In the UK heating with fossil fuels is often the cheapest alternative. But how can we change that and make clean heating a more attractive option?

New piece for @GreenAllianceUK by me & @heatpolicyrich @RegAssistProj. THREAD greenallianceblog.org.uk/2021/09/16/reb…
1) It is widely accepted that heat pumps will play a major role for decarbonising heating. But their running costs are usually higher than gas boilers. This is because we put most of the climate policy costs on electricity and almost none on fossil fuels.
2) This issue is well-understood also thanks to the great work of the @CommonsEAC led by @Dunne4Ludlow. telegraph.co.uk/environment/20…
3) An obvious solution is to shift levies away from electricity. There are several options including shifting levies to fossil fuels, shifting the levies to general taxation perhaps combined with a modest carbon tax on fossil fuels or exempting the electricity used by heat pumps.
4) Option 1: Share levies based on carbon
Levies would be shared based on carbon intensity of fuels & encourage switch to increasingly clean power. NL already doing this: tax on fossil gas up to 43% higher by 2026 (compared to 2019 levels) & lower taxation on electricity.
5) Option 2: Move levies into general taxation
This approach would mean to pay for the levies on electricity via general taxation. It could be combined with a modest carbon tax on gas. This is effectively what Germany does. cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/ger…
6) Option 3: Exempt electricity from levies and taxes used by heat pumps
Households installing a heat pump would receive a levy discount on the amount of electricity used for heating. Denmark has done this with the effective tax rate being 0.1p/kWh. ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/d…
7) All of these options exist in different variations in other countries and could be adapted for the UK context. @racheljanetwolf @publicfirst_pf led analysis published earlier this year calculating what it would mean for households and the Exchequer. publicfirst.co.uk/options-for-en…
8) There is support of and interest in levy reform from a range of businesses including @eonenergyuk @OVOEnergy @ScottishPower @centricaplc & @OctopusEnergy. Here is one example. eonenergy.com/business/news-…
9) Why is this issue so fundamental? As long as the running costs for clean heating are higher than fossil fuel alternatives government would have to provide huge subsidies to make economics stack up or regulate for less economic technologies. Both politically very difficult.
10) In the UK the taxes and levies on gas are particularly low. This results in one of the lowest heat pump installation rates in Europe.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jan Rosenow

Jan Rosenow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @janrosenow

14 Sep
The climate crisis is wreaking havoc across the world. Meanwhile in the UK we continue to subsidise new fossil fuel boilers.

theguardian.com/environment/20…
1) Let’s take a step back to understand what’s going on here. The Energy Company Obligation (ECO) is a long-standing energy efficiency programme. The first variation of its kind started in 1994. 10 years ago I wrote my PhD thesis on it @ecioxford. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
2) ECO (or the Supplier Obligation as it is also known) has always supported installing new fossil fuel boilers. Especially during EEC 1+2 and CERT millions of condensing boilers were installed. This led to very large energy savings. centrica.com/media/1635/bg_… Image
Read 11 tweets
17 Aug
The UK hydrogen strategy is finally out. My take on it in this thread. gov.uk/government/new…
1) The hydrogen strategy rightly identifies hydrogen as a key ingredient for the energy transition especially in areas such as power, industry and parts of the transport sector.
2) As my quote on @BBCNews says “But, as the strategy admits, there won’t be significant quantities of low carbon hydrogen for some time. We need to use it where there are few alternatives and not as a like-for-like replacement of gas.” bbc.com/news/science-e…
Read 24 tweets
16 Aug
Not only can we afford the costs of net zero but we will have to. The alternative is a disastrous and very costly future. Excellent piece by @jameskirkup @SMFthinktank @spectator.

spectator.co.uk/article/in-def…
1) The climate deniers lost the battle around the evidence base and failed with their attempts to discredit the science more than 10 years ago.
2) Unable to challenge climate science the deniers have now turned to the costs of net zero as the new battleground. On a weekly basis they attack policies driving decarbonisation as being unaffordable.
Read 6 tweets
21 Jul
In recent weeks claims have been made that electrification of end uses doesn’t deliver carbon savings because it runs on dirty fossil fuel generation. I argue here that these arguments do not stack up and prolong the combustion of fossil fuels. Thread 1/n energymonitor.ai/tech/electrifi…
2) Estimating carbon savings associated with electrification is complex. A number of analysts have made admirable attempts to appraise emissions savings from a shift to EVs and heat pumps. These studies show electrification leads to significant reductions in carbon emissions.
3) The German media reported widely on research claiming electric cars that run on power generated by coal are no cleaner than petrol and diesel cars. @AukeHoekstra quickly debunked this.
Read 10 tweets
20 Jul
The Fit for 55 package presented last week includes carbon pricing in the buildings sector through an ETS. This raises equity concerns that will need to be addressed or the project will fail. euractiv.com/section/climat…
1) Targeted recycling of carbon revenues for energy efficiency and low carbon heating are essential as we @RegAssistProj argue here. raponline.org/knowledge-cent…
2) Carbon revenues can also be used to lower policy legacy costs put on energy bills. This is what Germany is implementing. Revenues will be used to lower RES surcharges, relief measures for citizens and climate action support programmes. @cleanenergywire cleanenergywire.org/factsheets/ger…
Read 4 tweets
19 Jul
Opponents of heat electrification often state heat pumps 'don't work in old buildings'. Not true says @JohnCantor2 dispelling this myth in his excellent article. And John knows - he has been designing & installing heat pumps since the 1980s. Thread 1/7
heatpumps.co.uk/2020/11/03/hea… Image
@JohnCantor2 2/7 First conclusion: “The right heat pump could be made to heat any building to any temperature we like. But the crux of the issue is the installation cost and the running cost.”
3/7 The question John says that we should ask is – “can we heat old buildings and achieve acceptable energy-efficiency?” His response: “Well… we probably can, and as time passes, it gets better.“
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(