Earlier this year, we convened 42 academics to explore a shared narrative on short term (next 10 years) & long term (following years up to 2050) measures for #netzero 0⃣
Experts represented the topic areas of energy supply 🏭 energy demand 🚄 & greenhouse gas removal (GGR) 🌲
Initial analysis of the workshop transcripts has revealed eight overarching themes in relation to building a narrative around delivering #netzero
These are summarised below with a brief insight into each:
1⃣ The need to develop social legitimacy for an ambitious decarbonisation pathway
It was identified that a more active public debate around #netzero could help socialise the lifestyle adjustments required for rapid decarbonisation within specific sectors.
2⃣ Different perspectives on the social and political feasibility of solutions
There was a split between ‘realist’ & ‘idealist’ measures, with some favouring less disruptive short-term solutions, esp. for demand reduction, while others advocated more drastic lifestyle changes.
3⃣ The role of technological optimism and systems change
There was a split in priorities in relation to developing techs, programmes+ policies to sit within current socio-technical systems vs the need for more dramatic systemic change to drive rapid emissions reductions.
4⃣ The need to rapidly roll out ‘ready to go’ infrastructure and technologies
For example, updating electricity networks, improving system flexibility and scaling up offshore wind were highlighted as ‘safe bets’ for decarbonising energy supply.
5⃣ The need to improve ‘readiness’ of solutions and roll out infrastructure for the long term
This was particularly prominent in GGR groups, where deploying infrastructure for CCUS & developing robust monitoring, reporting+ verification protocols were seen as high priorities.
6⃣ The need to upskill and capacity build in the workforce, government and civil service
For example, energy supply groups expressed the need to upskill workers to deploy infrastructure, which could form part of the economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic.
7⃣ The need for a more active and interventionist policy approach
For example, the development of a whole system plan to implement decarbonisation across government departments, linked to regulatory intervention, was viewed as a priority.
8⃣ The need for continued investment into new, potentially disruptive technologies and solutions
Viewed as particularly important by the energy supply+ GGR groups, discussing increased investment in BECCS, DACs, energy storage, marine RE, offshore hydrogen+ system flexibility.
More insights and a comparison between workshop results are available in the full report: bit.ly/3A9p1P8
Thank you for reading 🙏 Let us know your thoughts.
These themes will be explored further in our next round of academic workshops 💡
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Studies indicate energy technologies take 20-68 years to move from 1st prototype to 1% of a national market ⏰
Accelerating this process requires the emergence of:
📜supporting policies
⚖️regulatory frameworks
🤝firm engagement &
🙋♀️societal support
..to drive market creation
As energy represents a complex legacy sector, this process will be slowed and shaped by inertia contained within existing systems, as new technologies increasingly drive disruption 🎆
Accelerating innovation therefore depends on funding and policies put in place TODAY✅