“Nullius in verba.”Take no one’s word for it. A cornerstone of science for 350 years.
1/
1/
Except that we often do have to take authors’ words for it. Most methods sections are skeletons of what is actually done - especially in computationally heavy studies.
2/
2/
But what if articles were different? What if an article was instead a “platform” that shared data & code upfront for full transparency & reproducibility?
3/
3/
Today @CircOutcomes publishes a new type of article. Science not on paper. Not on a digital PDF. But on a platform. An "experience" to be directly manipulated.
ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.116…
4/
ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.116…
4/
Science on a platform has several advantages, including better communication of complex ideas, greater transparency & reproducibility. The article is a secondary artifact of the study and not its primary product. See the editorial below...
ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.116…
5/
ahajournals.org/doi/abs/10.116…
5/
Many thanks to @byron_jaeger @ramarajus - a special group of authors - for their work in putting this together. And thanks also to the @AHAScience Precision Medicine Platform for hosting data & code.
Instructions for access at: ahajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1…
Fin/
Instructions for access at: ahajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1…
Fin/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
