1: A thread connecting the dots between:

(1) @PeterDaszak et al's fascinating recent preprint on the *many* SARS-related CoV infections in humans per year in Southeast Asia, and

(2) The furin cleavage site of SARS-CoV-2, and

(3) Why Wuhan?

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
2: The study uses a clever combination of data streams to estimate that 400,000 people per year are being infected by SARS-related coronaviruses.
3: The authors note that not all of those infections are likely to be transmissible human to human

I strongly agree with this. We would see multiple new pandemic origins every year if even 0.1% of these were viable human to human pathogens.
4: I think of pandemic origins as a layer of selective sieves, each with a finer mesh than the previous one.

The first sieve is lack of ecological opportunity. Most SARSr CoVs never have a chance to get from a bat or intermediate species into a human. But some do.
4: They are the ones that circulate in animals that get close to humans. Bats in caves near human settlements, or viruses in intermediate hosts that get to wet markets, for example, as with SARS1.
5: These lucky viruses encounter sieve 2: human defenses. Our bodies have wonderful 'restriction factors' that can prevent a virus from completing its life cycle.
One, for example, mutates the hell out of the genomes of baby viruses, preventing them from having their own babies.
6: But some have the right genome to sidestep these defenses and flourish within a human. These encounter sieve 3: inability to get to the next host.

We see this with avian flu. Avian H5N1s might be great at spreading deep in the lungs, killing their human host...
7: ...but don't do well in the upper respiratory tract, so they never move on to human #2.

A subset of SARSr-CoVs can get through this sieve, and can infect at some secondary human hosts.
8: But only a subset of that subset happen the have the right genetic stuff to get through sieve 4: inefficient human to human transmission.

SARS-CoV-2 has the right genetic stuff.
9: But even unicorns like SARS-CoV2 hit one last sieve (#5): not enough fertile soil. Joel Wertheim, @pekar @niemasd Konrad Scheffler and I showed that even a virus as contagious as SC2 would die out 70% of the time when dropped into a city like Wuhan...

science.org/doi/full/10.11…
10: ...and would die out 94.5 to 99.6% of the time it landed in a rural environment.

So, assuming 400,000 SARSr-CoV infections per year, and a new outbreak/pandemic every 20 years, SARS-CoV-2 is a 'one-in-8-million' virus, *not* just a random sample of bat SARSr-CoV diversity.
11: As such, we should not be surprised *at all* that SARS-CoV-2 has a rare set of genetic features that allow it to infect humans and transmit between them.
12: Its furin cleavage site is one such a feature.

It may or may not be vanishingly rare in nature - you might have to screen a million bat samples before you see it. But it's exactly the sort thing you expect in a unicorn that gets through sieves 1-4.
13: And a city like Wuhan is what you expect after sieve 5. Large, densely populated, served by multiple wet markets selling the same species involved in SARS1 emergence.
14: This is (part of the reason) why, even though I keep an open mind to lab leak scenarios, I think a zoonotic origin from a wet market, or markets, is so, *so* much more likely.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Worobey

Michael Worobey Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MichaelWorobey

4 Sep
1: I want to follow up the thread below with some additional clarification of why we hypothesize that there may be no real #SARSCoV2 genomes transitional between lineages A and B.

2: @daoyu15 has written a thread asserting that we "toss any genomes that don't fit your conclusions away". I'm afraid this is incorrect on multiple counts.

3: What we show is that many of the putatively transitional genomes bear obvious evidence of being artefacts - probably due to bioinformatic pipelines, rather than sequencing errors per se. (Issues like calling a site with poor coverage to be the base of a reference genome.)
Read 13 tweets
4 Sep
1: We have just posted a study suggesting there may be no real #SARSCoV2 genomes that are transitional between lineages A and B. Arcane, right?

But stick with me - this stuff is *absolutely* crucial to figuring out how the pandemic got started.

virological.org/t/evidence-aga…
2: Honoured to be working on this project with an *amazing* team: @jepekar, @EdythParker, Jennifer Havens, @suchard_group, Kristian Andersen, @niemasd, @arambaut, and Joel Wertheim (leading the charge).

So, what's a 'transitional' genome?
3: To explain, let me introduce you to 'lineage A' and 'lineage B', aka 'clade II' and 'clade I', respectively, in this paper by Zhang et al. These lineages co-circulated in China during the early days of the pandemic, and they differ at two key sites.

nature.com/articles/s4158…
Read 33 tweets
28 Aug
1/4: Good piece from @NPR on the declassified summary of the 90-day intelligence community (IC) review on the origin of #SARSCoV2.

npr.org/2021/08/27/103…
2/4: A little soundbite from me:

[Worobey] would like to see the scientific and intelligence communities collaborate on the problem. "I would hope and assume that this 90-day sprint is going to turn into a nice long jog where there could be some back-and-forth."
3/4 Crucial point US IC elements agree on:

"China’s officials did not have foreknowledge of the virus before the initial outbreak of COVID-19 emerged".

So could we *please* collectively move on from claim that WIV database removal in Sept 2019 was part of a cover-up/conspiracy?
Read 4 tweets
8 Aug
SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 in Italy in September 2019: the most important finding yet on the origin of the pandemic*.

(*or an error with big consequences.)

A thread. 1/24

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
The study, led by Dr. Elisabetta Tanzi, also includes heavy-hitters of molecular evolution @sergeilkp and Sudhir Kumar. I greatly admire both but respectfully disagree with their conclusions here and feel it is important to explain why. 2/
Dr. Tanzi led an earlier study claiming to find evidence of SARS-CoV-2 in a boy in Northern Italy who presented with measles symptoms in Nov 2019. 3/

wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/27…
Read 26 tweets
22 Jul
Here I explain why I (continue to) think that a zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2 is more likely than a lab leak scenario - even though I signed 'The Science Letter'. 1/
I am a co-author, with @jbloom_lab, @DavidRelman and others, of a widely discussed letter in Science Magazine that argues that both a zoonotic origin and a lab-linked origin are important to consider. 2/
science.sciencemag.org/content/372/65…
I'm also a co-author, with @edwardcholmes, @arambaut, @angie_rasmussen, @stgoldst, @robertson_lab, and others, of a recent preprint that argues that a zoonotic emergence is the more likely scenario. 3/
zenodo.org/record/5075888…
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(