The commemorations of 9/11 feel especially odd this year. Perhaps because it's only starting to feel like history.

What happened that day changed everything for those who witnessed it, but now a whole generation has grown up who didn't.

So the work of remembering is different.
As we try to make sense of those terrible events and convey it to future generations, lots of us are reminded of one of the few good things about them: the sense that Americans had that they were united, that they were all part of a common cause. Solidarity, in other words.
It was, perhaps, inevitable for that feeling not to last. It's human nature to come together in times of external threat (Ronald Reagan used to wonder aloud about whether an alien invasion would bring world peace). But time marches on and new concerns and disagreements arise.
But the period of national unity and goodwill in the face of tragedy does throw into sharp relief how little of that we sometimes seem to have today.
For the past year and a half we've been experiencing an even deadlier national tragedy (albeit one that's more diffuse, quieter, and with no visible enemy).

And we're more divided and hostile toward one another than we've been in a very long time.
There's plenty of blame to go around for how we got here.

Some of it is the way our leaders leveraged that sense of unity in the years after 9/11, when they told themselves they could make Americans safer not just by going to war but by remaking the Middle East at gunpoint.
Meanwhile at home we increasingly seemed less capable of taking care of own. Katrina threw that into sharp relief.

The hollowing-out of the middle class (which had been building for a long time) was becoming more and more apparent. And then the hammerblow of 2008 came.
Obama's election gave many people (not just progressives) a temporary sense that a fundamental course correction was possible, and that we might get some of that sense of national solidarity back.

That didn't last either.
We very slowly dug ourselves out of the Great Recession, but untold numbers of lives and communities were wrecked in ways they would never fully recover from. Overreach abroad continued. Cultural and political polarization worsened.
Something seemed to snap in the national psyche sometime in Obama's 2nd term, much of it dealing with polarization around race. We were running out of patience with each other, increasingly seeing our politics as a cold civil war between fundamentally incompatible opposites.
Then we got a most unusual presidency: one that, from the very beginning, did not even make a pretense of attempting to unify the country.

And lots of Americans embraced that, because they were so alienated both from what ordinary politics had become and from other Americans.
But for all of his inflammatory nature, Trump was in many ways more a symptom than a cause. And that's why the people who hoped Biden would bring a return to a more normal and even boring way of doing politics are probably wrong.
And to be honest, we sometimes even wonder if (God forbid) some catastrophe on the scale of 9/11 happened today, whether we would see another outpouring of patriotism… or just another partisan circus of mutual blame and hatred.
All that raises the question of what 9/11 means for us today, and what we should be remembering.

We should remember those we lost, first and foremost.

We should remember the mistakes we made in the wake of that tragedy, too.
Perhaps what we need most is to remember what we and our fellow Americans are capable of when it comes down to it.

That kind of courage, devotion and sacrifice still exists in this country, and there is still need for it.

And we can still strive to be a country worthy of it.
@threadreaderapp Unroll for our friends

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with American Solidarity Party 🧡

American Solidarity Party 🧡 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AmSolidarity

4 Aug
There’s a lot going on in this fascinating (and sad) piece on how more adults than ever before are estranged from mom or dad.

🧵

theatlantic.com/family/archive…
TLDR: In the past, people tended to think of the parent/child relationship as a set of reciprocal obligations. The parents take care of the kids and one day the kids take care of the parents (of course people still sometimes think this way, especially in immigrant communities)
In mainstream American culture, though, that sense of mutual obligation has been weakened considerably, and what exactly adults are looking for in their relationship with their parents has been in flux.
Read 18 tweets
3 Aug
We have a big cohort of new followers (presumably lots of people who think @KSPrior is as cool as we do).

This is an FAQ thread:
1. Q: “Solidarity sounds communist. Are you guys Reds?”

A. Well, not any more than the Solidarity movement that helped bring down communism in Poland was.

Solidarity means “we’re all in this together,” and it would be a shame to assume only Marxists have any interest in that.
Q: You say you’re a Christian Democratic party. So, like, you’re
Democrats who are Christians?

A: Not really. Christian Democracy is a political tradition in its own right (though it’s an easy mistake to make, which is why we changed our name from the CDP-USA a long time ago).
Read 10 tweets
23 Jun
There are basically two meanings of the word “moderate.” One of them is good and one is, well, iffy.
Moderate (1) : You practice the virtue of moderation in your politics, which means you temper your own political enthusiasms and prejudices, consider nuances and competing goods, and recognize your own “team” is flawed and that your opponents have insights.
Moderate (2): You habitually split the difference between whatever the two sides of a polarized debate are saying and assume that’s where truth and justice is.
Read 8 tweets
23 Jun
New piece from our sister project @CommonsAmerican that will appeal to your inner Luddite.

theamericancommons.com/2021/06/19/lab…
"Labor saving technologies are good, new building materials are good, the idea of technological progress is largely good. However, they come with costs and ignoring those costs leads to terrible problems."
In this piece you will learn why the shingles on your house are cheap but are still, in many ways, a bad deal.

That's right, shingles.

You know you want to click.
Read 4 tweets
7 Jun
Text of the prayer from FDR’s radio address, June 6, 1944:

“Almighty God: Our sons, pride of our Nation, this day have set upon a mighty endeavor, a struggle to preserve our Republic, our religion, and our civilization, and to set free a suffering humanity...
Lead them straight and true; give strength to their arms, stoutness to their hearts, steadfastness in their faith.

They will need Thy blessings. Their road will be long and hard.
For the enemy is strong. He may hurl back our forces. Success may not come with rushing speed, but we shall return again and again; and we know that by Thy grace, and by the righteousness of our cause, our sons will triumph.
Read 14 tweets
6 Jun
We’ve said this before, but one of our problems with doctrinaire laissez-faire economics is that it often amounts to a form of moral relativism.

A pretty obvious way to see that is with a subject lots of people can relate to: housing. 🏡🏡🏡
In many metros around the country, rising housing prices are caused in large part by speculation rather than ordinary buyers looking for a place to live. In many cases the “investors” don’t improve the property, or even rent it out, but just sit on it and wait to sell.
Now if you care about is protecting property rights and contracts, then buying a house as a speculative asset is just as legitimate as living in it.

But it’s a problem if you think a house sitting empty is inherently less socially valuable than one providing a home for a family.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(