So too, we must understand that it is a luxury to be able to debate protocols & mandates. Yes, have the conversations. Deliberate on ethical & legal dimensions. But do so knowing that our ability to ask these questions is not a right so much as a privilege.
In this respect, an argument that does not factor in the global nature of the question--that does not see how debates about protocol are themselves brought to us by wealth & abundance--such an argument will be inherently flawed.
And to my ears, at least, sounds too much like children complaining about eating a casserole because they don't know what's in it.
All while their neighbors starve.
Again, you do not force feed the casserole down someone's throat. You do not offer it to those w/ allergies. But we also can't act like it's okay to reject the food offered to you b/c you know the pantry is full of food you prefer. (At least, it's not okay in my house.)
All that to say, both a full pantry & modern medicine come w/ responsibility. Abundance is a gift. But like all gifts, we must receive them w/ gratitude & humility, knowing that we are weak, dependent creatures whose fortunes could be turned upside down in an instant.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just left a comment on a FB post related to COVID vax. Saints, pray for me.
BUT on a related note... someone needs to look into how class divides are affecting people's confidence in vaccines. It's not about "trusting the science" so much as whether you know people you trust who are doing the science.
If you exist in a socioeconomic class that includes doctors, chemists, researchers, clinicians etc, you're more likely to have personal proximity to someone whose work you trust b/c you trust them.
Don't quote me yet, but I'm beginning to believe that the degree to which we are willing to own our particular sins is the degree to which we actually believe in grace.
It's one thing to confess the truth about human sinfulness. It's a very easy thing to do, in fact. But it's another thing to confess the truth about our particular sinfulness.
As a result, it's entirely possible to use the language of depravity & grace in such a generalized way as to make them functionally meaningless.
Obviously, certain people have higher risk of complications & serious illness if they contract COVID. That needs to be clear. Some people are more vulnerable & need more protection. But the way I'm hearing it used is more akin to, "This person didn't *really* die from COVID."
And the reason that frame is necessary, I think, is b/c so many folks have already bought the narrative that COVID isn't that serious. I think a lot of folks need to believe that they're safer than they are.
So I was up for at least 2 hours around midnight last night because my cat kept bringing live rabbits into the house.
As soon as I'd catch one & put it outside, the darned cat would bring another one in. (No, it wasn't the same rabbit.) A couple even ran behind the piano at one point so that was fun.
Around 1:30, I had a rabbit in one hand, a cat in the other, & a dog barking at all three of us.
Also, none of us should be surprised when people honestly think that their personal unease, discomfort, or "conviction" is sufficient grounds for a religious exemption.
The folks I know who think this way are not trying to game the system. They've just been raised in church traditions that centered their own personal experience of God as the defining reality of their faith.
I don't mean this cynically or jurdgmentally. But when people believe that the "priesthood of believers" means "primary interpreter" rather than "equal standing before Christ," they also can easily think that their "sense" about something comes directly from the Holy Spirit.