Thread by @kevinmcld

rather than sup the 9/11 narrative, why not some episodic-analytic research (strip away the intent of U.S. leadership) and examine strictly the actionable intel and their actions. first is the leaked mass of pre-intel, all citations are legitimate outlets.
historycommons.org/essay.jsp?arti…

same intel used at the 2001 Genoa G-8, with the U.S. fearing a suicide plane attack, has Bush sleep on the USS Enterprise, surrounded by an array of anti-aircraft vessels. while FAA intel briefs within US warn of the same thing, nothing is done. analysis?
historycommons.org/context.jsp?it…

Under New Management: "In fact, the [Bush presidency Cabinet-level] group will only hold one meeting on terrorism before 9/11...By comparison, the principals group met to discuss terrorism around once a week between 1998 and 2000 under Clinton."

Let's get our Priorities Clear, USA Leadership

(1998-2000)
3 years x 40-50 per year = 120-150 meetings on terrorism by the Cabinet level in Clinton admin.

(2001)
1 meeting on terrorism by the Cabinet in Bush admin.