While AOC's revolutionary and subversive socialist gown generated buzz, the normalization of maskless elites attended to by faceless servants is grotesque.
At Pelosi's donor lunch, Obama's birthday bash, and last night: workers are moving from figuratively to literally faceless.
Contrary to her jealous critics, AOC was not reveling a Louis XVI court festivity. She was *storming the Bastille*: not with weapons or fire but with the graceful designer elegance of the insurgent Marxist renegade, which made her presence all the more deceptively disruptive.
While AOC's subversive praxis was obviously a watershed moment for working-class politics, the more important lesson is the normalization of forcing servants to be masked while the elites they serve are free: a perfect symbol of the rot of America's cultural Balkanization.
All of this stopped being about The Science™ long ago. But the COVID pandemic has somehow managed to create all new ways to make the enormous chasm between the lives of cultural and political elites and everyone else even larger than it was before.
One final message for @AOC's embittered and envious critics, stewing with jealousy and resentment that she got to go and they didn't.
And it's not just the US. Here's a viral video circulating in Brazil today of some of the richest and most powerful men in Brazil, sitting and talking unmasked, while being waited on by masked servants. How long is this kind of imagery sustainable?
Never would have guessed that @AOC would announce that anyone questioning her appearance at the Met Gala is motivated by racism, misogyny and various other forms of bigotry. That's so unlike her to do.
She "broke the fourth wall" -- that again -- and forced a bunch of Biden Democrat celebrities and other assorted cultural liberals in attendance to be deeply uncomfortable because she wore a designer gown calling on the the rich be taxed. She did it all for you.✊
Would really love to hear any AOC fans try to justify this repugnant scene. Step right up with all of your best contortions. 🌹🌹✊
If you find it disturbing that elites go mask-free while their servants are forced to wear cloth over their face as they carry the train of their designer dress, it probably means you are a white supremacist and/or a misogynist, as AOC said earlier.
Today's DOJ indictment of a Hillary/DNC lawyer who spread lies as part of Russiagate is a huge deal. And it's absolutely true: the NYT & @charlie_savage this morning -- before anyone could see the indictment -- cast it in the most favorable light possible, as it if were trivial:
Most media outlets mindlessly spread the fraudulent Trump/Alfa-Bank story because they spread anything they were fed without caring. To its credit, the Intercept -- led by @samfbiddle & @lhfang -- pointed out the glaring flaws in the story at the time:
It wasn't just Hillary's lawyer who got indicted today, or their media servants, who spread this fraud about Trump's secret server with a Russian bank. Hillary herself endorsed and spread as her lawyer concocted the whole fraud in the first place:
The Special Counsel investigating the various frauds of Russiagate, John Dunham, is about to indict a Perkins Coie lawyer for feeding a fake story about Trump and Alfa Bank to the FBI and media, then lying by denying he represented the Clinton campaign:
The scam that Trump was using a secret server to communicate with a Russian bank was promoted by Hillary herself, and touted by media outlets led by @Slate. Like so much that comprised Russiagate, it was a total fraud concocted by the DNC & media allies:
In sum, a DNC-linked lawyer -- partners with Clinton lawyer @marceelias -- fabricated a Trump/Russia link, fed it to DNC operatives masquerading as journalists, had Hillary trumpet it, then lied to FBI about who he worked for.
Democratic Party YouTubers trying to dictate to @NICKIMINAJ what she can and can't say, who she is and isn't permitted to cite, what partisan box she must stay in.
It went poorly for @JoyAnnReid when she tried and I doubt it will go better for these 2 DNC socialist soldiers.
The only thing that enrages liberal gatekeepers more than urging people to make their own decisions rather than getting bullied into obedience is refusing to submit to their partisan prison. But since she's who she is, she can say what she wants, making it more dangerous still.
In about two years, Twitter and Facebook will just be Chris Hayes, Amy Klobuchar, Jen Rubin and Adam Schiff arguing about whether Nancy Pelsoi is or isn't more awesome than Kamala Harris and everyone else will be banned.
A few points to highlight about the above-linked video report we just published on the attempts by Sen. Warren & Adam Schiff to demand Amazon suppress certain books.
First, this is part of a year-long campaign by Dems to use their majority power in DC to mandate censorship.
There are so many reasons why this attempt by the Democratic Party to commandeer Big Tech censorship power for themselves is so dangerous.
Perhaps the gravest is that this is all about imposing a framework where dissent from or questioning of decrees from authorities is banned.
Adoption of orphans and other children with no parents to care for them is one of the most beautiful acts humans have managed to create, and - as we saw during the Amy Coney Barrett nomination - these hate-filled, miserable, selfish ghouls are trying to degrade it as racist evil.
If you can't stomach looking at yourself in the mirror -- figuratively and literally -- because you know you do nothing in your life for others and your political values are empty words, the solution is to change, not malign others who aren't plagued by your selfish emptiness.
In 2017, I did extensive reporting in the Brazil context on the kinds of adoptions being demeaned and maligned by this deranged ideology. We produced a short documentary on an adoptive family which these theories are aimed at. Judge for yourself:
One thing that interests me most are political projects that erode pointless left-right divisions, to unite people for actual results. @davidmirandario's police project in Brazil is to fund more mental health services for police officers: helping them & reducing brutality/abuse.
The chances that a police officer will be killed in large Brazilian cities is higher than soldiers in war zones. Many have PTSD, mental health pathologies & very high suicide rates: confronting hideous violence for low pay. Funding programs like this reduces brutality and abuse.
When Rio City Councilwoman Marielle Franco was assassinated in 2018 (still unsolved), many on the right accused her of being anti-police: until mothers of slain police officers stepped forward to say she was the only one to help: taking public buses for hours to provide aid.