frustrating Senate hearing where the olympian survivors of abuse are detailing specific issues w the FBI and DOJ handling their case, the FBI and DOJ aren’t present, and the senators are making speeches and requesting homilies addressed to other survivors and the American people
FBI Director Wray is testifying in a separate panel. He says the supervisory special agent has been fired and the IG’s recommendations are being implemented.
Sen. Blumenthal is asking about the FBI agents who were referred for criminal prosecution but not prosecuted. Unfortunately, he only has the FBI Director and DOJ Inspector General, who made the referrals, to ask about it—and not anyone in the DOJ chain of command.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with southpaw

southpaw Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nycsouthpaw

17 Sep
Every year before the court gets back to work in October, the justices do some press and they typically say some media-bashing stuff like this—arguing that legal realism is something deceitful reporters made up and foisted on the people. washingtonpost.com/politics/court… ImageImage
But it’s not true. Legal realism is predictive in ways that all the jewel box ideologies the Justices like to invent and lecture about are not. And it’s practiced discreetly by the clerks and lawyers who are closest to the court. The best documented example: Brett Kavanaugh.
Before he was on the court, Kavanaugh was one of the Republican lawyers who worked in the Bush White House picking right wing judicial nominees and kibitzing about what the courts were going to do. We have his emails. And they’re shot through with the views Thomas denounces here.
Read 4 tweets
16 Sep
The Michael Sussman indictment out of the Durham investigation, via the Washington Post. context-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/def…
lol ok Image
To explain, the whole basis for this indictment is that (a) DOJ hazily contends that Sussman represented the Clinton campaign and (b) Jim Baker doesn't remember him saying that he did and this other guy's hearsay notes suggest he said he wasn't there on behalf of a client...
Read 5 tweets
15 Sep
As with other pre-indictment stories on federal investigations, I’ll caution this news likely comes via the defense lawyers and may reflect their particular lens on the case or their desire to position it a particular way in the public sphere. nytimes.com/2021/09/15/us/… Image
On the other hand, the Durham investigation has been pretty peculiar so maybe it is doing something outlandish.
So with that throat clearing out of the way, the allegation as presented in the story is that a Perkins lawyer went to the FBI to present the Alfa bank research and, in some prefatory remarks recalled by the FBI GC, misrepresented on whose behalf he was doing it.
Read 6 tweets
15 Sep
It’s apparently so little represented anywhere on the news that I guess I should spell out my own view of the recall election.
California is an idiosyncratic state. It has a truly massive Democratic supermajority in the electorate, a rump Republican party that’s given over to extremism, and a byzantine initiative and referendum system everyone responsible despises (but can’t manage to reform).
One feature of that referendum system is that it’s ridiculously easy to trigger a recall and, crucially, gain an outside chance of electing a fringe candidate. Because if the recall question succeeds, the top vote getter on the replacement question takes over the office.
Read 8 tweets
13 Sep
Sorry to nicki minaj’s cousin’s friend whose alibi for getting swollen nuts and having his wedding called off is about to fall apart under the intense scrutiny of the global media.
Trinidadian TV not impressed
Read 4 tweets
11 Sep
Attributing all these changes to 9/11 rather than price deregulation is a take.
I remember in like 2004-07 there were all these random startups flying 777s in an exclusively business-class configuration—silverjet, maxjet, EOS—and throwing in loads of other fancy perks. Every single one went bankrupt and liquidated, and not because of security requirements.
Also, the piece makes a big thing out of its lead anecdote about a TWA pilot ordering off-airport pizzas for stranded passengers, and how such a thing could never ever happen after 9/11. But it has.

This is not the only example from the past couple years. travelandleisure.com/travel-news/pi…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(