Is it a Fourth Amendment search if police officers touch the hood and/or wheel well of a car to determine if it had been recently driven? utcourts.gov/opinions/supop…
In an opinion today, the Supreme Court of Utah found it didn't have to answer this question b/c the automobile exception applied: utcourts.gov/opinions/supop…
The court grappled with whether/how United States v. Jones applied to the facts:
The court also cited to @lsacharoff:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Colin Miller

Colin Miller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EvidenceProf

17 Sep
Eleventh Circuit grants qualified immunity to prison officer who left inmate w/broken bone and partially-severed tendon in a cell that was 3 feet from medical examination room for several hours: media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/f… Image
In finding that the officer didn't violate a clearly established right, the court found that the inmate was *only* "'leaking' an indeterminate amount of blood 'all over' and leaving a 'path of blood.'"
The court thus contrasted his case from a prior case in which it denied qualified immunity when an officer failed to get care for an inmate whose blood soaked his clothing & pooled on the floor.
Read 4 tweets
29 May 20
My @UofSCLaw students @ac_parham/@JasCaruthers & I have been researching no-knock warrant data for the Breonna Taylor case. Some preliminary findings #thread cc: @ACLUofKY @louisvillemayor @GovAndyBeshear @djaycameron
The @denverpost reviewed no-knock warrant requests for a 1-year period from 1999-2000. 167 no-knock warrants were requested. 162 were approved and only *5* were denied (3% denial rate).
More than 82% of the no-knock raids targeted minority residents (race of the target wasn't specified in 3% of cases). At the time, Denver's population was 56% Caucasian.
Read 25 tweets
7 May 20
Ronnie Long can prove his innocence today after *44 years* of wrongful conviction. I will be live tweeting about oral arguments, which you can livestream here at 9:00am EST:
Long is claiming Brady violations based upon forensic evidence that has been withheld for decades such as a suspect hair from the crime scene that was not a match for him & dozens of fingerprints which also weren't a match.
The only evidence against him was a highly suggestive, in-court, cross-racial identification by the witness, who was wearing a disguise.
Read 144 tweets
7 Jan 20
Potentially HUGE news for Adnan Syed. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland orders the circuit court to issue a writ of actual innocence in the James Kulbicki case: courts.state.md.us/sites/default/…
Kulbicki's case, you might recall, is the main (only?) case that the State/Thiru Vignarajah used to argue against Adnan's cell tower claim.
In Kulbicki, the Court of Appeals of Maryland granted Kulbicki a new trial, finding that his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to question the State's experts about flaws w/Comparative Bullet Lead Analysis.
Read 9 tweets
6 Nov 19
Oral arguments starting in the Joey Watkins case. I will live tweet in this thread: gasupreme.us/live/
Joey's attorney argues cell tower evidence shows he couldn't have gotten to the crime scene in time for the murder.
Notes how juror ignored the instruction not to do a drive test, which a juror did...leading to change from not guilty to guilty.
Read 60 tweets
2 Nov 19
Dear @Undisclosedpod listeners (and anyone else interested): You can stream the Supreme Court of Georgia oral arguments in the Joey Watkins case on Wednesday, November 6th here: gasupreme.us/watch/
@Undisclosedpod Oral arguments start that day at 10:00am EST, and his case is the second one on the docket.
@Undisclosedpod The primary issue is whether Watkins's attorneys should have contacted the jurors in the case before @TheViewFromLL2 talked to a juror who admitted to improperly doing a drive test to determine whether Joey could have been the killer.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(