I do not think the SpaceX commentator was reading from the right script there. Deployment is supposed to be at T+15:32 with no second stage restart.
I guess the problem with too many Starlink launches is copy and paste errors.
Are they going to come back for deployment? Or did they update the mission profile and she read the right thing? SpaceX website and the on-screen graphic are both synced for T+15:32.
My only other theory is that confirmation of deployment is not expected until later in the mission, and she was supposed to say that and not second stage restart.
I am increasingly thinking that the SpaceX host gave the right callout and the onscreen graphic and website are wrong.
SpaceX webcast hosts corrects the statement. The satellites should have been deployed. They are just waiting for a telemetry connection from Argentina around 26 minutes into the mission.
Deployment of 51 Starlink spacecraft confirmed.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Michael Baylor

Michael Baylor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nextspaceflight

14 Sep
LIVE: SpaceX is holding a Q&A with the Inspiration4 crew

- Benji Reed, SpaceX Director of Crew Mission Management
- Jared Isaacman, Inspiration4 Commander
- Hayley Arceneaux, Inspiration4 Medical Officer
- Dr. Sian Proctor, Inspiration4 Pilot
- Chris Sembroski, Inspiration4 Mission Specalist Image
Reed points out that this will be the first time that three Dragons are on orbit at once with the Crew-2 and CRS-23 Dragons at the Space Station right now.
Read 12 tweets
2 Aug
The next step in the FAA process is publication of the Draft EA for public comment. The baseline is 30 days for comments, per the FAA's website. And this is just the next step. There are other major steps too. FAA approval is still months away it seems.

Options that the FAA is working towards with the ongoing Environmental Assessment. EIS option would be a disaster for SpaceX, as it would mean an additional lengthy process.

And once the FAA says SpaceX is cleared from an environmental standpoint, there is still the launch license! The FAA cannot issue the launch license until SpaceX has environmental approval.
Read 4 tweets
30 Jul
Booster 4 is on the loose!

The methane section does not want to fly. Must have heard the first launch is likely expendable.🤣 Image
Grid fin install is the leading theory for the actual reason, but that is speculative. We will know soon enough. Stay tuned to Starbase LIVE.
Read 4 tweets
29 Jun
SpaceX has filed for FCC approval to fly Starlink terminals on the Super Heavy and Starship vehicles during the orbital launch demonstration. The requested start date is Aug. 1, meaning no launch in July if SpaceX wants to fly with Starlink onboard.

"SpaceX intends demonstrate high data rate communications with Starship and the Super Heavy Booster on the ground at the launch site in Starbase, TX during launch, during booster recovery, in flight, and during reentry."
"Starlink can provide unprecedented volumes of telemetry and enable communications during atmospheric reentry when ionized plasma around the spacecraft inhibits conventional telemetry frequencies."
Read 5 tweets
16 Apr
"I agree with the SEP’s assignment of a significant strength for SpaceX’s proposed capability to substantially exceed NASA’s threshold values or meet NASA’s goal values for numerous initial performance requirements."
"I note that the SEP did not identify any significant strengths within Blue Origin’s technical proposal. Nonetheless, Blue Origin’s proposal has several attractive technical attributes."
"I note that while the SEP evaluated several positive attributes for Dynetics’ technical approach under this factor, none of them resulted in the assignment of a significant strength."

Read 11 tweets
19 Jan
Following up on @thejackbeyer's find, I can confirm that Deimos and Phobos are the names of two oil rigs purchased by SpaceX – likely for conversion to support Starship operations.

ENSCO 8500 and ENSCO 8501 were the previous names of the rigs. They are nearly identical twins.
Both rigs were purchased by Lone Star Mineral Development LLC which is either a SpaceX subsidiary or a subsidiary of a company that SpaceX is leasing the rigs from (like SpaceX does with the droneships).
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!