Thread by @WP_Owls

@mattmedeiros started a very interesting discussion

https://twitter.com/mattmedeiros/status/1437762587479973890

. Especially @dumitru answer "Sub to one = sub to all" got me thinking, And I decided to do a quick check. A thread.

I decided to compare how many articles from the last issue of @WP_Owls were published in different newsletters. Because each newsletter is published on a different day I decided to compare with 2 last issues of other newsletters.

I compared @WP_Owls with @post_status, @thewpweekly, @BinaryMoon (Master WP), @wpMailMe and @therepositorywp .

This week we published 16 news and there wasn't any news that were published by all newsletters.

Only one news were published by 5 sources (WordPress 5.9 Planning Roundup).

Rest of the news was covered in 3 sources or less.

We had 5 articles that weren't covered anywhere else.

Of course there were news that we didn't covered.

Also because of publish dates, some newsletters will cover some stories in their next issue.

So what is the point of this thread? WP Newsletters differ and by a lot.

Some have less news but build a story around them and some do exactly the opposite.

Also we all differ in link number MasterWP has < 10 WP Owls ~15 and Post Status ~40+.

And that's it. I think that following many newsletter has a lot of sense to get the full picture of what is happening in the #WordPress space.

It also depends on what we except to get. Lots of links that have to filter, a story or something in between.

Personally I love following all the mentioned newsletters (and @gutenbergtimes) because I can learn a lot from all of you.